The Google logo is projected onto a man on August 9, 2017 in London. (Photo: Leon Neal/Getty Images)
'Long Overdue': Justice Department Sues Google in Antitrust Case
The filing, announced Tuesday morning, accuses the tech giant of violating law to stifle competition.
The U.S. Justice Department announced Tuesday an antitrust lawsuit against Google--a filing that marks the biggest government case tackling tech power since the one targeting Microsoft in 1998.
The filing is joined by 11 states, all of which have Republican governors, as Reuters noted.
Rep. David Cicilline (D-R.I.) responded to the announcement by pointing to the House antitrust subcommittee's recent report finding that Google, along with other tech giants, holds monopoly power.
"This step is long overdue," Cicilline tweeted of the government's new lawsuit, adding, "It is time to restore competition online."
As CNN reported:
[The complaint] alleges in part that Google pays billions of dollars a year to device manufacturers likeApple, LG, Motorola, and Samsung and browser developers like Mozilla and Opera to be their default search engine and in many cases to prohibit them from dealing with Google's competitors. As a result, "Google effectively owns or controls search distribution channels accounting for roughly 80% of the general search queries in the United States."
What's more, the Washington Post added:
With this vast, unparalleled reach, Google further enriched itself through lucrative ads that appear alongside search results, the DOJ found. The massive profits from that business allowed Google to maintain its foothold and make it impossible for other search engines to compete, the lawsuit alleges.
Google, for its part, called the lawsuit "deeply flawed," said it was based on "dubious antitrust arguments," and claimed it will "make it harder for people to get the search services they want to use."
Attorney General William Barr--appointed by President Donald Trump--said in a statement the legal action was a "monumental case" that followed 16 months of the Justice Department's antitrust division collecting "convincing evidence" about the company he dubbed "the monopoly gatekeeper of the internet."
"Twenty-five years ago, the Department of Justice sued Microsoft, paving the way for a new wave of innovative tech companies--including Google," he explained. "The increased competition following the Microsoft case enabled Google to grow from a small start-up to an internet behemoth."
"Unfortunately," said Barr, "once Google itself gained dominance, it resorted to the same anti-competitive playbook."
Open Markets Institute, a research and advocacy group, framed the lawsuit as a "big moment."
In a Twitter thread Monday ahead of the announcement, the group wrote that "Google... acquired its dominance of the internet search market by bribing smartphone manufacturers and wireless operators not to install rival search engines on devices they sold."
Alex Harman, competition policy advocate at Public Citizen, suggested the lawsuit deserves little praise from anti-monopoly advocates because it amounted to merely "a thinly veiled political stunt."
"The Trump DOJ's narrow focus and alienation of the bipartisan state attorneys general is evidence of an unserious approach driven by politics and is likely to result in nothing more than a choreographed slap on the wrist for Google," Harman said.
Harman further framed the filing as "a missed opportunity to bring about a structural reckoning with one of the most powerful and wealthy companies in the world so that Trump and Barr can score political points" and pointed to state attorneys general as being better equipped to lead the charge.
That effort is still underway.
New York Attorney General Letitia James said following the DOJ announcement that the multi-state antitrust investigation into Google she's leading will continue, with parts of that probe set to conclude "in the coming weeks."
"If we decide to file a complaint," said James, "we would file a motion to consolidate our case with the DOJ's. We would then litigate the consolidated case cooperatively, much as we did in the Microsoft case."
While the government's filing targets Google, other tech giants could soon find themselves in similar territory.
According to the Associated Press, the new lawsuit could mark "an opening salvo ahead of other major government antitrust actions, given ongoing investigations of major tech companies including Apple, Amazon, and Facebook at both the Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission."
More, however, would still need to be done to address abuses committed by tech behemoths.
That's according to Tom Wheeler, former Federal Communications Commission chair under the Obama administration.
In an op-ed Tuesday at TIME, Wheeler wrote that the "abusive practices of the dominant digital platforms are so widespread and have become so embedded that there is no single solution. What is needed is a cocktail of remedies that blends antitrust with ongoing regulatory oversight."
Wheeler argued that "we have reached the point in our digital trajectory where we need a new regulatory agency with digital DNA," adding that "if we're really serious about returning competition and consumer protect to the digital economy, it's simply not enough to look backward and redress a harm that has already occurred."
"We need to couple antitrust with a new vehicle for public-interest oversight to prevent abuses in the first place," he concluded.
FINAL DAY! This is urgent.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just hours left in our Spring Campaign, we're still falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The U.S. Justice Department announced Tuesday an antitrust lawsuit against Google--a filing that marks the biggest government case tackling tech power since the one targeting Microsoft in 1998.
The filing is joined by 11 states, all of which have Republican governors, as Reuters noted.
Rep. David Cicilline (D-R.I.) responded to the announcement by pointing to the House antitrust subcommittee's recent report finding that Google, along with other tech giants, holds monopoly power.
"This step is long overdue," Cicilline tweeted of the government's new lawsuit, adding, "It is time to restore competition online."
As CNN reported:
[The complaint] alleges in part that Google pays billions of dollars a year to device manufacturers likeApple, LG, Motorola, and Samsung and browser developers like Mozilla and Opera to be their default search engine and in many cases to prohibit them from dealing with Google's competitors. As a result, "Google effectively owns or controls search distribution channels accounting for roughly 80% of the general search queries in the United States."
What's more, the Washington Post added:
With this vast, unparalleled reach, Google further enriched itself through lucrative ads that appear alongside search results, the DOJ found. The massive profits from that business allowed Google to maintain its foothold and make it impossible for other search engines to compete, the lawsuit alleges.
Google, for its part, called the lawsuit "deeply flawed," said it was based on "dubious antitrust arguments," and claimed it will "make it harder for people to get the search services they want to use."
Attorney General William Barr--appointed by President Donald Trump--said in a statement the legal action was a "monumental case" that followed 16 months of the Justice Department's antitrust division collecting "convincing evidence" about the company he dubbed "the monopoly gatekeeper of the internet."
"Twenty-five years ago, the Department of Justice sued Microsoft, paving the way for a new wave of innovative tech companies--including Google," he explained. "The increased competition following the Microsoft case enabled Google to grow from a small start-up to an internet behemoth."
"Unfortunately," said Barr, "once Google itself gained dominance, it resorted to the same anti-competitive playbook."
Open Markets Institute, a research and advocacy group, framed the lawsuit as a "big moment."
In a Twitter thread Monday ahead of the announcement, the group wrote that "Google... acquired its dominance of the internet search market by bribing smartphone manufacturers and wireless operators not to install rival search engines on devices they sold."
Alex Harman, competition policy advocate at Public Citizen, suggested the lawsuit deserves little praise from anti-monopoly advocates because it amounted to merely "a thinly veiled political stunt."
"The Trump DOJ's narrow focus and alienation of the bipartisan state attorneys general is evidence of an unserious approach driven by politics and is likely to result in nothing more than a choreographed slap on the wrist for Google," Harman said.
Harman further framed the filing as "a missed opportunity to bring about a structural reckoning with one of the most powerful and wealthy companies in the world so that Trump and Barr can score political points" and pointed to state attorneys general as being better equipped to lead the charge.
That effort is still underway.
New York Attorney General Letitia James said following the DOJ announcement that the multi-state antitrust investigation into Google she's leading will continue, with parts of that probe set to conclude "in the coming weeks."
"If we decide to file a complaint," said James, "we would file a motion to consolidate our case with the DOJ's. We would then litigate the consolidated case cooperatively, much as we did in the Microsoft case."
While the government's filing targets Google, other tech giants could soon find themselves in similar territory.
According to the Associated Press, the new lawsuit could mark "an opening salvo ahead of other major government antitrust actions, given ongoing investigations of major tech companies including Apple, Amazon, and Facebook at both the Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission."
More, however, would still need to be done to address abuses committed by tech behemoths.
That's according to Tom Wheeler, former Federal Communications Commission chair under the Obama administration.
In an op-ed Tuesday at TIME, Wheeler wrote that the "abusive practices of the dominant digital platforms are so widespread and have become so embedded that there is no single solution. What is needed is a cocktail of remedies that blends antitrust with ongoing regulatory oversight."
Wheeler argued that "we have reached the point in our digital trajectory where we need a new regulatory agency with digital DNA," adding that "if we're really serious about returning competition and consumer protect to the digital economy, it's simply not enough to look backward and redress a harm that has already occurred."
"We need to couple antitrust with a new vehicle for public-interest oversight to prevent abuses in the first place," he concluded.
The U.S. Justice Department announced Tuesday an antitrust lawsuit against Google--a filing that marks the biggest government case tackling tech power since the one targeting Microsoft in 1998.
The filing is joined by 11 states, all of which have Republican governors, as Reuters noted.
Rep. David Cicilline (D-R.I.) responded to the announcement by pointing to the House antitrust subcommittee's recent report finding that Google, along with other tech giants, holds monopoly power.
"This step is long overdue," Cicilline tweeted of the government's new lawsuit, adding, "It is time to restore competition online."
As CNN reported:
[The complaint] alleges in part that Google pays billions of dollars a year to device manufacturers likeApple, LG, Motorola, and Samsung and browser developers like Mozilla and Opera to be their default search engine and in many cases to prohibit them from dealing with Google's competitors. As a result, "Google effectively owns or controls search distribution channels accounting for roughly 80% of the general search queries in the United States."
What's more, the Washington Post added:
With this vast, unparalleled reach, Google further enriched itself through lucrative ads that appear alongside search results, the DOJ found. The massive profits from that business allowed Google to maintain its foothold and make it impossible for other search engines to compete, the lawsuit alleges.
Google, for its part, called the lawsuit "deeply flawed," said it was based on "dubious antitrust arguments," and claimed it will "make it harder for people to get the search services they want to use."
Attorney General William Barr--appointed by President Donald Trump--said in a statement the legal action was a "monumental case" that followed 16 months of the Justice Department's antitrust division collecting "convincing evidence" about the company he dubbed "the monopoly gatekeeper of the internet."
"Twenty-five years ago, the Department of Justice sued Microsoft, paving the way for a new wave of innovative tech companies--including Google," he explained. "The increased competition following the Microsoft case enabled Google to grow from a small start-up to an internet behemoth."
"Unfortunately," said Barr, "once Google itself gained dominance, it resorted to the same anti-competitive playbook."
Open Markets Institute, a research and advocacy group, framed the lawsuit as a "big moment."
In a Twitter thread Monday ahead of the announcement, the group wrote that "Google... acquired its dominance of the internet search market by bribing smartphone manufacturers and wireless operators not to install rival search engines on devices they sold."
Alex Harman, competition policy advocate at Public Citizen, suggested the lawsuit deserves little praise from anti-monopoly advocates because it amounted to merely "a thinly veiled political stunt."
"The Trump DOJ's narrow focus and alienation of the bipartisan state attorneys general is evidence of an unserious approach driven by politics and is likely to result in nothing more than a choreographed slap on the wrist for Google," Harman said.
Harman further framed the filing as "a missed opportunity to bring about a structural reckoning with one of the most powerful and wealthy companies in the world so that Trump and Barr can score political points" and pointed to state attorneys general as being better equipped to lead the charge.
That effort is still underway.
New York Attorney General Letitia James said following the DOJ announcement that the multi-state antitrust investigation into Google she's leading will continue, with parts of that probe set to conclude "in the coming weeks."
"If we decide to file a complaint," said James, "we would file a motion to consolidate our case with the DOJ's. We would then litigate the consolidated case cooperatively, much as we did in the Microsoft case."
While the government's filing targets Google, other tech giants could soon find themselves in similar territory.
According to the Associated Press, the new lawsuit could mark "an opening salvo ahead of other major government antitrust actions, given ongoing investigations of major tech companies including Apple, Amazon, and Facebook at both the Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission."
More, however, would still need to be done to address abuses committed by tech behemoths.
That's according to Tom Wheeler, former Federal Communications Commission chair under the Obama administration.
In an op-ed Tuesday at TIME, Wheeler wrote that the "abusive practices of the dominant digital platforms are so widespread and have become so embedded that there is no single solution. What is needed is a cocktail of remedies that blends antitrust with ongoing regulatory oversight."
Wheeler argued that "we have reached the point in our digital trajectory where we need a new regulatory agency with digital DNA," adding that "if we're really serious about returning competition and consumer protect to the digital economy, it's simply not enough to look backward and redress a harm that has already occurred."
"We need to couple antitrust with a new vehicle for public-interest oversight to prevent abuses in the first place," he concluded.