

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Today across the nation activists in 60 cities and 25 states will utilize Covid-safe and creative ways to deliver letters calling on major banks to distance themselves from the funding of the toxic Keystone XL and Enbridge's Line3 tar sands pipelines as part of the day of action organized by the Stop the Money Pipeline (STMP), a coalition of now over 140 groups committed to ending the financial sector's support and funding of fossil fuel projects as a key pathway towards decarbonization.
Amid an intense spike in Covid related deaths and infections and stay home orders, the activists plan a "Covid-safe" Day of Action where hundreds of individuals in 60 cities and 25 states have agreed to deliver letters to local bank branches and insurance offices of the major funders and insurers of fossil-fuel investments calling on them to "NOT FUND or INSURE" the last two tar-sands pipelines - the toxic and disruptive Keystone XL, and Enbridge Line3 projects.
"You would have thought that Wall Street would have learned their lesson," said Alec Connon, Stop the Money Pipeline Coalition Co-Coordinator. "In 2016, the resistance to the Dakota Access pipeline hit the financial sector hard. Protests were held at bank branches throughout the country. Thousands of people pulled their money out of Wall Street banks. City governments stopped banking with the funders of the pipeline. Yet once again Wall Street is complicit in funding an oil pipeline that violates Indigenous treaty rights and damages our climate. They can expect the backlash to be every bit as fierce as it was at Standing Rock."
In Seattle, activists will be participating in a car caravan, attaching large #DefundLine3 banners to trucks and cars, and taking the car caravan to Chase branches across the city. They will occupy the street outside of both Chase and Liberty Mutual's regional HQ, as activists go inside to deliver the letters in a COVID-safe fashion. In Portland, organizers will be taking a decommissioned fire truck to downtown Chase branches to demand that Chase helps put out the fires of the climate crisis.
Actions are planned in New York City, Washington DC, San Francisco, Denver, Boston, Chicago, Cincinnati, Madison, Minneapolis, and Charlotte. In Boston, Climate Finance Action will make deliveries to Liberty Mutual and BlackRock offices. In the Bay Area, activists will visit at least twenty bank branches in cities across the region. In Washington, DC activists with Shutdown DC will be delivering the letter to a branch of Chase Bank, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citibank with banker CEO puppets, signs, banners, and chants while socially distanced. In Colorado, activists in Denver, Boulder, and Colorado Springs will be participating along with others in 25 states to carry out COVID safe letter deliveries at local bank branches such as Chase, Citi, and Bank of America or Liberty Mutual insurance offices as well.
This is a particularly crucial time for activists seeking to push the financial sector away from financing the Climate Emergency. Many are looking at building momentum leading up to the March 31, 2021, credit renewal date for a $2.1B credit facility renewal date for Enbridge. Eighteen banks are on the loan as lenders including the US banks Chase, Citi, and BOA. KXL is also entering a key period, and TC Energy is currently trying to secure a $4.5 billion loan for the project before year-end from some of the same banks.
"These financial institutions continue to be the drivers of the climate crisis. They continue to finance, and profit from, fossil fuel projects such as Line 3, TransMountain, and the Keystone XL pipelines that knowingly violate the treaty rights of Tribal Nations. Our Tribal communities continue to push back against and resist these earth-destroying projects," said Matt Remle (Lakota), co-founder of Mazaksa Talks. "People need to pick a side, stand with those protecting the air, water, lands, and health of communities for all peoples, or with those profiting from the destruction of the air, water, lands and health of our communities. It's that simple."
For many, the tar sands type of pipeline is extremely problematic due to the toxic impact on the environment, clean water, and rivers. These destructive impacts are only worse during a pandemic. The Enbridge Line3 project in Minnesota, if it goes through, could bring thousands of workers into tribal lands contributing to the spread of Covid. Additionally, worker camps also have been proven to contribute to sexual violence and trafficking against Indigenous women. If built, Line 3 would release as much greenhouse gas pollution as fifty new coal-fired power plants and would violate Ojibwe treaty rights, and put the state's water, ecosystems, and communities at risk
Many activists and indigenous communities are fighting against time and see this as the last line in the sand designed to hold off polluters until the incoming presidential administration of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris step in and forcibly move away from these represent anachronistic and dangerous policies as a nation committed to taking on the climate crisis with new vigor.
"This pipeline isn't about the so-called "safe" transportation of a necessary product it's the final gasp of a dying industry desperately trying to perpetuate fossil fuel use in a society that knows its past time to make better choices for energy use, " said Amy Gray, Stop the Money Pipeline Coalition Co-Coordinator. "All tar-sands pipelines leak and they wreak havoc from the extraction at the tar sands through the route of the pipeline all the way to the communities who live in the shadow of the refineries. It's time for Wall Street to stop funding these dangerous pipelines and respect Indigenous sovereignty, frontline communities and re-invest in a just and equitable transition to renewable energy."
The coalition plans to deliver the STMP cover letter, as well as the Indigenous Women's Tar Sands letter- sent last month to the CEOs of 70 major financial companies and insurers calling for them to respect their tribal rights and to end all ties to tar sands pipelines. 158 organizations, which collectively claim millions of supporters, have already signed on to the letter's demands to stop Line 3, Keystone XL, and all other toxic tar sands expansion projects.
QUOTE SHEET FOR DECEMBER 11th DAY OF ACTION
SELECT QUOTES FROM PARTNERS
"Line 3, Keystone XL, and all tar sands extraction and pipelines must be stopped immediately and financial institutions much be held accountable for their role in financing these projects and perpetuating further Indigenous rights violations, destruction of the climate, escalating harms to public health during a pandemic, and increased rates of violence toward Indigenous women living near 'man camps' associated with pipeline construction. As multiple crises in 2020 proliferate, business as usual must not and cannot continue. We must heed the call of Indigenous women leaders," said Osprey Orielle Lake, Executive Director of the Women's Earth and Climate Action Network (WECAN) International.
"Line 3 and Keystone XL are fossil-fueled disasters. These pipelines violate Indigenous rights and would wreck the climate -- our analysis shows constructing both would be the equivalent of building hundreds of new coal plants. Supporting projects like Line 3 and Keystone XL in 2020 is unconscionable, and we're taking action to show financial institutions that the movement for climate justice won't let them get away with it any longer," said Collin Rees, Senior Campaigner at Oil Change International.
"Here in DC, we are committed to fighting to #Stopline3 and demand #NoKXL. We came out today to put Chase, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citibank on notice that they better not fund the two remaining pipelines of the toxic tar sands project," said Liz Butler, organizer with Shut Down DC.
"This project is an insult to people in younger generations like mine who will be forced to live with the disastrous consequences of climate chaos and trashed wetlands here in Minnesota. Even worse, it is an assault on the fundamental rights of Indigenous communities and an intolerable continuation of settler colonialism." - Sasha Lewis-Norelle, Sunrise St. Paul, age 21
"Toward righting the ongoing wrongs of our European ancestors," said Cheryl Barnds, co-chair of Rapid Shift Network, "we deliver these letters in solidarity with the 41 Indigenous Women who have patiently asked CEOs of major global asset managers, banks, and insurers: With fossil fuel corporations plowing ahead with pipeline construction in the midst of a global pandemic and massive financial meltdown, we urge your institutions to immediately decline any support for TC Energy's Keystone XL pipeline, Enbridge's Line 3 pipeline, and the Canadian government's Trans Mountain pipeline - and to cut ties with these tar sands projects and companies."
As oil stocks plummeted this year, wildfires raged and clean water became more scarce than ever; somehow banks like Chase, Wells Fargo, Bank of America, and others still think it's ok to invest in fossil fuel infrastructure like Enbridge's Line 3 and KXL. There is no logic, aside from greed. Indigenous rights abuses continue to be perpetuated by the industry, and climate chaos is not a thing of the future any more, it is NOW. We are in the final hour to save our planet from hundreds of years of runaway climate change. Big banks must stop funding fossil fuel infrastructure immediately,"-said Kellie Berns, Program Director, Earth Guardians.
"We must end all tar sands extraction and pipeline projects immediately! Line 3 and KXL are violating Indigenous rights and pose devastating health risks to the Indigenous communities surrounding these sites, as well as to our planet overall. It's unconscionable that these projects were even considered, let alone moving forward in the middle of a pandemic. We took action today to expose the financial institutions bankrolling these projects like Chase, Bank of America, and Wells Fargo to demand that they respect tribal rights and immediately end all ties to tar sands pipelines. Listen to Indigenous women leaders!" - Erika This Patterson, Campaign Director, Action Center on Race and the Economy
The Stop the Money Pipeline coalition is over 160 organizations strong holding the financial backers of climate chaos accountable.
"Trump, Putin, and Xi can and must put the world on a safer path by taking commonsense actions to build down the nuclear danger," said one campaigner.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Wednesday implicitly confirmed that New START—a key arms control treaty between the United States and Russia—will expire Thursday, prompting renewed demands for what one group called "a more coherent approach from the Trump administration" toward nuclear nonproliferation.
Asked about the impending expiration of New START during a Wednesday press conference, Rubio said he didn't "have any announcement" on the matter, and that President Donald Trump "will opine on it later."
"Obviously, the president’s been clear in the past that in order to have true arms control in the 21st century, it’s impossible to do something that doesn’t include China because of their vast and rapidly growing stockpile," Rubio said.
🇺🇸🇷🇺🇨🇳 Secretary of State Marco Rubio:
I don't have any announcement on New START right now. I think the President will opine on it later.
The President has been clear in the past that in order to have true arms control in the 21st century, it's impossible to do something that… pic.twitter.com/8pxi3bfdsy
— Visioner (@visionergeo) February 4, 2026
New START, signed in 2010, committed the United States and Russia to halving the number of strategic nuclear missile launchers in their arsenals. While the treaty did not limit the size of the countries' actual nuclear arsenals, proponents pointed to its robust verification regime and other transparency features as mutually beneficial highlights of the agreement.
“We have known that New START would end for 15 years, but no one has shown the necessary leadership to be prepared for its expiration,” said John Erath, senior policy director at the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation and former longtime State Department official.
“The treaty limited the number of nuclear weapons the United States and Russia could have, but perhaps more importantly, New START also provided each country with unprecedented insights into the other’s arsenal so that Washington and Moscow could make decisions based on real information rather than speculation," Erath added.
The last remaining major treaty limiting the world's two largest nuclear arsenals expires Feb. 5. Does this mean the end of nuclear arms control? Not necessarily. Read our statement.armscontrolcenter.org/statement-on...
[image or embed]
— Nukes of Hazard (@nukesofhazard.bsky.social) February 4, 2026 at 2:04 PM
Daryl G. Kimball, executive director of the Arms Control Association, said Wednesday that "the end of New START requires a more coherent approach from the Trump administration."
"If President Trump and Secretary Rubio are serious, they should make a serious proposal for bilateral (not trilateral) talks with Beijing," he asserted. "Despite Trump’s talk about involving China in nuclear negotiations, there is no indication that Trump or his team have taken the time to propose risk reduction or arms control talks with China since returning to office in 2025."
Kimball continued:
Furthermore, there is no reason why the United States and Russia should not and cannot continue, as [Russian President Vladimir] Putin suggested on September 22, to respect the central limits of New START and begin the hard work of negotiating a new framework agreement involving verifiable limits on strategic, intermediate-range, and short-range nuclear weapons, as well as strategic missile defenses.
At the same time, if he is serious about involving China in “denuclearization” talks, he could and should invite [Chinese President Xi Jinping] when they meet later this year, to agree to regular bilateral talks on risk reduction and arms control involving senior Chinese and US officials.
"With the end of New START, Trump, Putin, and Xi can and must put the world on a safer path by taking commonsense actions to build down the nuclear danger," Kimball added.
Erath lamented that "with New START’s expiration, we have not only lost unprecedented verification measures that our military and decision-makers depended on, but we have ended more than five decades of painstaking diplomacy that successfully avoided nuclear catastrophe."
"Agreements preceding New START helped reduce the global nuclear arsenal by more than 80% since the height of the Cold War,"
he noted. "Now, both Russia and the United States have no legal obstacle to building their arsenals back up, and we could find ourselves reliving the Cold War."
Last week, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists’ Science and Security Board advanced its symbolic Doomsday Clock to 85 seconds to midnight, the closest it has ever been to global thermonuclear annihilation, citing developments including failure to extend New START, China's growing arsenal, and Russian weapons tests—to which Trump has vowed to respond in kind.
"The good news is," said Erath, is that "the end of New START does not have to mean the end of nuclear arms control."
"While New START can’t be extended beyond today, Presidents Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin could decide to respect the numerical limits the treaty set on nuclear arsenals," he explained. "They could also resume the treaty’s data exchanges and on-site inspections, in addition to implementing verification measures from other previous arms control treaties."
"Further, they could instruct their administrations to begin immediate talks on a new treaty to cover existing and novel systems and potentially bring in other nuclear powers, like China," Erath continued. "Meanwhile, Congress could—and should—fund nonproliferation and global monitoring efforts while refusing to fund dangerous new nuclear weapons systems."
Last December, US Sens. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) and Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) and Reps. Don Beyer (D-Va.), John Garamendi (D-Calif.), and Jim McGovern (D-Mass.) reintroduced the bicameral Hastening Arms Limitation Talks (HALT) Act, "legislation outlining a vision for a 21st century freeze on the testing, production, and deployment of nuclear weapons."
"The Doomsday Clock is at 85 seconds to midnight," Markey—who co-chairs the congressional Nuclear Weapons and Arms Control Working Group—said Wednesday ahead of a press conference with HALT Act co-sponsors. "We need to replace New START now."
"Every single ICE and CBP agent should be out of Minnesota," the congresswoman said. "The terror campaign must stop."
President Donald Trump's "border czar," Tom Homan, announced Wednesday that 700 immigration agents are leaving Minnesota, but with around 2,000 expected to remain there, Democratic Congresswoman Ilhan Omar, whose district includes Minneapolis, declared that the drawdown is "not enough."
As part of Trump's "Operation Metro Surge," agents with Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) have invaded multiple Minnesota cities, including Minneapolis and Saint Paul, and committed various acts of violence, such as fatally shooting Alex Pretti and Renee Good.
In a pair of social media posts about Homan's announcement, Omar argued that "every single ICE and CBP agent should be out of Minnesota. The terror campaign must stop."
"This occupation has to end!" she added, also renewing her call to abolish ICE—a position adopted by growing shares of federal lawmakers and the public as Trump's mass deportation agenda has hit Minnesota's Twin Cities, the Chicago and Los Angeles metropolitan areas, multiple cities in Maine, and other communities across the United States.
In Congress, where a fight over funding for CBP and ICE's parent agency, the Department of Homeland Security, is playing out, Omar has stood with other progressives in recent votes. The bill signed by Trump on Tuesday only funds DHS through the middle of the month, though Republicans gave ICE an extra $75 billion in last year's budget package.
During an on-camera interview with NBC News' Tom Llamas, Trump said that the reduction of agents came from him. After the president's factually dubious rant about crime rates, Llamas asked what he had learned from the operation in Minnesota. Trump responded: "I learned that maybe we can use a little bit of a softer touch. But you still have to be tough."
"We're really dealing with really hard criminals," Trump added. Despite claims from him and others in the administration that recent operations have targeted "the worst of the worst," data have repeatedly shown that most immigrants detained by federal officials over the past year don't have any criminal convictions.
Operation Metro Surge has been met with persistent protests in Minnesota and solidarity actions across the United States. Jaylani Hussein, executive director of the Minnesota chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, said Wednesday that "the limited drawdown of ICE agents from Minnesota is not a concession. It is a direct response to Minnesotans standing up to unconstitutional federal overreach."
"Minnesotans are winning against this attack on all our communities by organizing, resisting, and defending our constitutional rights. But this moment should not be a victory lap," Hussein continued. "It must instead be a call to continue pushing for justice. The deaths of Renee Good and Alex Pretti at the hands of federal immigration agents remain uninvestigated, and communities and prosecutors alike have raised grave concerns about violations of their oaths and the Constitution. This is not the time to pull back, it is the time to deepen our resilience, increase our support for one another, and keep fighting for our democracy and accountability until justice is served."
The Not Above the Law coalition's co-chairs—Praveen Fernandes of the Constitutional Accountability Center, Kelsey Herbert of MoveOn, Lisa Gilbert of Public Citizen, and Brett Edkins, of Stand Up America—similarly said that "Tom Homan's announcement that 700 federal immigration agents will be withdrawn from Minnesota is more a minor concession than a meaningful policy shift."
"The vast majority—approximately 2,000 federal agents—remain deployed in the state, and enforcement operations continue unabated," the co-chairs stressed. "This token gesture does nothing to address the ongoing terror families face or the constitutional crisis this administration's actions have created."
“The killings of Minnesotans demand real accountability," they added. "Families torn apart by raids and alleged constitutional violations deserve justice. Real change means the complete withdrawal of all federal forces conducting these operations in Minnesota, full accountability for the deaths and violations that have occurred, and congressional action to restore the rule of law. The American people deserve better than political theater when constitutional rights hang in the balance."
On Tuesday, the state and national ACLU asked the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination to "use its early warning and urgent action procedure in response to the human rights crisis following the Trump administration's deployment of federal forces" in the Twin Cities.
"The Trump administration's ongoing immigration enforcement operations in Minnesota are being carried out by thousands of masked federal agents in military gear who are ignoring basic constitutional and human rights of Minnesotans," said Teresa Nelson, legal director of the ACLU of Minnesota. "Their targeting of our Somali and Latino communities threatens Minnesotans’ most fundamental rights, and it has spread fear among immigrant communities and neighborhoods."
"When Big Pharma gets richer off the back of a grandmother struggling to pay for cancer medication, the system is broken."
Led by Senate Finance Committee Chair Ron Wyden, four Democratic senators on Wednesday outlined plans to reduce the costs of prescription drugs after President Donald Trump claimed he would do so—only to allow Big Pharma companies to delay negotiating lower prices and secure "zero commitments" from top executives on making lifesaving medications more affordable for millions of Americans.
“There is no greater fraud than Donald J. Trump when it comes to lower drug prices,” Wyden (D-Ore.) said. “Our doors are wide open to anybody who wants to take the bold next step forward on lowering drug costs for Americans."
Along with a "flash report" on Trump's "broken promises" regarding his pledge to bring drug prices down “to levels nobody ever thought was possible," Wyden sent a Dear Colleague letter to Democratic senators regarding his committee's plans to follow through with lowering costs.
"Finance Committee minority staff will dedicate substantial time and effort this year to developing the next generation of healthcare solutions that lower costs for American families," Wyden wrote. "These solutions will rein in Big Pharma’s outrageous price increases, lower costs for consumers, guarantee predictability for patients, and reduce wasteful government spending that pads the profits of big corporations. Alongside the co-signers of this letter, I invite you to be a part of this bold vision."
The letter, co-signed by Sens. Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.), Peter Welch (D-Vt.), and Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.), notes that "the only concrete drug pricing policy Trump enacted within the past year was a price hike for the biggest blockbuster cancer drugs on Earth, giving an $8.8 billion windfall to the pharmaceutical industry."
In contrast, the senators wrote, the Senate Finance Committee will develop policies to incorporate international pricing models into the Medicare drug price negotiation framework, including by allowing Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to consider international prices as a factor or penalize drugmakers when pricing for US customers exceeds international benchmarks.
“Democrats are determined to bring prices down, and we’re willing to work with anyone to find concrete ways to do it."
The committee will also work to end Republican "blockbuster drug bailouts from negotiation," like the ones included in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act that shielded several high-priced drugs—including the cancer drug Keytruda—from Medicare price negotiations.
"The Republican budget bill contained a nearly $9 billion sweetheart deal that benefits the biggest drug companies by delaying or exempting some lifesaving medications from negotiation," reads the Democrats' flash report.
Gallego said that "when Big Pharma gets richer off the back of a grandmother struggling to pay for cancer medication, the system is broken."
"That’s what this is all about: Big Pharma execs sitting in their fancy corner offices profiting off of sick, working-class Americans,” the senator said. “We are not going to accept an America where millions of families live in fear of getting sick and needing to fill a prescription. We are going to fight and fight hard for a healthcare system that does what Donald Trump never did: actually lower costs for working families.”
The lawmakers emphasized that even if manufacturers are forced to lower drug prices, patients are not currently guaranteed to directly benefit, because as much as 45% of the $5.4 trillion the US spends on healthcare annually is "absorbed by middlemen such as insurers, pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs), and drug distributors."
"Healthcare middlemen profit when drug costs are high because they make money off of drug margin or payments that are linked to the price of a drug, ripping off patients who pay more than they should. Medicare Part D and the patients it serves should stop footing the bill for inflated drug prices and instead pay for drugs in a more transparent manner that reduces middleman margin," wrote the senators.
The Finance Committee will develop policies to eliminate abuses in the prescription drug supply chain including "egregious drug price markups," and to ensure that patient cost-sharing on drugs more closely aligns with the costs to plans and PBMs.
Finally, the Democrats said they would work to fix the "unmitigated disaster" that Trump and Kennedy have been "for innovation and drug development," as the administration has proposed slashing the National Institutes of Health budget by 40% and has cut off access to treatment for an estimated 74,000 patients who were enrolled in NIH clinical trials.
The Finance Committee, they said, plans to create new incentives for innovation and drug development, including through the tax code.
In their flash report, the Democrats wrote that while failing to force Big Pharma to the negotiating table to save money for Americans, Trump "has been parading Big Pharma executives through the White House, claiming to be cutting cost-saving deals with these corporations."
"One look under the hood reveals the truth: Trump is giving them a pass on tariffs, while receiving zero commitments about how they will lower costs for taxpayers and patients," they wrote. "Donald Trump is getting fleeced by Big Pharma CEOs, and Americans are going to foot the bill."
Welch said that the president "loves to talk a big game and make promises to working families about lowering prescription drug prices. But in reality, his administration is handling this like a PR problem: They’ve got to keep moving and talking about it, but then do nothing to really address the crisis."
“Democrats are determined to bring prices down, and we’re willing to work with anyone to find concrete ways to do it," said Welch. "We’re going to lower healthcare costs and ensure everyone can access affordable, lifesaving, and pain-relieving medication.”