November, 22 2020, 11:00pm EDT

For Immediate Release
Contact:
Media contacts (general):
Bob Keener, (617) 610-6766, bobk@ips-dc.org
Chuck Collins, (617) 308-4433, chuck@ips-dc.org
Olivia Alperstein, (202) 704-9011, olivia@ips-dc.org
Media contact (workers):
Sara Myklebust, (520) 982-0387, Sara.Myklebust@georgetown.edu
United for Respect, press@united4respect.org
New Report Finds that a "Delinquent Dozen" Pandemic Profiteers Failed Essential Workers and Forced Them to Risk Their Health, While Still Profiting Immensely
Owners and CEOs of Retail Giants Studied Include Amazon, Target and Walmart
WASHINGTON
A new report finds that the pandemic has been a cash cow for billionaires while essential workers went underpaid, unsupported and forced to risk their health at corporations owned or operated by billionaires.
As the total wealth of America's billionaires rose by almost $1 trillion under the COVID-19 pandemic, the report, "Billionaire Wealth vs. Community Health," looked at a "Delinquent Dozen" companies that have vastly increased fortunes for their owners and CEOs but provided inadequate protection for their workers. This week retailers are expecting a surge in revenue due to their heavy promotion of Black Friday and Cyber Monday sales. The report was published by Institute for Policy Studies (IPS), United for Respect and Bargaining for the Common Good Network.
An analysis of billionaire wealth by IPS found that 647 U.S. billionaires gained $960 billion in wealth between March 18, 2020 and November 17, 2020. There are 33 new billionaires since mid-March.
The corporations scrutinized in the report include: Walmart, Amazon, Instacart, Tyson Foods, and Target. The report also studied private equity and investment firms, including Blackrock, Blackstone, KKR, Cerberus Capital, BC Partners and Leonard Green Partners.
Ten of the billionaire owners of seven of these Delinquent Dozen Companies have a combined wealth of $433 billion. Since March 18, 2020, their combined personal wealth has increased $127.5 billion, an increase of 42 percent. These ten billionaires are Jeff Bezos (Amazon), Alice, Rob and Jim Walton (Walmart), Apoorva Mehta (Instacart), John Tyson (Tyson Foods), Steve Schwarzman (Blackstone), Henry Kravis and George Roberts (KKR), and Steve Feinberg (Cerberus). The report authors portray these billionaires and their companies as emblematic of corporate greed that has grown rampant over the last 40 years.
Key findings of the report include:
The wealth of Amazon's Jeff Bezos has increased $70.7 billion since mid-March while an estimated 20,000 workers have been infected.
John H. Tyson, the billionaire owner of Tyson Foods, has seen his personal wealth increase over $635 million since the beginning of the pandemic as an estimated 11,000 Tyson workers have been infected.
Three owners of Walmart, Rob, Jim and Alice Walton, have seen their combined personal wealth increase over $48 billion since the beginning of the pandemic, about 30 percent increase. In 2018, Walmart's CEO Doug McMillion made 1,118 times the pay of Walmart's median worker. Yet Walmart refuses to provide hazard pay to its workers.
Instacart's profits have surged during the pandemic thanks to its essential workers on the frontlines of retail shopping for secluding customers. CEO founder Apoorva Mehta became an instant billionaire in June and is now worth $1.6 billion. He will see his wealth multiply when the company goes public in early 2021. Its current valuation is $30 billion, yet Instacart has over-hired 300,000 new workers and failed to provide sufficient protections.
Target CEO Brian Cornell is paid 821 times the median worker and his company has enjoyed a protected status as its competition was shut down during the pandemic as nonessential. The company enacted an already promised $2 increase in its starting wage but also cut the pay of its Target-owned Shipt delivery workers. Target could do more to protect its frontline employees.
The report also found that the owners of certain private equity firms have seen their fortunes surge. The report points out that private equity has moved into essential services such as health care, grocery provision and pet supply. And the report authors say that the business model of extreme cost cutting and debt loading in order to squeeze profits out of already profitable companies is fundamentally incompatible with the needs of protecting workers and communities during a pandemic. The report found that:
Leonard Green Partners acquired Prospect Medical Holdings, a major owner of hospitals. Investigations of Prospect Medical have found poor infection control and maintenance at its facilities. Workers at Prospect have been pressing for better infection protections, hazard pay, and safer working conditions. Over the last several years, Leonard Green saddled Prospect Medical with debt while paying dividends to shareholders and drawing scrutiny from Congress.
Private equity giant Blackstone owns TeamHealth, a company that early in the pandemic demoted a whistleblower doctor who went public about the company's lack of Covid-19 safety precautions and aggressive cost-cutting. Blackstone has saddled TeamHealth with debt and cost-cutting during the pandemic, resulting in a major downgrade of the company's bond rating. Blackstone founder and CEO Steve Schwartzman has seen his personal wealth increase $4.1 billion since the beginning of the pandemic.
Cerberus Capital owns a number of companies with frontline essential workers including Albertsons and Safeway supermarkets and the recently sold Steward Health Care. Steve Feinberg, the billionaire cofounder of the private equity firm has seen his personal wealth increase $276 million since the beginning of the pandemic. In June, Cerberus sold its primary stake in Steward Health to its doctors. But prior to the sale, they drew fire early in the pandemic by shutting down intensive care units in rural Massachusetts and failing to provide insufficient PPE equipment. Safeway markets had initial hazard pay that ended in June. Since then, Covid infections have increased 161 percent in Safeway stores.
The Dollar Stores, including Dollar General and Dollar Tree (owner of Family Dollar), have seen enormous profits during the pandemic. The investment services giant BlackRock has a large ownership stake in both companies. Dollar Tree CEO Gary Philbin is paid 690 times his median paid worker. Dollar General CEO Todd Vasos is paid 824 times their median paid worker. Understaffed stores and skimpy security pose one of many risks to workers during the pandemic, with an increase in assaults and even death when Dollar Store workers were attacked for asking a customer to wear a mask.
The two biggest pet supply retailers are both owned by private equity firms. PetSmart, owned by the UK-based BC Partners, and PetCo, owned by CVC Capital Partners, benefitted from the designations as essential businesses early in the pandemic, resulting in surging sales. That didn't stop PetSmart from furloughing and then permanently terminating workers across the U.S., causing them to lose health insurance and incomes. BC Capital leveraged PetSmart with debt, bought Chewy, and is now in the process of re-separating the companies to extract additional wealth. CVC Partners just announced it is looking to take PetCo public with a valuation of $6 billion, even with worker reports of serious health and safety issues.
Kenya Slaughter, an employee of Dollar General, owned in part by BlackRock, said, "I close the register many nights, so I know my store's revenue has practically doubled since the coronavirus hit. But we workers haven't gotten any extra money, even though we're risking our health, and our families' health, to keep the stores running."
"While Amazon's Jeff Bezos is on track to become the world's first trillionaire, the frontline workers like me who've built his fortune are treated like we're disposable," said Courtenay Brown, an Amazon Fresh warehouse worker in New Jersey and leader with United for Respect. "As the virus spikes, we get more and more orders, and Amazon expects us to work at inhumane rates. The pace is blistering and people get injured on the job a lot, people get sick, people are scared of catching COVID, and Amazon is not doing enough to protect our lives. It's time for Amazon's workers to get some actual compensation for the essential work we're doing -- we don't need feel-good TV commercials thanking us for being heroes, we need $5 an hour in hazard pay, paid sick leave, and workplace protections from this dangerous virus."
"Our communities are suffering. We've lost jobs, homes, loved ones and nearly 250,000 people in this country. This pandemic has underscored how our inequitable, racist system works," said Stephen Lerner, Senior Fellow, Kalmanovitz Initiative for Labor and the Working Poor, Georgetown University, and focused on Bargaining for the Common Good Network. "Essential workers keep going to work because they don't have any other choice. The executives of these companies, who are multi-millionaires and billionaires already, enrich themselves and their companies, profiting enormously while their workers suffer and die. It's time to protect workers and our communities and end a system that lets workers die while the billionaires get richer," he said.
"I have gone from making a reasonable income to questioning my ability to put food on the table, all while Instacart rolls out more and more public statements to fool consumers," said Shenaya Birkel, an Instacart employee. "While our economy is at risk due to quarantine, Instacart is cashing in more than ever. They had a huge opportunity to prove they care about the essential workers who do what their corporate employees would never do: shop in stores with COVID-19 floating around everywhere. Instead, they refused to offer hazard pay, over-hired, and actually decreased pay. It's time we get treated according to the risk we are facing every day," she said.
"These billionaire owners are like military generals sitting in protected bubbles sending their workers into the viral line of fire with insufficient shields," said Chuck Collins from the Institute for Policy Studies and co-author of the report along with an earlier IPS report, Billionaire Bonanza 2020. "It is sordid and unseemly for some to reap such rewards when millions risk their lives, their long-term health, and their livelihoods."
Charlene Haley, an employee of Safeway, which is owned by Cerberus Capital, said, "I go to work every day wondering if I am going to become infected, and my co-workers and I will continue to be at risk until a vaccine is widely available. We should receive hazard pay for as long as the hazard exists."
To address pandemic profiteering, the report proposes three sets of recommendations:1) for companies employing essential workers, 2) for lawmakers to protect essential workers, and 3) for lawmakers to reduce the concentration of wealth and power of billionaires and the corporations they own. Key recommendations include:
Corporations employing essential workers should:
Immediately implement hazard pay of at least $5 per hour
Provide substantial paid sick leave benefits for workers to stay home when ill, quarantine when exposed, and care for sick loved ones, as well as paid bereavement leave for those who have had family members die from COVID-19
Provide, regularly replace, and upgrade high quality personal protective equipment (PPE) at no cost to all their essential workers
Establish workplace health councils to enable workers to actively participate in monitoring workplace conditions
Public policies needed to protect essential workers:
Establish a Presidential Commission on Essential Workers with on-the-ground, diverse worker representation.
Pass Essential Workers' Bills of Rights developed in collaboration with workers' organizations at local, state and federal levels.
Legislate the creation of workplace health councils so workers can monitor and participate in the enforcement of compliance with health and safety regulations and guidance.
Policies needed to target the pandemic profiteering of millionaires, billionaires and exploitative businesses such as private equity firms, include:
Levy an Emergency Pandemic Wealth Tax on billionaires to raise $450 billion and fund protections for essential workers.
Establish a Pandemic Profiteering Oversight Committee that goes beyond oversight of stimulus funds.
Institute conditions on corporations receiving federal pandemic financial support, including the requirement to retain workers, preserve workers rights, and institute policies and procedures to protect workers from exposure to the virus.
Pass the Stop Wall Street Looting Act (SWSLA) including elimination of the "carried interest" loophole that enables private equity and hedge fund billionaires to pay lower tax rates.
IPS published additional recommendations to reduce extreme wealth and power in its April report, Billionaire Bonanza 2020: Wealth Windfalls, Tumbling Taxes and Pandemic Profiteers.
Institute for Policy Studies turns Ideas into Action for Peace, Justice and the Environment. We strengthen social movements with independent research, visionary thinking, and links to the grassroots, scholars and elected officials. I.F. Stone once called IPS "the think tank for the rest of us." Since 1963, we have empowered people to build healthy and democratic societies in communities, the US, and the world. Click here to learn more, or read the latest below.
LATEST NEWS
ICE's 'Frightening' Facial Recognition App is Scanning US Citizens Without Their Consent
"An ICE officer may ignore evidence of American citizenship—including a birth certificate—if the app says the person is an alien," said the ranking member of the House Homeland Security Committee.
Nov 01, 2025
Immigration agents are using facial recognition software as "definitive" evidence to determine immigration status and is collecting data from US citizens without their consent. In some cases, agents may detain US citizens, including ones who can provide their birth certificates, if the app says they are in the country illegally.
These are a few of the findings from a series of articles published this past week by 404 Media, which has obtained documents and video evidence showing that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents are using a smartphone app in the field during immigration stops, scanning the faces of people on the street to verify their citizenship.
The report found that agents frequently conduct stops that "seem to have little justification beyond the color of someone’s skin... then look up more information on that person, including their identity and potentially their immigration status."
While it is not clear what application the agencies are using, 404 previously reported that ICE is using an app called Mobile Fortify that allows ICE to simply point a camera at a person on the street. The photos are then compared with a bank of more than 200 million images and dozens of government databases to determine info about the person, including their name, date of birth, nationality, and information about their immigration status.
On Friday, 404 published an internal document from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) which stated that "ICE does not provide the opportunity for individuals to decline or consent to the collection and use of biometric data/photograph collection." The document also states that the image of any face that agents scan, including those of US citizens, will be stored for 15 years.
The outlet identified several videos that have been posted to social media of immigration officials using the technology.
In one, taken in Chicago, armed agents in sunglasses and face coverings are shown accosting a pair of Hispanic teenagers on bicycles, asking where they are from. The 16-year-old boy who filmed the encounter said he is "from here"—an American citizen—but that he only has a school ID on him. The officer tells the boy he'll be allowed to leave if he'll "do a facial." The other officer then snaps a photo of him with a phone camera and asks his name.
In another video, also in Chicago, agents are shown surrounding a driver, who declines to show his ID. Without asking, one officer points his phone at the man. "I’m an American citizen, so leave me alone,” the driver says. "Alright, we just got to verify that,” the officer responds.
Even if the people approached in these videos had produced identification proving their citizenship, there's no guarantee that agents would have accepted it, especially if the app gave them information to the contrary.
On Wednesday, ranking member of the House Homeland Security Committee, Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.), told 404 that ICE agents will even trust the app's results over a person's government documents.
“ICE officials have told us that an apparent biometric match by Mobile Fortify is a ‘definitive’ determination of a person’s status and that an ICE officer may ignore evidence of American citizenship—including a birth certificate—if the app says the person is an alien,” he said.
This is despite the fact that, as Nathan Freed Wessler, deputy director of the ACLU's Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project, told 404, “face recognition technology is notoriously unreliable, frequently generating false matches and resulting in a number of known wrongful arrests across the country."
Thompson said: "ICE using a mobile biometrics app in ways its developers at CBP never intended or tested is a frightening, repugnant, and unconstitutional attack on Americans’ rights and freedoms.”
According to an investigation published in October by ProPublica, more than 170 US citizens have been detained by immigration agents, often in squalid conditions, since President Donald Trump returned to office in January. In many of these cases, these individuals have been detained because agents wrongly claimed the documents proving their citizenship are false.
During a press conference this week, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem denied this reality, stating that "no American citizens have been arrested or detained" as part of Trump's "mass deportation" crusade.
"We focus on those who are here illegally," she said.
But as DHS's internal document explains, facial recognition software is necessary in the first place because "ICE agents do not know an individual's citizenship at the time of the initial encounter."
David Bier, the director of immigration studies at the Cato Institute, explains that the use of such technology suggests that ICE's operations are not "highly targeted raids," as it likes to portray, but instead "random fishing expeditions."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Despite Court Rulings, Trump Refuses to Pay Out Food Stamp Benefits to Tens of Millions
"The administration has chosen to hold food for more than forty million vulnerable people hostage to try to force Democrats to capitulate without negotiations," says one Georgetown law professor.
Nov 01, 2025
Two federal judges have said the Trump administration cannot use the government shutdown to suspend food assistance for 42 million Americans. But hours into Saturday, when payments were due to be disbursed, President Donald Trump appears to be defying the ruling, potentially leaving millions unable to afford this month's grocery bills.
A pair of federal judges in Massachusetts and Rhode Island ruled Friday that the Department of Agriculture's (USDA) freeze on benefits from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), also known as food stamps, was unlawful and that the department must use money from a contingency fund of $6 billion to pay for at least a portion of the roughly $8 billion meant to be disbursed this month.
“There is no doubt that the six billion dollars in contingency funds are appropriated funds that are without a doubt necessary to carry out the program’s operation,” said US District Judge McConnell of Rhode Island in his oral ruling. “The shutdown of the government through funding doesn’t do away with SNAP. It just does away with the funding of it. There could be no greater necessity than the prohibition across the board of funds for the program’s operations.”
McConnell added: “There is no doubt, and it is beyond argument, that irreparable harm will begin to occur if it hasn’t already occurred in the terror it has caused some people about the availability of funding for food for their family."
SNAP benefits are available to people whose monthly incomes fall below 130% of the federal poverty line. More than 1 in 8 Americans rely on the program, and 39% of them are children. According to USDA research, cited by the Washington Post, those who receive SNAP benefits rely on it for 63% of their groceries, with the poorest, who make below 50% of the poverty line, relying on it for as much as 80%.
McConnell shot down the administration's contention that the contingency funds may be needed for some other hypothetical emergency in the future, saying "It’s clear that when compared to the millions of people that will go without funds for food versus the agency’s desire not to use contingency funds in case there’s a hurricane need, the balances of those equities clearly goes on the side of ensuring that people are fed."
While the judge in Massachusetts, Indira Talwani, ruled that Trump merely had to use the contingency funds to fund as much of the program as possible, McConnell went further, saying that in addition, they had to tap other sources of funding to disburse benefits in full, and do so "as soon as possible." Both judges gave the administration until Monday to provide updates on how it planned to follow the ruling.
However, after the ruling on Friday, Trump insisted on social media that "government lawyers do not think we have the legal authority to pay SNAP with certain monies we have available, and now two courts have issued conflicting opinions on what we can and cannot do."
He added: "I do NOT want Americans to go hungry just because the Radical Democrats refuse to do the right thing and REOPEN THE GOVERNMENT. Therefore, I have instructed our lawyers to ask the Court to clarify how we can legally fund SNAP as soon as possible."
Attorney and activist Miles Mogulescu pointed out in Common Dreams that, "until a few days ago, even the Trump administration agreed that these funds should be used to continue SNAP funding during the shutdown."
On September 30, the day before the shutdown began, the USDA posted a 55-page "Lapse of Funding" plan to its website, which plainly stated that if the government were to shut down, "the department will continue operations related to... core nutrition safety net programs.”
But this week, USDA abruptly deleted the file and posted a new memo that concocted a new legal reality out of whole cloth, stating that “due to Congressional Democrats’ refusal to pass a clean continuing resolution (CR), approximately 42 million individuals will not receive SNAP benefits come November 1st.”
As Mogulescu notes: "The new memo cited absolutely no law supporting its position. Instead, it made up a rule claiming that the 'contingency fund is not available to support FY 2026 regular benefits, because the appropriation for regular benefits no longer exist.'"
Sharon Parrott, the president of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, who previously served as an official in the White House Office of Management, said last week that it's "unequivocally false" that the administration's hands are tied.
"I know from experience that the federal government has the authority and the tools it needs during a shutdown to get these SNAP funds to families," Parrott said. "Even at this late date, the professionals at the Department of Agriculture and in states can make this happen. And, to state the obvious, benefits that are a couple of days delayed are far more help to families than going without any help at all."
She added: "The administration itself admits these reserves are available for use. It could have, and should have, taken steps weeks ago to be ready to use these funds. Instead, it may choose not to use them in an effort to gain political advantage."
In hopes of pressuring Democrats to abandon their demands that Congress extend a critical Affordable Care Act tax credit and prevent health insurance premiums from skyrocketing for more than 20 million Americans, Republicans have sought to use the shutdown to inflict maximum pain on voters.
Trump has attempted to carry out mass layoffs of government workers, which have been halted by a federal judge. Meanwhile, his director of the Office of Management and Budget, Russell Vought, has stripped funding from energy and transportation infrastructure projects aimed at blue states and cities.
"Terminating SNAP is a choice, and an overtly unlawful one at that," says David Super, a constitutional law professor at Georgetown University. "The administration has chosen to hold food for more than forty million vulnerable people hostage to try to force Democrats to capitulate without negotiations.”
Keep ReadingShow Less
Judge Blocks Trump From Requiring Proof of Citizenship on Federal Voting Form
"Trump’s attempt to impose a documentary proof of citizenship requirement on the federal voter registration form is an unconstitutional power grab," said one plaintiff in the case.
Oct 31, 2025
A federal judge on Friday permanently blocked part of President Donald Trump's executive order requiring proof of US citizenship on federal voter registration forms, a ruling hailed by one plaintiff in the case as "a clear victory for our democracy."
Siding with Democratic and civil liberties groups that sued the administration over Trump's March edict mandating a US passport, REAL ID-compliant document, military identification, or similar proof in order to register to vote in federal elections, Senior US District Judge for the District of Columbia Colleen Kollar-Kotelly found the directive to be an unconstitutional violation of the separation of powers.
“Because our Constitution assigns responsibility for election regulation to the states and to Congress, this court holds that the president lacks the authority to direct such changes," Kollar-Kotelly, an appointee of former President Bill Clinton, wrote in her 81-page ruling.
"The Constitution addresses two types of power over federal elections: First, the power to determine who is qualified to vote, and second, the power to regulate federal election procedures," she continued. "In both spheres, the Constitution vests authority first in the states. In matters of election procedures, the Constitution assigns Congress the power to preempt State regulations."
"By contrast," Kollar-Kotelly added, "the Constitution assigns no direct role to the president in either domain."
This is the second time Kollar-Kotelly has ruled against Trump's proof-of-citizenship order. In April, she issued a temporary injunction blocking key portions of the directive.
"The president doesn't have the authority to change election procedures just because he wants to."
"The court upheld what we've long known: The president doesn't have the authority to change election procedures just because he wants to," the ACLU said on social media.
Sophia Lin Lakin of the ACLU, a plaintiff in the case, welcomed the decision as “a clear victory for our democracy."
"President Trump’s attempt to impose a documentary proof of citizenship requirement on the federal voter registration form is an unconstitutional power grab," she added.
Campaign Legal Center president Trevor Potter said in a statement: "This federal court ruling reaffirms that no president has the authority to control our election systems and processes. The Constitution gives the states and Congress—not the president—the responsibility and authority to regulate our elections."
"We are glad that this core principle of separation of powers has been upheld and celebrate this decision, which will ensure that the president cannot singlehandedly impose barriers on voter registration that would prevent millions of Americans from making their voices heard in our elections," Potter added.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


