

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Thanu Yakupitiyage, US Communications, thanu@350.org; 413-687-5160
Monica Mohapatra, US Communications, monica.mohapatra@350.org
List of Actions
[For schedule, see below]
Duluth, Minnesota - Contact: Brett Benson, brett@mn350.org & Margaret Breen, margaret@mn350.org
Gichi-gami gathering: On Saturday, September 28th, hundreds from across the Midwest will gather on the shores of Gichi-gami -- Lake Superior -- to stand up against the proposed Enbridge Line 3 tar sands pipeline. They will rally, march and gather in a festival on the shores of Gichi-gami to send a clear message to the Governor, MN's state agencies, and their elected representatives: "Minnesotans stand together to protect what we love and say STOP Line 3 and other pipelines that threaten our water, climate, and communities."
Portland, Oregon - Contact: Chris Palmer, chris@350pdx.org, 971-712-4152
Holding Our City Accountable - Act on Climate! - This isan action against Zenith Energy, a Houston-based company currently expanding an old asphalt facility in Portland's industrial district into a tar sands crude import and storage facility. Communities in Portland are seeing quadruple the amount of oil "bomb" trains traveling through our City, putting all of us at risk. The City of Portland has the ability to legally stop Zenith's expansion of tar sands crude imports, but is moving too slowly. We will target the City as the key decision makers, and put an end to the most dangerous and polluting form of energy on the planet from moving through our communities. There will be a vigil on September 24, and a mass action on September 27.
San Diego, California - Contact: Peter Sloan, peterkennethsloan@gmail.com
There will be several actions in San Diego, where students have staged a die-in and now diverse youth and adult coalitions will convene in actions to escalate pressure on San Diego electeds. They will continue their our year-long Raise the Alarm campaign and focus on getting representatives to support a Green New Deal resolution in San Diego.
Boston, Massachusetts - Contact: Vignesh Ramachandran, vignesh@betterfutureproject.org
In Boston, activists will kick off a week of escalated actions to resist and demand accountability for environmental injustice in the city and state. Governor Charlie Baker has repeatedly shown disregard for communities directly impacted by the climate crisis, approving the Weymouth Compressor Station and appointing staff who have direct ties to fossil fuel companies. Not only that, but he has not implemented Governor Patrick's environmental justice executive order. His administration has had a hand in moving forward an electrical substation in East Boston, where a primarily Spanish-speaking community was given little change for public engagement on a station that would channel fossil fuel powered energy into an already overburdened communities. This is why Massachusetts activists are kicking off Charlie's Climate Catastrophe Tour with a 9 foot tall puppet of the Governor, where "he" visits various sites where he and his administration have failed the public because they are beholden to the interests of the fossil fuel industry and corporations.
Washington, D.C. - Contact: Kaela Bamberger, kaelabamberger@gmail.com
On September 23rd, activists are going to shut down DC. They will block key infrastructure to stop business-as-usual, bringing the whole city to a gridlocked standstill. Parents, workers, college students, and everyone who is concerned about the climate crisis will skip work and school and put off their other responsibilities to take action on the climate crisis.Profile in the Guardian / Profile in Curbed DC
Denver, Colorado - Contact: Julia Willliams, outreach@350colorado.org
There will be a series of actions after the 20th, including "Protect the Frontlines From Fracking" - On September 26th, activists in Colorado will shut down the Suncor oil refinery in Denver, a fossil fuel project which annually spews 8.5 tons of hydrogen cynanide into low-income Denver neighborhoods. On the 29th, there will be an action to protest how neighborhood fracking is plaguing Colorado communities. From dozens of explosions, polluted air, and devastating health impacts - directly impacted communities are ready to end fracking in Colorado.
Seattle, Washington - Contact: Emily Johnston, enjohnston@gmail.com
In Seattle, actions will highlight the fragility of the Salish Sea, with everything from a cruise ship protest to a 4-day walk. From September 20th to 24, the Walk to Protect & Restore the Salish Sea 2019 Climate Emergency will show people of the Salish Sea rising to protect the sacred. The 4-day walk will be to stand in solidarity with Salish Sea tribes to ensure their treaty rights are honored and respected and for other nations to have their unceded territories and natural laws honored and respected. A second Salish Sea protection action will take place on 9/26: Tribal, non-tribal, First Nations, Canadian, American, fishers, elders, children, families, youth, will show that while they may speak with many voices, they are of one mind when it comes to protecting their shared home.
Bow, New Hampshire - Contact: Rebecca Beaulieu, rebecca350NH@gmail.com
The last major coal-fired power plant in New England without a shut-down date is the Merrimack Generating Station in Bow, New Hampshire. On September 28th, after a week of climate action around the globe, a huge coalition of citizens will participate in nonviolent direct action to shut down the plant. Website / Watch their latest video here. / Read a blog from their practice action.
Burlington, Vermont - Contact: Lily Jacobson, lily@350vt.org & Julia Macuga, resist@350vt.org
One of Vermont's top-earning lobbying firms, MMR, LLC, is making their money by destroying lives. Their clients includes Vermont Gas, ExxonMobil, CoreCivic, AstraZeneca, Procter and Gamble, Johnson&Johnson, Walmart-- basically any business that supports systems of oppression and the destruction of lives, they lobby for. They're complicit in helping the fossil fuel industry to intensify the climate crisis and drive mass migrations, then detaining migrants trying to escape the unstable conditions that the climate crisis has created. September 25th we'll be at Vermont's capital for a press event, demanding that MMR drops these clients.
Bay Area (SF), California
DISRUPT: CLIMATE DESTRUCTION IN THE SUITES - CREATE: SOLUTIONS IN THE STREETS will interrupt business as usual in the Downtown San Francisco financial district on September 25. Led by frontline groups such as Idle No More and 1000 Grandmothers, strikers will "name those responsible for destroying life as we know it." In addition to the action against fossil fuel finance, artists will paint 20 street murals envisioning climate justice. Media Advisory
350 is building a future that's just, prosperous, equitable and safe from the effects of the climate crisis. We're an international movement of ordinary people working to end the age of fossil fuels and build a world of community-led renewable energy for all.
Delaware is home to more corporations than people. Human people, that is, as under longstanding state law and the US Supreme Court's infamous 2010 ruling, corporations are people, too.
A judge in Delaware—a state with more registered business entities than people—ruled Monday in favor of a small town that allows corporations to vote in local elections.
Delaware Superior Court Judge Craig Karsnitz ruled that the town of Fenwick Island, population 400, did not violate the state Constitution by permitting business entities—which make up 12% of the town's "population"—to vote in municipal elections, as case plaintiff the ACLU of Delaware had claimed.
"What is a 'person?' When one cuts to the heart of this case, that is the question," Karsnitz wrote to open his 20-page ruling.
‼️‼️Delaware Superior Court upholds a municipal ordinance allowing individuals to cast votes on behalf of LLCs, trusts, and corporations in local elections against a challenge that the ordinance constitutes unlawful vote dilution for real persons under the state constitution. aboutblaw.com/blQg
[image or embed]
— Anthony Michael Kreis (@anthonymkreis.bsky.social) May 27, 2026 at 1:46 PM
"According to the law, a person is anyone or anything that can initiate and be subject to legal proceedings. By this conception, any adult, corporation, or institution is a person, but a minor is not a person, a fetus is not a person, and a humanoid robot... is not a person," the ruling continues. "This highlights that legal personhood is dependent solely on legal recognition."
The judge noted that in 2008, the Delaware General Assembly amended Fenwick Island's charter "to expand its voter registration rolls to allow individuals to cast votes on behalf of trusts, limited liability companies, partnerships, and corporations that own property in Fenwick."
"Today, the overwhelming majority of legal entity property owners in Fenwick registered to vote, and on whose behalf votes are cast, are trusts," Karsnitz added.
"I appreciate that Plaintiff may disagree with Delaware’s policy of authorizing certain municipalities to allow voting on behalf of entity property owners," the judge wrote.
"Visions of faceless large corporations, or even HAL, controlling a small town are frightening and the stuff of science fiction," he continued," referring to the malevolent artificial intelligence-powered computer in Stanley Kubrick's 1968 film version of Arthur C. Clarke's 2001: A Space Odyssey. "However, Plaintiff has not demonstrated that this policy violates the principle of one person/entity/one vote."
"Plaintiff points to no other persuasive independent authority than the Elections Clause of the Delaware Constitution itself," Karsnitz concluded. "And matters of policy are appropriately left to legislative bodies, not the courts."
Fenwick Island Mayor Natalie Magdeburger told Reuters earlier this year that "a property owner who pays taxes and is subject to our ordinances should have a say in who represents them on our Town Council."
Meanwhile, the ACLU of Delaware contends that "with over 2 million business entities incorporated in Delaware–roughly double the amount of actual people living in the state–the people of Delaware risk having their voices drowned out when towns like Fenwick Island allow corporate voting."
Karsnitz's ruling does not mention Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the 2010 US Supreme Court decision affirming that political spending by corporations, nonprofit organizations, labor unions, and other groups is a form of free speech protected by the 1st Amendment that government cannot restrict. The decision ushered in the era of super PACs—which can raise unlimited amounts of money to spend on campaigns—and secret spending on elections with so-called “dark money.”
While Delaware's corporate personhood laws long predate Citizens United, numerous critics of Monday's ruling referred to the case, including the progressive legal advocacy group Demand Justice.
"Corporations aren't people," the group asserted on X. "They don't have kids in local schools, they don't drink the water, they can’t be jailed for crimes, and they shouldn't get a vote."
Some compared Hawaii, where Democratic Gov. Josh Green recently signed legislation clarifying that corporations are not people, with Delaware.
"Hawaii made a move to rein in Citizens United," writer Van Dennis posted on X, "and Delaware responded, "The fuck you are."
"The 'no more foreign wars' president just threatened to attack yet another country," said one critic.
President Donald Trump on Wednesday threatened to "blow up" Oman if the US ally works with Iran to reopen and jointly manage the Strait of Hormuz.
Responding to reporting by Iranian state media that Iran and Oman were negotiating an agreement to jointly manage the Strait of Hormuz—through which around 20% of the world's oil was shipped before the illegal US-Israeli war of choice on Iran—Trump said that "nobody's gonna control" the vital waterway.
"We're gonna watch over it, but nobody's gonna control it," the president continued. "That's part of the negotiation that we have."
Donald Trump: "Oman will behave just like everybody else, or we'll have to blow them up."The "no more foreign wars" president just threatened to attack yet another country.
[image or embed]
— Home of the Brave (@ofthebraveusa.bsky.social) May 27, 2026 at 10:15 AM
"It's international waters, and Oman will behave just like everybody else, or we'll have to blow them up," Trump added. "They understand that; they'll be fine."
The US State Department posted a captioned video of Trump's remarks, removing all doubt about whether he indeed threatened an ally with which the United States has had a strategically important partnership for generations.
A defense cooperation agreement signed in 1980 allows US forces to use Omani military bases, including facilities used for logistics, surveillance, and regional operations. The two countries periodically hold joint military exercises and cooperate on counterterrorism and maritime security—especially regarding threats to Gulf shipping lanes.
The countries have also had a free trade agreement in effect since 2009, and the president's business organization is currently building Trump International Oman, a controversial $500 million luxury hotel, golf course, villa, and resort development near the capital, Muscat.
In which Biff forgets about the Trump golf course and hotel grift he is running in Oman
[image or embed]
— Tom Hearden (@followtheh.bsky.social) May 27, 2026 at 10:20 AM
Oman has also been a trusted mediator between the US and countries including Iran. Omani Foreign Minister Badr Albusaidi publicly said that a deal to avert the Iran War was "within our reach" as Trump ordered bombing to commence.
Trump's remarks suggested that US and Iranian negotiators are not as close to a deal to end the 88-day war—in which US and Israeli forces have killed thousands of Iranians and global energy prices have soared—as the president has claimed.
"We should be the party that says 'Donald Trump, end this war, we're going to support the negotiation'—and then we're not going to get into these wars in the future."
Congressman Ro Khanna on Tuesday suggested Democratic voters who believe the party lacks "principles," as a number of respondents said in a new poll, have understandable questions about what Democrats stands for, as he denounced recent comments from several lawmakers who have attacked President Donald Trump for not being hawkish enough when it comes to the war he started in Iran.
"People want a Democratic Party that's going to stand for things, that stands as the party that's anti-war," Khanna told Chris Hayes on MS NOW.
“And we should be the party that says, ‘Donald Trump, end this war, we’re going to support the negotiation’—and then we’re going to not get into these wars in the future,” he added.
Khanna accused his colleagues of sending the message: “Donald Trump, go blow up more things! Why aren’t you destroying more of Iran?”
“I’m not one of those Democrats,” said the congressman, who introduced a war powers resolution with Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) to stop Trump from launching unauthorized strikes against Iran. “I’m one of the people saying, ‘Yes, let’s get a negotiated settlement. Let’s work toward ending this war.’”
“The Democrats should be for ending this war and be against more of these foreign interventions,” said Khanna. “The last thing we want is to goad Donald Trump into getting us into more conflict there.”
"We should be the party that says 'Donald Trump, end this war, we're going to support the negotiation' — and then we're not going to get into these wars in the future"
@RoKhanna to @ChrisLHayes on some Dems attacking Trump from the right over Iran dealpic.twitter.com/Rxbd7e1iJ6
— Just Foreign Policy (@justfp) May 27, 2026
As examples of what Khanna is talking about, influential Democrats including Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.) and Sens. Cory Booker (D-NJ) and Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) have spent the last several days provoking the president over Iran, and by complaining that the deal to end the war isn't tough enough on the country, which the US and Israel began preemptively attacking in February in violation of international law.
More than 3,400 people have been killed in Iran since the war started, while Israel has expanded hostilities to Lebanon, killing more than 3,000 people. The casualties in Iran have included about 150 people, mostly children, who were killed in an attack on a girls' school when the war started; Amnesty International has called for the US to be held to account for the bombing. A number of other schools have also been attacked, as well as medical facilities.
Despite the carnage—as well as the economic impact of war, which Iran swiftly responded to by effectively closing the Strait of Hormuz, a key oil shipping route, and sending oil prices skyrocketing—Booker on Sunday debuted what Just Foreign Policy executive director Erik Sperling called "Democrat neocon talking points" regarding reports of an impending peace deal.
The senator said reports of the deal—including the reopening of the strait, a lift of US sanctions allowing Iran to sell oil freely, and an apparent agreement to hold formal talks on Iran's nuclear program later—had him "outraged."
"The president said he went into this to deal with the nuclear program. This does not deal with that," said Booker, adding that the easing of sanctions of Iran would allow them to get "billions more" dollars.
"Giving Iran more money, as he has said, will allow them to do things like fuel their terrorist proxies," the senator added.
His comments were followed by Wasserman Schultz's interview on the same network Tuesday, when she said she was "concerned and frustrated over, again, another potential deal, a negotiation for a negotiation, where we're going to unfreeze Iranian assets" and allowing Iran to "rebuild their ballistic missile program."
Another Democrat comes out to the right of Trump, criticizing US-Iran negotiated deal to end the war:
"We're going to unfreeze Iranian assets and give them billions of dollars to be able to control proxies again?"
Rep. Wasserman-Schultz, former DNC chair https://t.co/D7plRDK0Nk pic.twitter.com/gq50DoaDqp
— Erik Sperling (@ErikSperling) May 26, 2026
Booker has taken more than $800,000 from pro-Israel groups including the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, while Wasserman Schultz has taken more than $1.4 million.
Murphy also condemned the reported deal on social media Sunday, saying that Trump "hasn’t accomplished ANY of his constantly shifting goals."
"Iran still has its ballistic missile and drone program," he said. "They still have a navy that can close the strait. A hardline regime is still in charge."
Jeet Heer of The Nation said that because the war on Iran "is immensely unpopular... prominent Democrats want to outflank Trump by being more hawkish."
Historian and analyst Stephen Wertheim credited Khanna with articulating "what the vast majority of Democrats believe, but too few of their leaders say and mean."
A March poll by Pew Research Center found that nearly 90% of Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents said the Trump administration had made the wrong decision going to war against Iran.
Khanna also spoke to Fox News over the weekend, saying he would support all efforts by Trump to negotiate a peace deal with Iran and expressing approval of the president's apparent rejection of the "Lindsay Graham wing of the party," referring to the South Carolina Republican, an outspoken advocate for military intervention in Iran and elsewhere.
Khanna's comments, said Sperling, represented "what decent, pro-diplomacy messaging looks like."