November, 22 2020, 11:00pm EDT

Report: Fossil Fuel Industry Received Up To $15 Billion in COVID-19 Direct Relief
Industry Also Received Nearly $95 Billion in Indirect Support Through Federal Bond-Buying Programs and Private Bond Sales, Bringing Benefit Tally to $110 Billion
WASHINGTON
The fossil fuel industry has received up to $15.2 billion in direct federal relief through federal COVID-19 recovery programs since bailouts began in March 2020, a new report by BailoutWatch, Public Citizen and Friends of the Earth has found.
The report tallies the amount of money that has flowed to fossil fuel companies and related services since the beginning of the pandemic response.
All told, $110 billion in direct and indirect benefits, with half of the quantifiable direct and indirect benefits going to just 66 companies, including nearly $95 billion in indirect benefits.
Key findings:
- In its response to the pandemic since March 26th, the U.S. government provided between $10.4 billion and $15.2 billion in direct benefits to coal, oil, and gas companies, including:
- At least $5.5 billion via CARES Act tax law changes to 70 money-losing dirty energy companies, a number likely to grow;
- $582 million in direct, subsidized loans through the Federal Reserve's Main Street Lending Program to 37 mid-sized fossil fuel and related companies; the program caters to them by design;
- $4.3 to $9.1 billion in forgivable loans to at least 25,931 companies through the Small Business Administration's Paycheck Protection Program; and
- At least 229 oil and gas companies enjoyed waivers of fees normally paid to drill on public land, giveaways that cost the government a minimum of $4.5 million in lost revenue, likely far more.
- Five major fossil fuel companies received more than 10% of the $110 billion in direct benefits like tax refunds and indirect support in the form of bond issuances, even as their finances continued a years-long decline.
- More than 60 others double- or triple-dipped into government programs, collecting tax refunds and subsidized or forgivable loans while paying less money to drill on public lands thanks to pandemic-related giveaways.
- The Fed indirectly purchased $432.1 million in already-issued fossil fuel bonds through its Secondary Market Corporate Credit Facility.
- Investors responded by lending $93.5 billion to the struggling fossil fuel industry in newly-issued bonds in the months after the Fed stepped in.
To determine the scope of bailout benefits, the report research team calculated the direct benefits paid out through programs established under the CARES Act - the Paycheck Protection Program, the Main Street Lending Program, and tax-law changes benefiting the industry - and other industry-friendly policies, like fee reductions for drilling on public land.
The Fed's purchases of fossil fuel bonds from investors meanwhile, generated nearly $100 billion in indirect benefits as private investors, reassured by the Fed's actions, were suddenly more willing to buy fossil fuel bonds.
"When the pandemic hit last spring, Trump's corporate cronies made sure the fossil fuel industry was able to squeeze whatever favors they could out of the resulting economic rescues," said Alan Zibel, research director of Public Citizen's Corporate Presidency Project and a co-author of the report. "The Biden administration and the next Congress will have a golden opportunity to ensure our efforts to rescue the economy no longer benefit the very companies most responsible for the devastation caused by climate change."
"The fossil fuel industry took advantage of the pandemic to put their hands out for help escaping a financial mess of their own making, and their allies in the federal government rode to the rescue," said Christopher Kuveke, BailoutWatch analyst and a co-author of the report. "By artificially delaying the industry's inevitable decline at taxpayers' expense, the government has made it that much harder to make the necessary transition to clean energy sources."
"The Trump Administration has wasted billions of dollars keeping the fossil fuel industry alive," said Lukas Ross, Program Manager at Friends of the Earth. "President-elect Biden must ensure that people, not polluters, benefit from COVID relief. It's time to cut dirty energy's lifeline."
Read the full report here.
Public Citizen is a nonprofit consumer advocacy organization that champions the public interest in the halls of power. We defend democracy, resist corporate power and work to ensure that government works for the people - not for big corporations. Founded in 1971, we now have 500,000 members and supporters throughout the country.
(202) 588-1000LATEST NEWS
Janeese Lewis George, Next DC Mayor, Says Working People 'Don't Want to Hear What Government Can't Do'
"This is not a liberal, moderate, or socialist thing," said the democratic socialist after winning the Democratic Party primary in the nation's capital. "We all want to be able to achieve the American Dream."
Jun 19, 2026
Janeese Lewis George, a Washington, DC City Councilmember, won the Democratic primary to become the city's next mayor on Thursday, a triumph celebrated by progressives in the nation's capital and beyond as a further sign that the democratic socialism she represents is resonating deeply with voters within the party.
“From native Washingtonians to people that have found and called this place home, to restaurant workers, to teachers, to retirees, so many people—whether you’re new to the team or have been a part of this since day one, I want to be clear that I plan to be a mayor for everyone who calls this city home,” Lewis George said at a press conference after the primary was called in her favor.
In the deeply blue city, winner of the Democratic primary means Lewis George is almost certain to be the next mayor, the latest in a string of self-identified democratic socialists to win elections in major US cities this cycle, including Mayor Zohran Mamdani in New York City and Seattle Mayor Katie Wilson.
As the Washington Post notes in its coverage of Lewis George's win,
Faith in capitalism is slipping, and socialism does not carry the same toxic brand among young voters that it does with older Americans who grew up during the Cold War. An August 2025 Gallup poll found that 49 percent of Americans ages 18 to 34 had positive views of socialism, compared with 30 percent of Americans 55 and older. The survey found that Americans on balance prefer capitalism to socialism, but the favorability of capitalism dropped from 60 percent in 2021 to 54 percent.
During remarks to the press on Thursday, Lewis George downplayed the usefulness of political or ideological labels, but said what voters are craving is elected officials willing to address their material needs and to fight to make the day-to-day lives of working people more affordable.
NOW - Lewis George: "People don't want to hear about what government can't do" pic.twitter.com/6pnWtbc0a6
— Joey Barke (@joey_barke) June 18, 2026
"This is not a liberal, moderate, or socialist thing," she said. "We all want to be able to achieve the American Dream. We all want to be able to provide for our families and ourselves. And that's what leaders should be focused on—delivering results for residents in this city and in this country."
"People are not interested in hearing what government can't do," Lewis George continued. "When they're struggling every day, working two jobs, and still can't make it—they don't want to hear what government can't do."
Ashik Siddique, co-chair of the city's chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), suggested to the Post that Lewis George, who DSA backed in the primary, represents more of what voters are craving after decades of Democrats tracking further to the right and capitulating to corporate interests—even in the face of President Donald Trump.
“People are feeling like they have to work way harder to get by, and meanwhile they’re seeing Elon Musk become the first trillionaire in the world,” said Siddique. “The Trump administration is just administering policies that make people’s lives worse, and many people feel like the Democratic Party establishment is not really putting up a fight.”
Keep ReadingShow Less
Failing 'Moral Test,' Newsom Rejects Compromise 2% Wealth Tax on California Billionaires
"I want a Democratic party that will stand for the working class," said Rep. Ro Khanna, a supporter of taxing billionaire wealth. "Whose side are you on?"
Jun 19, 2026
California Gov. Gavin Newsom on Thursday refused to budge from his opposition to a proposed wealth tax on the Golden State's billionaires, swiftly dismissing a union-led coalition's effort to compromise by reducing its desired 5% rate by more than half.
In a letter to Newsom on Thursday, the Billionaire Tax Now coalition urged the governor and likely 2028 presidential candidate to support a "2% wealth tax on the state’s richest 200 billionaires." The coalition's demand came hours after organizers announced that they had collected enough signatures to get their proposed one-time, 5% tax on billionaire wealth on California's ballot in November.
Newsom's office made clear that the governor, who has been outspoken in his opposition to the proposed 5% wealth tax, would not support the compromise offer.
"The governor has been clear that he is strongly opposed to a California-only wealth tax," Tara Gallegos, a spokesperson for Newsom, said in a statement. "Changing the tax rate doesn’t change this measure’s fundamental flaws that harm working Californians.”
The Billionaire Tax Now coalition on Thursday offered to withdraw its popular ballot initiative calling for a one-time 5% levy on California billionaires' wealth if Newsom agreed to throw his weight behind legislation enacting a 2% wealth tax instead. Organizers and supporters say a tax on the vast fortunes of the state's wealthiest residents would help avert a looming healthcare disaster spurred by federal Medicaid cuts that President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans passed last summer.
"California is home to more billionaires than any state in the nation," the coalition wrote in its letter to Newsom on Thursday. "Their wealth has grown a staggering 212% in the last six years alone to more than $2.2 trillion dollars. A 2% one-time tax on that accumulated wealth is modest by any objective measure, especially if it means keeping emergency rooms open and saving patient lives. It’s more than appropriate at a moment when every other Californian is being asked by Sacramento to sacrifice."
"We need you to stand up against one of Trump’s worst and deadliest domestic policy blunders yet—the cuts to California healthcare contained in the 'One Big Beautiful Bill,'" the coalition added. "Let’s save patient lives together."
US Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), a Silicon Valley representative who has supported the proposed wealth tax in the face of angry billionaire backlash, expressed support for the 2% compromise offer in a social media post on Thursday, noting that "250 billionaires own half of California GDP."
"Taxing them at 2% would save healthcare for millions. Healthcare workers have already compromised from 5%," Khanna wrote. "I want a Democratic party that will stand for the working class. This is a moral test for our party. Whose side are you on?"
Keep ReadingShow Less
US-Iran Talks Delayed as 'Renewed Israeli Aggression' in Lebanon Kills at Least 18
One Lebanese writer reported that Israeli forces were "committing massacres" in residential areas across southern Lebanon, threatening to derail progress toward a US-Iran peace deal.
Jun 19, 2026
US and Iranian delegations delayed plans to travel to Switzerland on Friday for the opening round of talks to cement the details of a peace agreement as the Israeli military bombarded southern Lebanon, killing at least 18 people and threatening once again to derail momentum toward a diplomatic resolution.
The Associated Press reported that "mediators worked to reschedule the meetings crucial for starting talks over a permanent end to the Iran war, with much of the attention focused on Lebanon." Iran's leadership has insisted that ending Israeli attacks on Lebanon is critical to ending the war, and the memorandum of understanding signed earlier this week calls for "the immediate and permanent termination of military operations on all fronts, including in Lebanon."
Israel's military, which joined the US in launching the war on Iran in late February, carried out strikes throughout southern Lebanon on Friday, hours after US Vice President JD Vance—who was supposed to travel to Switzerland—publicly complained about the Israeli leadership's tendency to launch bombing campaigns during critical stages of the Trump administration's talks with Iran. Last weekend, Israeli forces bombed Beirut shortly after US President Donald Trump announced plans to sign the memorandum of understanding.
"We seem to be right on the cusp of a major breakthrough in the agreement, and then all of a sudden, there's a major explosion that goes off in a civilian population center in Beirut, and a lot of people who have nothing to do with Hezbollah lose their lives," Vance told reporters on Thursday. "That's not acceptable."
JD Vance criticizes Israel:
We seem to be right on the cusp of a major breakthrough in the agreement, and then all of a sudden there's a major explosion that goes off in a civilian population center in Beirut, and a lot of people who have nothing to do with Hezbollah lose their… pic.twitter.com/Roi6BVtpnt
— Clash Report (@clashreport) June 18, 2026
Roqayah Chamseddine, a southern Lebanese writer, reported that "the intense Israeli bombardment" on Friday "targeted populated residential neighborhoods in the Nabatieh district, committing massacres in the towns of Dweir Harouf, Al-Sharqiya, and Kfar Sir, while also striking Kfar Roumman, Haboush, Jebchit, Toul, and Deir al-Zahrani."
"People had only just begun returning to their villages," Chamseddine wrote. "The renewed Israeli aggression quickly expanded into the Western Bekaa Valley, where Israeli warplanes targeted the heights of Abu Rashed and launched attacks along the Litani River valley near the town of Zalaya."
Apocalyptic scenes in Harouf, South Lebanon.
Israel dropped bombs on residential buildings in the middle of the night.
Entire families are now buried under the rubble. pic.twitter.com/kuKVB0ffjQ
— sarah (@sahouraxo) June 19, 2026
Four Israeli soldiers were killed in southern Lebanon on Friday by a Hezbollah attack on an Israeli tank, according to the Israel Defense Forces. The attack prompted Israel's far-right national security minister, Itamar Ben-Gvir, to declare that "all of Lebanon must burn."
"With all due respect to the Americans, Israel must make it clear to the entire world that the blood of our sons and the security of our citizens are not forfeited," Ben-Gvir added.
The Trump White House cited logistical challenges in a statement announcing the delay of the US delegation's departure to Switzerland, not mentioning Lebanon.
But the Lebanese outlet Al Mayadeen reported that the Israeli assault on Lebanon was central to the Iranian delegation's decision to postpone its planned trip on Friday.
"The delegation had already been preparing to depart Iran and launch the first round of negotiations, scheduled to span 60 days, before the decision to suspend the trip was made," Al Mayadeen reported, citing an unnamed source. "Tehran had previously informed both Washington and the mediators that the Lebanon file remains a central component of the negotiations and will directly influence whether the talks proceed."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


