A woman attends a protest just after President Donald Trump nominated Neil Gorsuch for a lifetime appointment on the Supreme Court. (Photo: Victoria Pickering/Flickr/cc)
Advocacy Group Calls On Democratic Candidates to Share How They Would Remake Judiciary to Work for All Americans--Not Corporations
"While Democrats play by the rules, Republicans are shredding the rule book, and the result is a partisan Supreme Court that works for corporations and the Republican Party and against everyone else."
Advocacy group Demand Justice on Tuesday urged Democratic presidential candidates to apply the same focus on the future of the entire federal judicial branch that President Donald Trump did in 2016, a focus which allowed him to immediately begin shaping the courts for generations to come when he took office.
Democratic candidates, the group said, should put significant thought into the kinds of judges they would nominate for federal seats and let voters know what they can expect from the judiciary under their potential administrations.
"In 2016, Donald Trump released a shortlist of possible Supreme Court picks, and it succeeded in rallying conservative voters to his side," Demand Justice wrote. "In 2020, the Democratic candidates running for president should also state what kind of justices they would appoint. Doing so would show their commitment to the Supreme Court as an issue and draw a clear line in the sand about what is at stake in the coming election."
Trump's success in nominating judges has led to a federal appeals court system where six out of 10 judges are former corporate lawyers. Demand Justice's own shortlist of 32 potential progressive nominees aims to counter that right-wing tilt and includes attorneys whose work has been focused on racial justice, civil rights, and human rights.
"The combination of rising corporate power and eroding legal protections for workers and consumers has resulted in a system that empowers corporations to take advantage of individuals with near-impunity," Demand Justice wrote earlier this year. "This trend has fed the massive transfer of wealth and political power away from everyday Americans and toward large corporations and their shareholders."
"The next Democratic president must nominate judges who represent the antithesis of this," the group added.
Demand Justice also drew attention to the Republican Senate's tactics over the last several years as the party accumulated more and more judicial power--such as Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell refusing to hold confirmation hearings for Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland in the last months of President Obama's administration, a move that enabled Trump to nominate Justice Neil Gorsuch; Republican senators' and Justice Brett Kavanaugh's conduct during Kavanaugh's confirmation hearings in 2018; and McConnell's use of the "nuclear option" for all presidential nominees, which allows the GOP to push through nominees with a simple majority.
"While Democrats play by the rules, Republicans are shredding the rule book, and the result is a partisan Supreme Court that works for corporations and the Republican Party and against everyone else," Demand Justice chief counsel Christopher Kang said in a statement.
The group's shortlist includes longtime racial and criminal justice reform advocates Michelle Alexander and Bryan Stevenson; Nicole Berner, general counsel for the SEIU; Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights CEO Vanita Gupta, who has also served in the Civil Rights division at the Justice Department; and Judge Carlton Reeves, an Obama appointee who has blocked and sharply criticized some of the most extreme anti-choice laws put forward under the Trump administration.
"Democrats running for president...should be bold enough to pick someone who's worked to defend civil rights, workers' rights, or reproductive rights" to serve on the nation's highest courts, tweeted Demand Justice executive director Brian Fallon.
Formal federal civil rights prosecutor Chiraag Bains praised Demand Justice for including on its shortlist people with "serious intellectual firepower, a history of being proximate to suffering, and a commitment to the Constitution's core democratic values."
"This is a very effective demonstration of how easily a Democratic president could find very progressive SCOTUS nominees if they wanted to," tweeted Vox journalist Ian Millhiser.
Demand Justice also called on the news media--particularly the CNN and New York Times journalists who are moderating the Democratic debate on Thursday evening--to address the question of who the candidates might nominate to federal court seats.
"We need you to ask about the courts at the Democratic debate," Demand Justice wrote. "The GOP has hijacked our nation's courts, and voters need to hear plans to fight back."
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just two days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Advocacy group Demand Justice on Tuesday urged Democratic presidential candidates to apply the same focus on the future of the entire federal judicial branch that President Donald Trump did in 2016, a focus which allowed him to immediately begin shaping the courts for generations to come when he took office.
Democratic candidates, the group said, should put significant thought into the kinds of judges they would nominate for federal seats and let voters know what they can expect from the judiciary under their potential administrations.
"In 2016, Donald Trump released a shortlist of possible Supreme Court picks, and it succeeded in rallying conservative voters to his side," Demand Justice wrote. "In 2020, the Democratic candidates running for president should also state what kind of justices they would appoint. Doing so would show their commitment to the Supreme Court as an issue and draw a clear line in the sand about what is at stake in the coming election."
Trump's success in nominating judges has led to a federal appeals court system where six out of 10 judges are former corporate lawyers. Demand Justice's own shortlist of 32 potential progressive nominees aims to counter that right-wing tilt and includes attorneys whose work has been focused on racial justice, civil rights, and human rights.
"The combination of rising corporate power and eroding legal protections for workers and consumers has resulted in a system that empowers corporations to take advantage of individuals with near-impunity," Demand Justice wrote earlier this year. "This trend has fed the massive transfer of wealth and political power away from everyday Americans and toward large corporations and their shareholders."
"The next Democratic president must nominate judges who represent the antithesis of this," the group added.
Demand Justice also drew attention to the Republican Senate's tactics over the last several years as the party accumulated more and more judicial power--such as Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell refusing to hold confirmation hearings for Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland in the last months of President Obama's administration, a move that enabled Trump to nominate Justice Neil Gorsuch; Republican senators' and Justice Brett Kavanaugh's conduct during Kavanaugh's confirmation hearings in 2018; and McConnell's use of the "nuclear option" for all presidential nominees, which allows the GOP to push through nominees with a simple majority.
"While Democrats play by the rules, Republicans are shredding the rule book, and the result is a partisan Supreme Court that works for corporations and the Republican Party and against everyone else," Demand Justice chief counsel Christopher Kang said in a statement.
The group's shortlist includes longtime racial and criminal justice reform advocates Michelle Alexander and Bryan Stevenson; Nicole Berner, general counsel for the SEIU; Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights CEO Vanita Gupta, who has also served in the Civil Rights division at the Justice Department; and Judge Carlton Reeves, an Obama appointee who has blocked and sharply criticized some of the most extreme anti-choice laws put forward under the Trump administration.
"Democrats running for president...should be bold enough to pick someone who's worked to defend civil rights, workers' rights, or reproductive rights" to serve on the nation's highest courts, tweeted Demand Justice executive director Brian Fallon.
Formal federal civil rights prosecutor Chiraag Bains praised Demand Justice for including on its shortlist people with "serious intellectual firepower, a history of being proximate to suffering, and a commitment to the Constitution's core democratic values."
"This is a very effective demonstration of how easily a Democratic president could find very progressive SCOTUS nominees if they wanted to," tweeted Vox journalist Ian Millhiser.
Demand Justice also called on the news media--particularly the CNN and New York Times journalists who are moderating the Democratic debate on Thursday evening--to address the question of who the candidates might nominate to federal court seats.
"We need you to ask about the courts at the Democratic debate," Demand Justice wrote. "The GOP has hijacked our nation's courts, and voters need to hear plans to fight back."
Advocacy group Demand Justice on Tuesday urged Democratic presidential candidates to apply the same focus on the future of the entire federal judicial branch that President Donald Trump did in 2016, a focus which allowed him to immediately begin shaping the courts for generations to come when he took office.
Democratic candidates, the group said, should put significant thought into the kinds of judges they would nominate for federal seats and let voters know what they can expect from the judiciary under their potential administrations.
"In 2016, Donald Trump released a shortlist of possible Supreme Court picks, and it succeeded in rallying conservative voters to his side," Demand Justice wrote. "In 2020, the Democratic candidates running for president should also state what kind of justices they would appoint. Doing so would show their commitment to the Supreme Court as an issue and draw a clear line in the sand about what is at stake in the coming election."
Trump's success in nominating judges has led to a federal appeals court system where six out of 10 judges are former corporate lawyers. Demand Justice's own shortlist of 32 potential progressive nominees aims to counter that right-wing tilt and includes attorneys whose work has been focused on racial justice, civil rights, and human rights.
"The combination of rising corporate power and eroding legal protections for workers and consumers has resulted in a system that empowers corporations to take advantage of individuals with near-impunity," Demand Justice wrote earlier this year. "This trend has fed the massive transfer of wealth and political power away from everyday Americans and toward large corporations and their shareholders."
"The next Democratic president must nominate judges who represent the antithesis of this," the group added.
Demand Justice also drew attention to the Republican Senate's tactics over the last several years as the party accumulated more and more judicial power--such as Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell refusing to hold confirmation hearings for Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland in the last months of President Obama's administration, a move that enabled Trump to nominate Justice Neil Gorsuch; Republican senators' and Justice Brett Kavanaugh's conduct during Kavanaugh's confirmation hearings in 2018; and McConnell's use of the "nuclear option" for all presidential nominees, which allows the GOP to push through nominees with a simple majority.
"While Democrats play by the rules, Republicans are shredding the rule book, and the result is a partisan Supreme Court that works for corporations and the Republican Party and against everyone else," Demand Justice chief counsel Christopher Kang said in a statement.
The group's shortlist includes longtime racial and criminal justice reform advocates Michelle Alexander and Bryan Stevenson; Nicole Berner, general counsel for the SEIU; Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights CEO Vanita Gupta, who has also served in the Civil Rights division at the Justice Department; and Judge Carlton Reeves, an Obama appointee who has blocked and sharply criticized some of the most extreme anti-choice laws put forward under the Trump administration.
"Democrats running for president...should be bold enough to pick someone who's worked to defend civil rights, workers' rights, or reproductive rights" to serve on the nation's highest courts, tweeted Demand Justice executive director Brian Fallon.
Formal federal civil rights prosecutor Chiraag Bains praised Demand Justice for including on its shortlist people with "serious intellectual firepower, a history of being proximate to suffering, and a commitment to the Constitution's core democratic values."
"This is a very effective demonstration of how easily a Democratic president could find very progressive SCOTUS nominees if they wanted to," tweeted Vox journalist Ian Millhiser.
Demand Justice also called on the news media--particularly the CNN and New York Times journalists who are moderating the Democratic debate on Thursday evening--to address the question of who the candidates might nominate to federal court seats.
"We need you to ask about the courts at the Democratic debate," Demand Justice wrote. "The GOP has hijacked our nation's courts, and voters need to hear plans to fight back."