Acting Director of Office of Management and Budget Russell Vought listens during a cabinet meeting in the East Room of the White House on May 19, 2020. (Photo: Alex Wong/Getty Images)
May 28, 2020
Administration officials have confirmed that the White House, breaking with decades of precedent, will not publish a mid-year economic forecast--a decision critics said is an obvious move to shield President Donald Trump from the political implications of a tanking economy ahead of November's election.
"Trump figures if he doesn't tell people they're out of work, they won't know they're out of work," tweeted writer Gerry Conway.
\u201cAfter months of promising a V-shaped recovery that will take off \u201clike a rocket ship\u201d, the Trump Admin cowardly blames \u201cvolatility\u201d for not publishing econ forecasts just months before Nov elections. https://t.co/AmkxqoOVsr\u201d— Steven Rattner (@Steven Rattner) 1590674378
News of the decision came from the Washington Post Thursday morning.
As the Post reported:
The White House is supposed to unveil a federal budget proposal every February and then typically provides a "mid-session review" in July or August with updated projections on economic trends such as unemployment, inflation, and economic growth.
[...]
The economic projections are jointly produced by a "troika" consisting of the director of [the Office of Management and Budget], the chair of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, and the treasury secretary.
The economic downturn triggered by the pandemic has left millions of Americans out of work, led to double-digit unemployment, and stretched the country's meager social safety net to the limit. On Thursday, the Department of Labor reported that another 2.1 million Americans filed for unemployment benefits, bringing the total number of people who have filed since the pandemic began to at least 40 million.
According to Politico, "administration officials said the data is too volatile to produce reliable projections," making the forecast problematic as it could "mislead the public." But that claim was rejected by Bipartisan Policy Center vice-president Bill Hoagland, who told the Post that there was "no logistical reason they couldn't do it."
"It seems more likely they do not want to bring attention to the high level of unemployment they'd have to project for this year, and into next year," said Hoagland.
The tactic could backfire, tweeted Alabama Media Group columnist Kyle Whitmire.
"Public officials' willingness to withhold information that will inevitably come out never ceases to astound me," said Whitmire. "It's like refusing to release a weather forecast that says a hurricane will make landfall tomorrow. Eventually, the truth will tell itself."
\u201cThis is disgraceful by the White House. I do wonder if they're not releasing completely-dishonest numbers because:\n\na) staff refuse to produce them, or\n\nb) an empty intersection between what would be politically acceptable to them & what would not destroy any credibility.\u201d— Aaron Sojourner (@Aaron Sojourner) 1590672734
For now, though, the immediate benefit for the Trump White House is clear, former Congressional Budget Office director Douglas Holtz-Eakin told the Post.
"It gets them off the hook for having to say what the economic outlook looks like," Holtz-Eakin said.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Our Summer Campaign is now underway, and there’s never been a more urgent time for Common Dreams to be as vigilant as possible. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Administration officials have confirmed that the White House, breaking with decades of precedent, will not publish a mid-year economic forecast--a decision critics said is an obvious move to shield President Donald Trump from the political implications of a tanking economy ahead of November's election.
"Trump figures if he doesn't tell people they're out of work, they won't know they're out of work," tweeted writer Gerry Conway.
\u201cAfter months of promising a V-shaped recovery that will take off \u201clike a rocket ship\u201d, the Trump Admin cowardly blames \u201cvolatility\u201d for not publishing econ forecasts just months before Nov elections. https://t.co/AmkxqoOVsr\u201d— Steven Rattner (@Steven Rattner) 1590674378
News of the decision came from the Washington Post Thursday morning.
As the Post reported:
The White House is supposed to unveil a federal budget proposal every February and then typically provides a "mid-session review" in July or August with updated projections on economic trends such as unemployment, inflation, and economic growth.
[...]
The economic projections are jointly produced by a "troika" consisting of the director of [the Office of Management and Budget], the chair of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, and the treasury secretary.
The economic downturn triggered by the pandemic has left millions of Americans out of work, led to double-digit unemployment, and stretched the country's meager social safety net to the limit. On Thursday, the Department of Labor reported that another 2.1 million Americans filed for unemployment benefits, bringing the total number of people who have filed since the pandemic began to at least 40 million.
According to Politico, "administration officials said the data is too volatile to produce reliable projections," making the forecast problematic as it could "mislead the public." But that claim was rejected by Bipartisan Policy Center vice-president Bill Hoagland, who told the Post that there was "no logistical reason they couldn't do it."
"It seems more likely they do not want to bring attention to the high level of unemployment they'd have to project for this year, and into next year," said Hoagland.
The tactic could backfire, tweeted Alabama Media Group columnist Kyle Whitmire.
"Public officials' willingness to withhold information that will inevitably come out never ceases to astound me," said Whitmire. "It's like refusing to release a weather forecast that says a hurricane will make landfall tomorrow. Eventually, the truth will tell itself."
\u201cThis is disgraceful by the White House. I do wonder if they're not releasing completely-dishonest numbers because:\n\na) staff refuse to produce them, or\n\nb) an empty intersection between what would be politically acceptable to them & what would not destroy any credibility.\u201d— Aaron Sojourner (@Aaron Sojourner) 1590672734
For now, though, the immediate benefit for the Trump White House is clear, former Congressional Budget Office director Douglas Holtz-Eakin told the Post.
"It gets them off the hook for having to say what the economic outlook looks like," Holtz-Eakin said.
Administration officials have confirmed that the White House, breaking with decades of precedent, will not publish a mid-year economic forecast--a decision critics said is an obvious move to shield President Donald Trump from the political implications of a tanking economy ahead of November's election.
"Trump figures if he doesn't tell people they're out of work, they won't know they're out of work," tweeted writer Gerry Conway.
\u201cAfter months of promising a V-shaped recovery that will take off \u201clike a rocket ship\u201d, the Trump Admin cowardly blames \u201cvolatility\u201d for not publishing econ forecasts just months before Nov elections. https://t.co/AmkxqoOVsr\u201d— Steven Rattner (@Steven Rattner) 1590674378
News of the decision came from the Washington Post Thursday morning.
As the Post reported:
The White House is supposed to unveil a federal budget proposal every February and then typically provides a "mid-session review" in July or August with updated projections on economic trends such as unemployment, inflation, and economic growth.
[...]
The economic projections are jointly produced by a "troika" consisting of the director of [the Office of Management and Budget], the chair of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, and the treasury secretary.
The economic downturn triggered by the pandemic has left millions of Americans out of work, led to double-digit unemployment, and stretched the country's meager social safety net to the limit. On Thursday, the Department of Labor reported that another 2.1 million Americans filed for unemployment benefits, bringing the total number of people who have filed since the pandemic began to at least 40 million.
According to Politico, "administration officials said the data is too volatile to produce reliable projections," making the forecast problematic as it could "mislead the public." But that claim was rejected by Bipartisan Policy Center vice-president Bill Hoagland, who told the Post that there was "no logistical reason they couldn't do it."
"It seems more likely they do not want to bring attention to the high level of unemployment they'd have to project for this year, and into next year," said Hoagland.
The tactic could backfire, tweeted Alabama Media Group columnist Kyle Whitmire.
"Public officials' willingness to withhold information that will inevitably come out never ceases to astound me," said Whitmire. "It's like refusing to release a weather forecast that says a hurricane will make landfall tomorrow. Eventually, the truth will tell itself."
\u201cThis is disgraceful by the White House. I do wonder if they're not releasing completely-dishonest numbers because:\n\na) staff refuse to produce them, or\n\nb) an empty intersection between what would be politically acceptable to them & what would not destroy any credibility.\u201d— Aaron Sojourner (@Aaron Sojourner) 1590672734
For now, though, the immediate benefit for the Trump White House is clear, former Congressional Budget Office director Douglas Holtz-Eakin told the Post.
"It gets them off the hook for having to say what the economic outlook looks like," Holtz-Eakin said.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.