SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Looking back at President Obama's first year in office, The Nation
asked members of its community to give their assesment of his performance. You can share your take on Obama's highest and lowest moments in the
form provided here. Here is historian Howard Zinn's response:
I've been searching hard for a highlight. The only thing that comes
close is some of Obama's rhetoric; I don't see any kind of a highlight
in his actions and policies.
As far as disappointments, I wasn't terribly disappointed because I
didn't expect that much. I expected him to be a traditional Democratic
president. On foreign policy, that's hardly any different from a
Republican--as nationalist, expansionist, imperial and warlike. So in
that sense, there's no expectation and no disappointment. On domestic
policy, traditionally Democratic presidents are more reformist, closer
to the labor movement, more willing to pass legislation on behalf of
ordinary people--and that's been true of Obama. But Democratic reforms
have also been limited, cautious. Obama's no exception. On healthcare,
for example, he starts out with a compromise, and when you start out
with a compromise, you end with a compromise of a compromise, which is
where we are now.
I thought that in the area of constitutional rights he would be better
than he has been. That's the greatest disappointment, because Obama went
to Harvard Law School and is presumably dedicated to constitutional
rights. But he becomes president, and he's not making any significant
step away from Bush policies. Sure, he keeps talking about closing
Guantanamo, but he still treats the prisoners there as "suspected
terrorists." They have not been tried and have not been found guilty. So
when Obama proposes taking people out of Guantanamo and putting
them into other prisons, he's not advancing the cause of constitutional
rights very far. And then he's gone into court arguing for preventive
detention, and he's continued the policy of sending suspects to
countries where they very well may be tortured.
I think people are dazzled by Obama's rhetoric, and that people ought to
begin to understand that Obama is going to be a mediocre
president--which means, in our time, a dangerous president--unless there
is some national movement to push him in a better direction.
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Looking back at President Obama's first year in office, The Nation
asked members of its community to give their assesment of his performance. You can share your take on Obama's highest and lowest moments in the
form provided here. Here is historian Howard Zinn's response:
I've been searching hard for a highlight. The only thing that comes
close is some of Obama's rhetoric; I don't see any kind of a highlight
in his actions and policies.
As far as disappointments, I wasn't terribly disappointed because I
didn't expect that much. I expected him to be a traditional Democratic
president. On foreign policy, that's hardly any different from a
Republican--as nationalist, expansionist, imperial and warlike. So in
that sense, there's no expectation and no disappointment. On domestic
policy, traditionally Democratic presidents are more reformist, closer
to the labor movement, more willing to pass legislation on behalf of
ordinary people--and that's been true of Obama. But Democratic reforms
have also been limited, cautious. Obama's no exception. On healthcare,
for example, he starts out with a compromise, and when you start out
with a compromise, you end with a compromise of a compromise, which is
where we are now.
I thought that in the area of constitutional rights he would be better
than he has been. That's the greatest disappointment, because Obama went
to Harvard Law School and is presumably dedicated to constitutional
rights. But he becomes president, and he's not making any significant
step away from Bush policies. Sure, he keeps talking about closing
Guantanamo, but he still treats the prisoners there as "suspected
terrorists." They have not been tried and have not been found guilty. So
when Obama proposes taking people out of Guantanamo and putting
them into other prisons, he's not advancing the cause of constitutional
rights very far. And then he's gone into court arguing for preventive
detention, and he's continued the policy of sending suspects to
countries where they very well may be tortured.
I think people are dazzled by Obama's rhetoric, and that people ought to
begin to understand that Obama is going to be a mediocre
president--which means, in our time, a dangerous president--unless there
is some national movement to push him in a better direction.
Looking back at President Obama's first year in office, The Nation
asked members of its community to give their assesment of his performance. You can share your take on Obama's highest and lowest moments in the
form provided here. Here is historian Howard Zinn's response:
I've been searching hard for a highlight. The only thing that comes
close is some of Obama's rhetoric; I don't see any kind of a highlight
in his actions and policies.
As far as disappointments, I wasn't terribly disappointed because I
didn't expect that much. I expected him to be a traditional Democratic
president. On foreign policy, that's hardly any different from a
Republican--as nationalist, expansionist, imperial and warlike. So in
that sense, there's no expectation and no disappointment. On domestic
policy, traditionally Democratic presidents are more reformist, closer
to the labor movement, more willing to pass legislation on behalf of
ordinary people--and that's been true of Obama. But Democratic reforms
have also been limited, cautious. Obama's no exception. On healthcare,
for example, he starts out with a compromise, and when you start out
with a compromise, you end with a compromise of a compromise, which is
where we are now.
I thought that in the area of constitutional rights he would be better
than he has been. That's the greatest disappointment, because Obama went
to Harvard Law School and is presumably dedicated to constitutional
rights. But he becomes president, and he's not making any significant
step away from Bush policies. Sure, he keeps talking about closing
Guantanamo, but he still treats the prisoners there as "suspected
terrorists." They have not been tried and have not been found guilty. So
when Obama proposes taking people out of Guantanamo and putting
them into other prisons, he's not advancing the cause of constitutional
rights very far. And then he's gone into court arguing for preventive
detention, and he's continued the policy of sending suspects to
countries where they very well may be tortured.
I think people are dazzled by Obama's rhetoric, and that people ought to
begin to understand that Obama is going to be a mediocre
president--which means, in our time, a dangerous president--unless there
is some national movement to push him in a better direction.