June, 15 2016, 12:45pm EDT
Report: Pesticide Industry Delaying Bee Protections Across US
Bayer, Syngenta, Monsanto influence shaping federal and state pollinator plans
WASHINGTON
Amid an ongoing pollinator crisis that threatens our food system, a new report issued today by Friends of the Earth documents how the pesticide industry has weakened and delayed pesticide reforms and is shaping new pollinator "protection" plans nationwide that do little to protect bees, but a lot to protect industry profits.
The investigation, titled "Buzz Kill: How the Pesticide Industry is Clipping the Wings of Bee Protection Efforts Across the U.S.," reveals an array of pesticide industry tactics to slow urgently needed pollinator protection measures at federal and state levels:
* Lobbying intensively to delay bee protections: The industry is spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on lobbying to delay state and federal action on the pesticides they manufacture. As a result, state pollinator protection plans across the U.S. are falling short in several ways, including:
- State pollinator protection plans currently provide more protections for pesticides and pesticide users than for bee keepers and bee colonies.
- Pesticide industry influence is pervasive throughout states' legislative and regulatory planning efforts.
- Plans lack metrics to measure effectiveness, improvement or failure.
* Cycling through the revolving door: The pesticide industry has infiltrated federal regulatory agencies via the "revolving door." In hundreds of documented cases, employees of the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Environmental Protection Agency have shuffled between regulatory agencies and companies including Bayer, Syngenta and Monsanto.
* Using "public-private" partnerships to cast doubt on pesticide problems: Pesticide manufacturers have cultivated strategic partnerships with public agencies and academic groups that call into question pesticides' culpability and that help bolster the companies' credibility.
* Swaying science and education: The pesticide industry has directly funded or influenced science by donating to education initiatives and building strategic alliances with academics.
"Pesticide companies are successfully pulling the wool over the eyes of our policy makers, which has resulted in a patchwork of initiatives by our state and federal government to that do little to curb or restrict pesticides," said Tiffany Finck-Haynes, food futures campaigner with Friends of the Earth. "Our government is giving more weight to the pesticide industry than to protecting bees, beekeepers, our food supply and environment. It is critical for policymakers to stand up for the long-term health of our food system, not the short-term profits of companies that manufacture a leading cause of bee declines."
This week, a national "Keep the Hives Alive Tour" kicked off June 13-23, with stops in South Dakota, Minnesota, Michigan, Pennsylvania and North Carolina, to mark National Pollinator Week. At the end of the tour, beekeepers, farmers, farmworkers, scientists and advocates will deliver a truck load of 2.64 million dead bees to Washington, D.C. to urge the EPA, USDA and Congress to take action on toxic pesticides and support sustainable agriculture.
Buzz Kill builds on FOE's 2014 "Follow the Honey" report, which revealed how chemical companies Bayer, Syngenta and Monsanto employ deceptive tobacco-style public relations tactics to:
* manufacture doubt about scientific findings on pollinator die-offs;
* convince politicians to delay action on neonicotinoid pesticides (a leading contributor to bee declines);
* and protect chemical industry sales and profits at the expense of bees and our food system.
Today's report details how new state pollinator protection plans, many still unfinished, have been heavily influenced by pesticide industry interests.
"Pesticide companies appear to have succeeded in delaying regulatory action on the pesticides they manufacture and market, but enough is enough," said Finck-Haynes. "Beekeepers, farmers, farmworkers, scientists and advocates across the country are uniting to demand real action by our government to protect pollinators and support sustainable agriculture."
Both reports - "Buzz Kill: How the Pesticide Industry is Clipping the Wings of Bee Protection Efforts Across the U.S." and "Follow the Honey: 7 ways pesticide companies are spinning the bee crisis to protect profits" - can be found at www.foe.org/beeaction.
Friends of the Earth fights for a more healthy and just world. Together we speak truth to power and expose those who endanger the health of people and the planet for corporate profit. We organize to build long-term political power and campaign to change the rules of our economic and political systems that create injustice and destroy nature.
(202) 783-7400LATEST NEWS
Azerbaijan's New Climate Fund, Easy on Fossil Fuel Producers, Denounced as 'Smoke Screen'
The country's new climate finance fund—an initiative watered down by fossil fuel producers—draws criticism as the oil-producing country prepares to host the U.N. climate summit in November.
Jul 12, 2024
Climate campaigners on Thursday dismissed Azerbaijan's plan for a $500 million climate investment fund, arguing that it was a small, poorly designed initiative meant to distract from the nation's oil production.
The criticism came following news that Azerbaijan, which is seeking to bolster its green credentials as it prepares to host the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP29) in November, plans to raise at least $500 million of financing for clean energy investments in the Global South. The money would come from fossil fuel producers, including the state-owned Azerbaijani company SOCAR.
Azerbaijani officials considered introducing a levy on fossil fuel producers to raise money for the fund but, after facing opposition from oil-producing Gulf countries, opted for a voluntary, public-private investment model, an anonymous source toldReuters.
350.org called Azerbaijan's plan a "commercial" venture and said "we must distinguish profit-driven investments from genuine efforts," in a statement.
"The role of a COP presidency is to drive forward highly concessional climate finance, not profit from it," said Andreas Sieber, associate director of policy and campaigns. "We demand accountability through tax levies, not token charity, in this climate emergency. Those responsible for the climate crisis must pay for what they have created."
🧵1/4
BREAKING: @COP29_AZ plans a $500mn fund with the money of #fossilfuel industry to fund the energy transition - sounds good at first, but its a charade to distract us from the #fossil industrys deadly unwillingness to transition. Lets unpack:https://t.co/R1A6gP0x1S
— Andreas Sieber (@ClimateAndreas) July 11, 2024
Azerbaijan's new fund marks the second year in a row that an oil-producing nation has sought to deflect criticism by announcing a climate finance venture ahead of the U.N. summit.
The United Arab Emirates (UAE), which hosted COP28 last year, announced a far larger climate investment fund, with a $30 billion initial investment and a goal of raising $250 billion. Forbesreported after COP28 that "the reality is the fund is an investment tool with a primary purpose of profits for the investors."
Like the UAE last year, Azerbaijan faces questions as its commitment to climate action.
"Several diplomats and negotiators have privately expressed concerns that Azerbaijan, which relies heavily on oil and gas revenues, is fundamentally reluctant to address the question of how to shift away from fossil fuels," The Financial Timesreported.
In January, Azerbaijan appointed a 20-year oil and gas veteran to lead COP29 talks, drawing criticism from environmental groups. A Global Witness report revealed that the country plans not to phase out fossil fuel use, per an international agreement made at COP28, but to raise gas production by one-third in the next decade.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Sunrise Movement to Biden: For Planet's Sake—and Your Climate Legacy—Step Aside
"Joe Biden's next climate legacy-defining act must be to pass the torch to a new nominee," says Sunrise Movement executive director Aru Shiney-Ajay.
Jul 12, 2024
The head of a leading U.S. climate action group on Friday joined nearly 20 congressional lawmakers and the growing list of Democratic Party insiders, pundits, and others who are imploring President Joe Biden to step aside and let another Democrat run against former President Donald Trump in November's election.
"For the future of our democracy and our planet, we must defeat Trump this November. If Trump wins, he will demolish President Biden's historic climate achievements, such as the Inflation Reduction Act and American Climate Corps," Sunrise Movement executive director Aru Shiney-Ajay said in a statement. "Another Trump presidency would cause catastrophic and irreversible damage to our climate."
According to Shiney-Ajay:
The Democratic Party must seriously assess whether Joe Biden can successfully convince voters and energize volunteers. After speaking with young people around the country over the last few weeks, I'm concerned that Joe Biden isn't positioned to mobilize young people and win in November.
To be very clear, regardless of who the Democratic candidate is, our plan is the same: to persuade young voters to turn out for the Democratic nominee in order to defeat Trump. With another ticket that energizes young volunteers, we could contact up to twice as many voters this fall.
"To young people: Losing this election could alter the rest of our lives. In order to fight for our generation and our future, we must vote for the Democratic nominee," Shiney-Ajay stressed. "Joe Biden's next climate legacy-defining act must be to pass the torch to a new nominee."
Trump, who has habitually called human-caused climate change a "hoax," filled his administration with officials who were criticized for being inimical to their respective agencies' stated missions. Some of his key appointees—including Rex Tillerson, his first secretary of state, and Ryan Zinke, who headed the Interior Department—were former fossil fuel executives or had track records of supporting the oil, gas, and coal industries.
The debate over Biden's future as the Democratic nominee comes as nearly 20 members of Congress have called on the president to stand down in favor of another candidate, and as poll after poll show him losing to Trump amid a glaring lack of enthusiasm for his candidacy.
"In 2020, Biden was able to energize young people to not only vote, but urge their friends, parents, and neighbors to do the same," said Shiney-Ajay. "We saw that energy at Sunrise, when our volunteers contacted 3.5 million young voters urging them to vote for Biden. Since the debate, already low enthusiasm for Biden has continued to drop."
"The stakes are too high," she added. "We can't afford to ignore the warning signs in front of us."
Keep ReadingShow Less
NGOs Urge UK Labour Government to End 'Complicity in Israeli Crimes' in Gaza
"We are asking this government for leadership and to take a just decision, for the sake of Palestinians in Gaza who are living through 'hell on Earth,'" said six rights groups.
Jul 12, 2024
A week after the British Labour Party won control of the United Kingdom's government, six rights organizations called on Prime Minister Keir Starmer to bring the country "back from the brink" and restore its "credibility on the international stage" by ending its military support for Israel.
"The Labour Party now has the chance to start restoring some credibility by ensuring the U.K. abides by international law, thereby extricating the U.K. from the indelible stain of complicity in Israeli crimes that deeply shock the conscience of humanity," wrote the British Global Legal Action Network (GLAN) and Al-Haq, based in Palestine.
The groups wrote the letter with the support of the International Center of Justice for Palestinians, War on Want, the Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT), and the Palestine Solidarity Campaign.
Addressing Starmer along with newly appointed Foreign Secretary David Lammy and Secretary of State for Business and Trade Jonathan Reynolds, the groups reminded the prime minister that following his election, he promised Britons that the "sunlight of hope was shining once again" after 14 years of Conservative rule, and called Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to say there is a "clear and urgent need for a cease-fire."
"Calls for a cease-fire are evidently not enough, in particular when the U.K. is arming one party to the conflict," wrote the groups, pointing out that earlier this week Palestinians in northern Gaza reported that recent bombing there has "matched October 2023 in its intensity—with levels of destruction not witnessed since World War II, nearly all civilian infrastructure is completely destroyed."
"We are asking this government for leadership and to take a just decision, for the sake of Palestinians in Gaza who are living through 'hell on Earth,'" they wrote. "The world should have put an end to their unimaginable suffering a long time ago. Labour must suspend, revoke, and refuse all arms licenses for Israel now."
The U.K. licensed about £859,381 ($1.09 million) of weapons to Israel in the last three months of 2023, as the Israel Defense Forces relentlessly attacked Gaza and blocked nearly all humanitarian aid, leading to what 10 independent United Nations experts this week said is now famine across the enclave.
"The new Labour government's calls for a cease-fire are meaningless while it continues to arm Israel. British weapons have killed too many Palestinians," said GLAN lawyer Charlotte Andrews-Briscoe. "This government knows that the only lawful and moral decision is to stop arming Israel. Britons have voted for change: This government must deliver that change."
On social media, GLAN amplified a video posted by Starmer on Sunday in which he pledged to "restore politics as a force for good."
"We are calling on Keir Starmer to put these words into action," said the legal group.
When the war on Gaza's population of 2.3 million people ends, said the groups, Starmer's government must expect that there will be "a reckoning in which Israel will be found to have committed mass atrocities."
But the organizations called on Starmer—who, months before he called on Netanyahu to agree to a cease-fire, said Israel had "the right" to withhold power and water from Gaza—to see that ending military support for Israel "is not only the legal obligation of the U.K., it is a moral obligation."
"Schoolchildren will learn about this period for years to come, just as we have all learned about past genocides and wondered how they could be allowed to happen," reads the letter. "Will they read about a new Labour government that acted with respect for the sanctity of all human life?"
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular