Fox News Channel host Sean Hannity interviews U.S. President Donald Trump on September 20, 2018 in Las Vegas, Nevada. (Photo by Ethan Miller/Getty Images)
Mar 05, 2019
Democrats announced Wednesday that the Fox News network will not be invited to host any Democratic debates in the 2020 election, citing investigative journalist Jane Mayer's in-depth New Yorker article about the channel.
Tom Perez, chairman of the Democratic National Committee (DNC), said it was necessary to exclude Fox and its TV personalities from participating in the debates due to President Donald Trump's "inappropriate relationship" with the network and its function as the White House's unofficial propaganda outlet, as described in Mayer's reporting.
The article, Perez added, led him "to conclude that the network is not in a position to host a fair and neutral debate for our candidates. Therefore, Fox News will not serve as a media partner for the 2020 Democratic primary debates."
Media critic Jay Rosen credited Mayer for leading the DNC to its decision with her extensive accounting of Fox's approach to promoting Trump's policies and even advising him on governing the country.
\u201cWow. @JaneMayerNYer gets results! "Democratic National Committee rejects Fox News for debates, citing New Yorker article."\nhttps://t.co/xa93WOEfnu\u201d— Jay Rosen (@Jay Rosen) 1551896666
Fox, which was established in 1996 by Roger Ailes, a former strategist for Presidents Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan, has been known as a right-wing news outlet for decades. But Mayer argued in her report that the network has shifted from delivering partisan news to its viewers to selling them propaganda.
Mayer reported that when Fox hosted Republican presidential debates in 2015, sources from the network tipped Trump off regarding questions the Fox News moderators planned to ask.
The president receives policy advice from Fox hosts Lou Dobbs and Pete Hegseth, with the two being included by phone in some Oval Office meetings, and shares nightly phone calls with Sean Hannity.
"Nothing has formalized the partnership between Fox and Trump more than the appointment, in July, 2018, of Bill Shine, the former co-president of Fox News, as director of communications and deputy chief of staff at the White House," Mayer added, writing that Shine's presence in the Trump administration after more than a decade at the network has meant that a major player in the White House is now being paid by both entities:
With Shine, the Fox and White House payrolls actually do overlap. The Hollywood Reporter obtained financial-disclosure forms revealing that Fox has been paying Shine millions of dollars since he joined the Administration. Last year, he collected the first half of a seven-million-dollar bonus that he was owed after resigning from Fox; this year, he will collect the remainder.
On social media, some argued that the DNC's decision would keep Democratic candidates from engaging with Fox viewers who could potentially be persuaded to vote for them in 2020--but critics including journalist Judd Legum wrote that including Fox in the debates would give the network "undeserved legitimacy."
\u201cThe process of publicly considering Fox News as a host gave the network undeserved legitimacy. The DNC cites the (great) New Yorker article. But the nature of the network has been known for many years.\n\nI appreciate the need to reach persuadable voters, but there are other venues\u201d— Judd Legum (@Judd Legum) 1551897785
\u201cThe only people tut-tutting the DNC's decision to skip Fox News are "Don't abandon norms" fetishists. But unofficial government propaganda outfits do not get to host debates. That is a norm. That norm is being preserved.\u201d— Mark Harris (@Mark Harris) 1551899947
The fact that you have to remind people that quality journalists exist at Fox is itself an illustration of how bad the network mostly is and why it shouldn't be enabled or supported in any way. https://t.co/jampMnTBqd
-- Osita Nwanevu (@OsitaNwanevu) March 6, 2019
The only reason why Fox keeps a contingent of Real Journalists is to help justify the nonsense and propaganda of the rest of the enterprise to more passive viewers, advertisers, politicians and potential guests, and themselves. This mentality helps keep the whole thing running.
-- Osita Nwanevu (@OsitaNwanevu) March 6, 2019
"A key part of the motivation behind this decision is a recognition that Fox News is fundamentally in the business of spreading disinformation, as opposed to conservative reportage," wrote Greg Sargent at the Washington Post. "And the recognition that as such, Fox is at the throbbing core of something that has become a major blight on American political life is correct and important."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Democrats announced Wednesday that the Fox News network will not be invited to host any Democratic debates in the 2020 election, citing investigative journalist Jane Mayer's in-depth New Yorker article about the channel.
Tom Perez, chairman of the Democratic National Committee (DNC), said it was necessary to exclude Fox and its TV personalities from participating in the debates due to President Donald Trump's "inappropriate relationship" with the network and its function as the White House's unofficial propaganda outlet, as described in Mayer's reporting.
The article, Perez added, led him "to conclude that the network is not in a position to host a fair and neutral debate for our candidates. Therefore, Fox News will not serve as a media partner for the 2020 Democratic primary debates."
Media critic Jay Rosen credited Mayer for leading the DNC to its decision with her extensive accounting of Fox's approach to promoting Trump's policies and even advising him on governing the country.
\u201cWow. @JaneMayerNYer gets results! "Democratic National Committee rejects Fox News for debates, citing New Yorker article."\nhttps://t.co/xa93WOEfnu\u201d— Jay Rosen (@Jay Rosen) 1551896666
Fox, which was established in 1996 by Roger Ailes, a former strategist for Presidents Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan, has been known as a right-wing news outlet for decades. But Mayer argued in her report that the network has shifted from delivering partisan news to its viewers to selling them propaganda.
Mayer reported that when Fox hosted Republican presidential debates in 2015, sources from the network tipped Trump off regarding questions the Fox News moderators planned to ask.
The president receives policy advice from Fox hosts Lou Dobbs and Pete Hegseth, with the two being included by phone in some Oval Office meetings, and shares nightly phone calls with Sean Hannity.
"Nothing has formalized the partnership between Fox and Trump more than the appointment, in July, 2018, of Bill Shine, the former co-president of Fox News, as director of communications and deputy chief of staff at the White House," Mayer added, writing that Shine's presence in the Trump administration after more than a decade at the network has meant that a major player in the White House is now being paid by both entities:
With Shine, the Fox and White House payrolls actually do overlap. The Hollywood Reporter obtained financial-disclosure forms revealing that Fox has been paying Shine millions of dollars since he joined the Administration. Last year, he collected the first half of a seven-million-dollar bonus that he was owed after resigning from Fox; this year, he will collect the remainder.
On social media, some argued that the DNC's decision would keep Democratic candidates from engaging with Fox viewers who could potentially be persuaded to vote for them in 2020--but critics including journalist Judd Legum wrote that including Fox in the debates would give the network "undeserved legitimacy."
\u201cThe process of publicly considering Fox News as a host gave the network undeserved legitimacy. The DNC cites the (great) New Yorker article. But the nature of the network has been known for many years.\n\nI appreciate the need to reach persuadable voters, but there are other venues\u201d— Judd Legum (@Judd Legum) 1551897785
\u201cThe only people tut-tutting the DNC's decision to skip Fox News are "Don't abandon norms" fetishists. But unofficial government propaganda outfits do not get to host debates. That is a norm. That norm is being preserved.\u201d— Mark Harris (@Mark Harris) 1551899947
The fact that you have to remind people that quality journalists exist at Fox is itself an illustration of how bad the network mostly is and why it shouldn't be enabled or supported in any way. https://t.co/jampMnTBqd
-- Osita Nwanevu (@OsitaNwanevu) March 6, 2019
The only reason why Fox keeps a contingent of Real Journalists is to help justify the nonsense and propaganda of the rest of the enterprise to more passive viewers, advertisers, politicians and potential guests, and themselves. This mentality helps keep the whole thing running.
-- Osita Nwanevu (@OsitaNwanevu) March 6, 2019
"A key part of the motivation behind this decision is a recognition that Fox News is fundamentally in the business of spreading disinformation, as opposed to conservative reportage," wrote Greg Sargent at the Washington Post. "And the recognition that as such, Fox is at the throbbing core of something that has become a major blight on American political life is correct and important."
Democrats announced Wednesday that the Fox News network will not be invited to host any Democratic debates in the 2020 election, citing investigative journalist Jane Mayer's in-depth New Yorker article about the channel.
Tom Perez, chairman of the Democratic National Committee (DNC), said it was necessary to exclude Fox and its TV personalities from participating in the debates due to President Donald Trump's "inappropriate relationship" with the network and its function as the White House's unofficial propaganda outlet, as described in Mayer's reporting.
The article, Perez added, led him "to conclude that the network is not in a position to host a fair and neutral debate for our candidates. Therefore, Fox News will not serve as a media partner for the 2020 Democratic primary debates."
Media critic Jay Rosen credited Mayer for leading the DNC to its decision with her extensive accounting of Fox's approach to promoting Trump's policies and even advising him on governing the country.
\u201cWow. @JaneMayerNYer gets results! "Democratic National Committee rejects Fox News for debates, citing New Yorker article."\nhttps://t.co/xa93WOEfnu\u201d— Jay Rosen (@Jay Rosen) 1551896666
Fox, which was established in 1996 by Roger Ailes, a former strategist for Presidents Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan, has been known as a right-wing news outlet for decades. But Mayer argued in her report that the network has shifted from delivering partisan news to its viewers to selling them propaganda.
Mayer reported that when Fox hosted Republican presidential debates in 2015, sources from the network tipped Trump off regarding questions the Fox News moderators planned to ask.
The president receives policy advice from Fox hosts Lou Dobbs and Pete Hegseth, with the two being included by phone in some Oval Office meetings, and shares nightly phone calls with Sean Hannity.
"Nothing has formalized the partnership between Fox and Trump more than the appointment, in July, 2018, of Bill Shine, the former co-president of Fox News, as director of communications and deputy chief of staff at the White House," Mayer added, writing that Shine's presence in the Trump administration after more than a decade at the network has meant that a major player in the White House is now being paid by both entities:
With Shine, the Fox and White House payrolls actually do overlap. The Hollywood Reporter obtained financial-disclosure forms revealing that Fox has been paying Shine millions of dollars since he joined the Administration. Last year, he collected the first half of a seven-million-dollar bonus that he was owed after resigning from Fox; this year, he will collect the remainder.
On social media, some argued that the DNC's decision would keep Democratic candidates from engaging with Fox viewers who could potentially be persuaded to vote for them in 2020--but critics including journalist Judd Legum wrote that including Fox in the debates would give the network "undeserved legitimacy."
\u201cThe process of publicly considering Fox News as a host gave the network undeserved legitimacy. The DNC cites the (great) New Yorker article. But the nature of the network has been known for many years.\n\nI appreciate the need to reach persuadable voters, but there are other venues\u201d— Judd Legum (@Judd Legum) 1551897785
\u201cThe only people tut-tutting the DNC's decision to skip Fox News are "Don't abandon norms" fetishists. But unofficial government propaganda outfits do not get to host debates. That is a norm. That norm is being preserved.\u201d— Mark Harris (@Mark Harris) 1551899947
The fact that you have to remind people that quality journalists exist at Fox is itself an illustration of how bad the network mostly is and why it shouldn't be enabled or supported in any way. https://t.co/jampMnTBqd
-- Osita Nwanevu (@OsitaNwanevu) March 6, 2019
The only reason why Fox keeps a contingent of Real Journalists is to help justify the nonsense and propaganda of the rest of the enterprise to more passive viewers, advertisers, politicians and potential guests, and themselves. This mentality helps keep the whole thing running.
-- Osita Nwanevu (@OsitaNwanevu) March 6, 2019
"A key part of the motivation behind this decision is a recognition that Fox News is fundamentally in the business of spreading disinformation, as opposed to conservative reportage," wrote Greg Sargent at the Washington Post. "And the recognition that as such, Fox is at the throbbing core of something that has become a major blight on American political life is correct and important."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.