SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) tested positive for the coronavirus, he announced Sunday. (Photo: Gage Skidmore/flickr/cc)
With at Least Three Members of US Congress Infected With Coronavirus, Calls for Remote Voting Grow
"Congress should be an example, not an exception, on public health."
Mar 23, 2020
With at least three members of Congress as well as the spouse of at least one senator testing positive for the coronavirus which has now spread to more than 41,000 Americans and killed more than 450, lawmakers are pushing their leadership to institute new rules allowing for remote voting.
More than 60 lawmakers from both sides of the aisle sent a letter to House leadership on Monday calling for emergency remote voting.
"Requiring members to vote in person may pose public health risks or even be physically impossible for persons under quarantine," the letter reads. "We need to provide a mechanism through which Congress can act during times of crisis without having to assemble in one place."
The call followed the positive coronavirus tests of at least three lawmakers. Rep. Ben McAdams (D-Utah) and Mario Diaz-Balart (R-Fl.) tested positive last week, while Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) announced Sunday he had tested positive. Sen. Amy Klobuchar's (D-Minn.) husband also revealed Monday he had contracted the coronavirus.
Paul did not self-isolate after getting tested, and crossed paths with other colleagues in the Senate swimming pool while awaiting his results as well as eating with other senators at several lunches.
\u201cI took a picture inside the Senate GOP lunch when the door was open Friday and saw Rand Paul seated next to other senators. He is visible in this photo.\u201d— Manu Raju (@Manu Raju) 1584900466
The news of Paul's diagnosis led Sens. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) to self-quarantine. Other lawmakers have also spent weeks in isolation since the coronavirus outbreak reached Capitol Hill earlier this month.
On social media, Rep. Katie Porter (D-Calif.) was among those calling on House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and other congressional leaders to allow remote voting to ensure members of Congress can negotiate and vote on an economic stimulus package and other legislation without risking contracting the coronavirus.
"Congress should be an example, not an exception, on public health," Porter wrote, as Americans across the country are working from home, staying home from school, and closing restaurants and other small businesses to help curb the outbreak.
\u201cWhen it comes to social distancing and public health best practices, Congress should be an example, not an exception.\n\nSo @RepSwalwell, @RepVanTaylor, and I are leading a group of 50+ Reps. to call on leaders of both parties to allow remote voting, so we can keep doing our jobs.\u201d— Rep. Katie Porter (@Rep. Katie Porter) 1584568964
According to CBS News, a swift rules change is unlikely. The last significant amendment to voting rules in Congress happened in 1973--after three years of debate--to allow electronic voting in the Senate and House chambers.
Some in Congress have suggested passing legislation via voice votes or unanimous consent so that all members don't need to be present and have argued remote voting is not feasible because it could open the door to court challenges to any bills passed remotely.
Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) slammed some of his colleagues for their reluctance to adapt to the current public health crisis, as millions of Americans have.
"There are a bunch of so-called institutionalists who are resisting remote voting but we could soon lack a quorum due to mandatory self quarantine," Schatz tweeted. "We MUST operate like plenty of American corporations and other organizations and enable voting electronically or by phone."
Other political observers called on members of Congress to view their current dilemma as a catalyst for rethinking how all voting works in the U.S. democratic process.
\u201cCongress needs remote voting for contingencies like coronavirus. But regular voters need mail voting for the same reason. It's pretty worrying that there isn't much discussion of the latter, at least on the federal level.\u201d— Nate Silver (@Nate Silver) 1584977838
"If the GOP supports remote voting for members of Congress," ABC News political analyst Matthew Dowd tweeted, "then Democrats should insist the same privilege be given to voters in elections through vote at home, vote by mail, etc."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
With at least three members of Congress as well as the spouse of at least one senator testing positive for the coronavirus which has now spread to more than 41,000 Americans and killed more than 450, lawmakers are pushing their leadership to institute new rules allowing for remote voting.
More than 60 lawmakers from both sides of the aisle sent a letter to House leadership on Monday calling for emergency remote voting.
"Requiring members to vote in person may pose public health risks or even be physically impossible for persons under quarantine," the letter reads. "We need to provide a mechanism through which Congress can act during times of crisis without having to assemble in one place."
The call followed the positive coronavirus tests of at least three lawmakers. Rep. Ben McAdams (D-Utah) and Mario Diaz-Balart (R-Fl.) tested positive last week, while Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) announced Sunday he had tested positive. Sen. Amy Klobuchar's (D-Minn.) husband also revealed Monday he had contracted the coronavirus.
Paul did not self-isolate after getting tested, and crossed paths with other colleagues in the Senate swimming pool while awaiting his results as well as eating with other senators at several lunches.
\u201cI took a picture inside the Senate GOP lunch when the door was open Friday and saw Rand Paul seated next to other senators. He is visible in this photo.\u201d— Manu Raju (@Manu Raju) 1584900466
The news of Paul's diagnosis led Sens. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) to self-quarantine. Other lawmakers have also spent weeks in isolation since the coronavirus outbreak reached Capitol Hill earlier this month.
On social media, Rep. Katie Porter (D-Calif.) was among those calling on House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and other congressional leaders to allow remote voting to ensure members of Congress can negotiate and vote on an economic stimulus package and other legislation without risking contracting the coronavirus.
"Congress should be an example, not an exception, on public health," Porter wrote, as Americans across the country are working from home, staying home from school, and closing restaurants and other small businesses to help curb the outbreak.
\u201cWhen it comes to social distancing and public health best practices, Congress should be an example, not an exception.\n\nSo @RepSwalwell, @RepVanTaylor, and I are leading a group of 50+ Reps. to call on leaders of both parties to allow remote voting, so we can keep doing our jobs.\u201d— Rep. Katie Porter (@Rep. Katie Porter) 1584568964
According to CBS News, a swift rules change is unlikely. The last significant amendment to voting rules in Congress happened in 1973--after three years of debate--to allow electronic voting in the Senate and House chambers.
Some in Congress have suggested passing legislation via voice votes or unanimous consent so that all members don't need to be present and have argued remote voting is not feasible because it could open the door to court challenges to any bills passed remotely.
Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) slammed some of his colleagues for their reluctance to adapt to the current public health crisis, as millions of Americans have.
"There are a bunch of so-called institutionalists who are resisting remote voting but we could soon lack a quorum due to mandatory self quarantine," Schatz tweeted. "We MUST operate like plenty of American corporations and other organizations and enable voting electronically or by phone."
Other political observers called on members of Congress to view their current dilemma as a catalyst for rethinking how all voting works in the U.S. democratic process.
\u201cCongress needs remote voting for contingencies like coronavirus. But regular voters need mail voting for the same reason. It's pretty worrying that there isn't much discussion of the latter, at least on the federal level.\u201d— Nate Silver (@Nate Silver) 1584977838
"If the GOP supports remote voting for members of Congress," ABC News political analyst Matthew Dowd tweeted, "then Democrats should insist the same privilege be given to voters in elections through vote at home, vote by mail, etc."
With at least three members of Congress as well as the spouse of at least one senator testing positive for the coronavirus which has now spread to more than 41,000 Americans and killed more than 450, lawmakers are pushing their leadership to institute new rules allowing for remote voting.
More than 60 lawmakers from both sides of the aisle sent a letter to House leadership on Monday calling for emergency remote voting.
"Requiring members to vote in person may pose public health risks or even be physically impossible for persons under quarantine," the letter reads. "We need to provide a mechanism through which Congress can act during times of crisis without having to assemble in one place."
The call followed the positive coronavirus tests of at least three lawmakers. Rep. Ben McAdams (D-Utah) and Mario Diaz-Balart (R-Fl.) tested positive last week, while Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) announced Sunday he had tested positive. Sen. Amy Klobuchar's (D-Minn.) husband also revealed Monday he had contracted the coronavirus.
Paul did not self-isolate after getting tested, and crossed paths with other colleagues in the Senate swimming pool while awaiting his results as well as eating with other senators at several lunches.
\u201cI took a picture inside the Senate GOP lunch when the door was open Friday and saw Rand Paul seated next to other senators. He is visible in this photo.\u201d— Manu Raju (@Manu Raju) 1584900466
The news of Paul's diagnosis led Sens. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) to self-quarantine. Other lawmakers have also spent weeks in isolation since the coronavirus outbreak reached Capitol Hill earlier this month.
On social media, Rep. Katie Porter (D-Calif.) was among those calling on House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and other congressional leaders to allow remote voting to ensure members of Congress can negotiate and vote on an economic stimulus package and other legislation without risking contracting the coronavirus.
"Congress should be an example, not an exception, on public health," Porter wrote, as Americans across the country are working from home, staying home from school, and closing restaurants and other small businesses to help curb the outbreak.
\u201cWhen it comes to social distancing and public health best practices, Congress should be an example, not an exception.\n\nSo @RepSwalwell, @RepVanTaylor, and I are leading a group of 50+ Reps. to call on leaders of both parties to allow remote voting, so we can keep doing our jobs.\u201d— Rep. Katie Porter (@Rep. Katie Porter) 1584568964
According to CBS News, a swift rules change is unlikely. The last significant amendment to voting rules in Congress happened in 1973--after three years of debate--to allow electronic voting in the Senate and House chambers.
Some in Congress have suggested passing legislation via voice votes or unanimous consent so that all members don't need to be present and have argued remote voting is not feasible because it could open the door to court challenges to any bills passed remotely.
Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) slammed some of his colleagues for their reluctance to adapt to the current public health crisis, as millions of Americans have.
"There are a bunch of so-called institutionalists who are resisting remote voting but we could soon lack a quorum due to mandatory self quarantine," Schatz tweeted. "We MUST operate like plenty of American corporations and other organizations and enable voting electronically or by phone."
Other political observers called on members of Congress to view their current dilemma as a catalyst for rethinking how all voting works in the U.S. democratic process.
\u201cCongress needs remote voting for contingencies like coronavirus. But regular voters need mail voting for the same reason. It's pretty worrying that there isn't much discussion of the latter, at least on the federal level.\u201d— Nate Silver (@Nate Silver) 1584977838
"If the GOP supports remote voting for members of Congress," ABC News political analyst Matthew Dowd tweeted, "then Democrats should insist the same privilege be given to voters in elections through vote at home, vote by mail, etc."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.