May, 22 2015, 03:30pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
John Sheehan, Adirondack Council, (518) 441-1340
Lori Fisher, Lake Champlain Committee, (802) 658-1421, lorif@lakechamplaincommittee.org
Mollie Matteson, Center for Biological Diversity, (802) 318-1487, mmatteson@biologicaldiversity.org
Neil Woodworth. Adirondack Mountain Club, (518) 669-0128, neilwoody@gmail.com
New York Requires Full Environmental Study on Tar Sands Oil Transport by Rail to Albany Via Adirondacks, Lake Champlain
Four conservation organizations from the Adirondack Park and Champlain Valley today praised a decision by New York's Department of Environmental Conservation to require a full environmental impact statement from a company seeking permission to import heavy crude oil from Canada.
They also praised U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Regional Director Judith Enck, who sent a letter to the DEC on May 15 noting that the state had underestimated the potential for new air pollution emissions from the facility. State air pollution permits must comply with the federal Clean Air Act.
ALBANY, N.Y.
Four conservation organizations from the Adirondack Park and Champlain Valley today praised a decision by New York's Department of Environmental Conservation to require a full environmental impact statement from a company seeking permission to import heavy crude oil from Canada.
They also praised U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Regional Director Judith Enck, who sent a letter to the DEC on May 15 noting that the state had underestimated the potential for new air pollution emissions from the facility. State air pollution permits must comply with the federal Clean Air Act.
Global Companies LLC of Massachusetts had sought a state air pollution permit modification from the DEC so it could install an oil-heating facility at the Port of Albany. Global intends to transfer thick tar sands crude oil from rail cars to storage tanks, and then on to ships in the port.
Trains carrying the oil would travel more than 130 miles along the shore of Lake Champlain, including more than 100 miles of which are inside the Adirondack Park. The rails pass through a dozen Adirondack communities and cross several major rivers that feed the lake. Lake Champlain provides drinking water for 188,000 people.
Tar sands oil is thicker than the North Dakota Bakken crude oil currently being shipped by rail through the Adirondacks to Albany. It must be heated before it can be pumped in cold weather and it sinks in water, making clean-up virtually impossible.
"We are very pleased the DEC chose to consider much more than just the potential for increased air pollution when it decided to order a full environmental review of this project application," said Neil Woodworth, executive director of the Adirondack Mountain Club. "The State Environmental Quality Review Act obligates DEC to consider all potential environmental impacts. With so much at stake, DEC needed to take a much broader look."
"The DEC's air permit review gives the department jurisdiction over any environmental impact caused by the changes being made at the Port of Albany, including any increased danger to the health and purity of Lake Champlain and the rivers that feed it," said William C. Janeway, executive director of the Adirondack Council. "That's not just the law; it's the right thing to do. Clean water is the Adirondack Park's most valuable asset. It is the reason why the Adirondack Park and Forest Preserve were created more than a century ago. Our visitors and our communities need it."
"We believe that the DEC has an obligation to protect our waterways and public health and safety, so we are pleased it will be taking a much more careful look at the potential environmental consequences of a derailment in sensitive locations," said Lori Fisher, executive director of the Lake Champlain Committee. "A spill along much of this line could significantly pollute Lake Champlain. That means water pollution contamination of a drinking water supply for more than 180,000 local residents. That's not a local impact, confined to Albany. That's an interstate and international impact."
"Just since the beginning of 2015, there have been five major oil train derailments in the U.S. and Canada, underscoring the tremendous risk posed by the massive increase in the amount of crude oil transported by trains in recent years," said Mollie Matteson of the Center for Biological Diversity. "The state's decision to examine the very real threat of tar sands demonstrates the importance of this iconic water body, and the communities along the tracks that will suffer when a train derailment occurs."
A single tar sands oil spill in the Kalamazoo River in Michigan has cost more than $1 billion over the past three years and is not yet cleaned up. Because tar sands oil sinks in water, recovery rates of heavy crude spilled in water are usually less than 5 percent.
Recent derailments in the U.S. and Canada resulted in fires and explosions in relatively remote locations, sparing more populated areas from a devastating conflagration such as the one that occurred in July 2013 in Lac Megantic, Quebec, where 47 people were killed by an oil train derailment.
At the Center for Biological Diversity, we believe that the welfare of human beings is deeply linked to nature — to the existence in our world of a vast diversity of wild animals and plants. Because diversity has intrinsic value, and because its loss impoverishes society, we work to secure a future for all species, great and small, hovering on the brink of extinction. We do so through science, law and creative media, with a focus on protecting the lands, waters and climate that species need to survive.
(520) 623-5252LATEST NEWS
Vermont Sued for New Law Requiring Big Oil to Pay for Climate Damage
'For too long, giant fossil fuel companies have knowingly lit the match of climate disruption'
Jan 05, 2025
The US Chamber of Commerce and the American Petroleum Institute - representing the biggest fossil fuel companies in the world - are suing the State of Vermont over its new law requiring fossil fuel companies to pay a share of the state's damage caused by climate change.
The lawsuit, filed last Monday in the US District Court for the District of Vermont, asks a state court to prevent Vermont from enforcing the law passed last year. Vermont became the first state in the country to enact the law after it suffered over $1 billion in damages from catastrophic summer flooding and other extreme weather.
Vermont’s Attorney General’s Office said as of Friday, Jan. 3, they had not been served with the lawsuit.
The lawsuit argues that the U.S. Constitution precludes the act and that the federal Clean Air Act preempts state law. It also claims that the law violates domestic and foreign commerce clauses by discriminating “against the important interest of other states by targeting large energy companies located outside of Vermont.”
The Chamber and the American Petroleum Institute argue that the federal government is already addressing climate change. Because greenhouse gases come from billions of individual sources, they claim it has been impossible to measure “accurately and fairly” the impact of emissions from a particular entity in a specific location over decades.
“For too long, giant fossil fuel companies have knowingly lit the match of climate disruption without being required to do a thing to put out the fire,” Paul Burns, executive director of the Vermont Public Interest Research Group, said in a statement. “Finally, maybe for the first time anywhere, Vermont is going to hold the companies most responsible for climate-driven floods, fires and heat waves financially accountable for a fair share of the damages they’ve caused.”
The complaint is an essential legal test as more states consider holding fossil fuels liable for expensive global warming-intensified events like floods, fires, and more. Maryland and Massachusetts are among the states expected to pursue similar legislation, modeled after the federal law known as Superfund, in 2025.
New York Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) signed a similar climate bill into law - the Climate Change Superfund Act- on Dec. 26, pointing to the need to fund climate adaptation projects.
Downtown Montpelier, Vermont was under water on Monday, July 10, 2023 caused by the flooding of the Winooski River. (Photo: John Tully for The Washington Post via Getty Images)
Heavy Rains Cause Catastrophic Flooding In Southern Vermont (Photo by Scott Eisen/Getty Images)
Flooding is seen in downtown Montpelier, Vermont (Photo: John Tully for The Washington Post via Getty Images)
Keep ReadingShow Less
Renowned Washington Post Cartoonist Quits After Refusal to Publish Critique of Jeff Bezos
Jan 04, 2025
Pulitzer Prize-winning cartoonist Ann Telnaes has resigned from the Washington Post, where she has worked since 2008, due to what she claims was editorial interference.
Telnaes claimed an editor at the paper killed her draft cartoon depicting Washington Post owner Jeff Bezos and other billionaire tech and media chief executives groveling on their knees at the feet of President-elect Donald Trump.
Along with Bezos, Telnaes depicted Meta founder Mark Zuckerberg and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman bringing Trump sacks of cash. Los Angeles Times owner and billionaire Patrick Soon-Shiong was shown with a tube of lipstick.
In a post to her Substack, Telnaes wrote:
“I have had editorial feedback and productive conversations – and some differences – about cartoons I have submitted for publication, but in all that time, I’ve never had a cartoon killed because of who or what I chose to aim my pen at. Until now.”
"As an editorial cartoonist, my job is to hold powerful people and institutions accountable. For the first time, my editor prevented me from doing that critical job. So I have decided to leave the Post. I doubt my decision will cause much of a stir and that it will be dismissed because I’m just a cartoonist. But I will not stop holding truth to power through my cartooning because, as they say, “Democracy dies in darkness.”
Over three hundred thousand people canceled their digital subscriptions after Jeff Bezos decided to squash a Washington Post endorsement of Kamala Harris in October.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Biden Greenlights 'Racist' and 'Sociopathic' $8B Arms Sale to Israel
Multiple human rights organizations and international bodies have accused Israel of committing genocide in Gaza
Jan 04, 2025
The administration of US President Joe Biden announced on Saturday an arms sale to Israel valued at $8 billion, just ahead of President-elect Donald Trump's return to the White House.
Biden has repeatedly rejected calls to suspend military backing for Israel because of the number of civilians killed during the war in Gaza. Israel has killed more than 45,000 people in Gaza, primarily women and children.
The sale includes medium-range air-to-air missiles, 155mm projectile artillery shells for long-range targeting, Hellfire AGM-114 missiles, 500-pound bombs, and more.
Human rights groups, former State Department officials, and Democratic lawmakers have urged the Biden administration to halt arms sales to Israel, citing violations of US laws, including the Leahy Law, as well as international laws and human rights.
The Leahy Law, named after former Sen. Patrick Leahy, requires the US to withhold military assistance from foreign military or law enforcement units if there is credible evidence of human rights violations.
The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the nation’s most significant Muslim civil rights and advocacy organization, today called Biden’s new $8 billion arms deal “racist” and “sociopathic.”
Multiple human rights organizations and international bodies have accused Israel of committing genocide in Gaza. The International Criminal Court (ICC) issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant for committing war crimes.
The US is, by far, the biggest supplier of weapons to Israel, having helped it build one of the most technologically sophisticated militaries in the world.
CAIR National Executive Director Nihad Awad said on Saturday:
“We strongly condemn the Biden administration for its unbelievable and criminal decision to send another $8 billion worth of American weapons to the government of indicted war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu instead of using American leverage to force an end to the genocide in Gaza.
“Only racists who do not view people of color as equally human, and sociopaths who delight in funding mass slaughter, could send Netanyahu even more bombs while his government openly kidnaps doctors, destroys hospitals, and exterminates the last survivors in northern Gaza.
“If President Biden is actually the person who approved this new $8 billion arms sale, then he is a war criminal who belongs in a cell at The Hague alongside Netanyahu. But if Antony Blinken, Brett McGurk, Jake Sullivan, and other aides are making these unconscionable decisions as shadow presidents, then anyone with a conscience in the administration should speak up now about their abuses of power.”
According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), the US accounted for 69% of Israel's imports of major conventional arms between 2019 and 2023.
On the other hand, incoming President-elect Donald Trump has also pledged unwavering support for Israel and has never committed to supporting an independent Palestinian state.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular