SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Children Should Not Have to Choose between Being Trafficked or Extreme Violence
President Obama's plan to allow Central American children to apply for refugee status in their home country is a step in the right direction to protect vulnerable kids and young adults. Still, there is more the president and Congress can do to provide for the best interests of the children who are seeking safety and an opportunity for a better life in the United States.
Oct 07, 2014
President Obama's plan to allow Central American children to apply for refugee status in their home country is a step in the right direction to protect vulnerable kids and young adults. Still, there is more the president and Congress can do to provide for the best interests of the children who are seeking safety and an opportunity for a better life in the United States.
The administration's plan provides youth with an alternative to the treacherous conditions of traveling to the U.S. border. By trekking from Central America through Mexico, they face the threats of gang violence or recruitment, rape or sexual assault, or human trafficking and exploitation (pdf). By having the option to apply to become refugees in-country, these children can seek the U.S. government's assistance by showing how they are endangered by the crime and violence in their respective countries.
But allowing children to apply for refugee status may not stave the flow of minors willing to make the dangerous journey to flee the violence and severe poverty of their home countries. Children are desperately trying to escape from Honduras, which has the world's highest homicide rate, El Salvador, which is rife with gang violence, and Guatemala, which has been plagued with poverty. With the specifics for in-country processing still to be worked out, these young people who are facing extreme violence every day may not have the luxury of waiting for their applications for refugee status to be approved.
Moreover, although the number of unaccompanied minors dropped in August, the 4,000 slots allocated for refugees from Latin America and the Caribbean for fiscal year 2015 is grossly insufficient.
In June alone, more than 10,000 unaccompanied minors crossed the U.S. border and in the ten months since October 2013, nearly 63,000 children have been identified at the border. The administration needs to increase the number of slots allocated for refugees from Latin America or complement this plan with other humanitarian relief to make an impact.
All of this doesn't include the children that U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has already picked up at the border who need to be carefully screened for protection claims. During their arduous journey, many of the children have been hurt or victimized in a crime, including human trafficking. A quarter of the clients served by the Freedom Network (USA), a national alliance of experienced advocates working with survivors of all forms of human trafficking, are from Central America and Mexico. Under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act, these children are entitled to a court hearing to determine whether they need valuable services and qualify for assistance as victims of this serious crime. But the aim should be to prevent the abuse and trafficking from taking place at all.
The administration and Congress can do more to help these vulnerable children. They should prioritize funding for immigration courts so they can evaluate the needs of tens of thousands of children that have fled to the United States. They should also increase funding for HHS to provide shelter and services for these minors. Finally, the Department of Homeland Security should provide them with an explanation of their rights and a list of free, local service providers so they can have adequate legal assistance.
The president's plan should be only the first step in assisting these vulnerable children.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Ivy Suriyopas
Ivy Suriyopas is a co-chair of the Freedom Network (USA) and a steering member of the New York Anti-Trafficking Network. She is also the director of the Anti-Trafficking Initiative at the Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund.
childrencustoms and border protection (cbp)el salvadorhondurashuman rightsimmigrationrefugeessexual assault
President Obama's plan to allow Central American children to apply for refugee status in their home country is a step in the right direction to protect vulnerable kids and young adults. Still, there is more the president and Congress can do to provide for the best interests of the children who are seeking safety and an opportunity for a better life in the United States.
The administration's plan provides youth with an alternative to the treacherous conditions of traveling to the U.S. border. By trekking from Central America through Mexico, they face the threats of gang violence or recruitment, rape or sexual assault, or human trafficking and exploitation (pdf). By having the option to apply to become refugees in-country, these children can seek the U.S. government's assistance by showing how they are endangered by the crime and violence in their respective countries.
But allowing children to apply for refugee status may not stave the flow of minors willing to make the dangerous journey to flee the violence and severe poverty of their home countries. Children are desperately trying to escape from Honduras, which has the world's highest homicide rate, El Salvador, which is rife with gang violence, and Guatemala, which has been plagued with poverty. With the specifics for in-country processing still to be worked out, these young people who are facing extreme violence every day may not have the luxury of waiting for their applications for refugee status to be approved.
Moreover, although the number of unaccompanied minors dropped in August, the 4,000 slots allocated for refugees from Latin America and the Caribbean for fiscal year 2015 is grossly insufficient.
In June alone, more than 10,000 unaccompanied minors crossed the U.S. border and in the ten months since October 2013, nearly 63,000 children have been identified at the border. The administration needs to increase the number of slots allocated for refugees from Latin America or complement this plan with other humanitarian relief to make an impact.
All of this doesn't include the children that U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has already picked up at the border who need to be carefully screened for protection claims. During their arduous journey, many of the children have been hurt or victimized in a crime, including human trafficking. A quarter of the clients served by the Freedom Network (USA), a national alliance of experienced advocates working with survivors of all forms of human trafficking, are from Central America and Mexico. Under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act, these children are entitled to a court hearing to determine whether they need valuable services and qualify for assistance as victims of this serious crime. But the aim should be to prevent the abuse and trafficking from taking place at all.
The administration and Congress can do more to help these vulnerable children. They should prioritize funding for immigration courts so they can evaluate the needs of tens of thousands of children that have fled to the United States. They should also increase funding for HHS to provide shelter and services for these minors. Finally, the Department of Homeland Security should provide them with an explanation of their rights and a list of free, local service providers so they can have adequate legal assistance.
The president's plan should be only the first step in assisting these vulnerable children.
Ivy Suriyopas
Ivy Suriyopas is a co-chair of the Freedom Network (USA) and a steering member of the New York Anti-Trafficking Network. She is also the director of the Anti-Trafficking Initiative at the Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund.
President Obama's plan to allow Central American children to apply for refugee status in their home country is a step in the right direction to protect vulnerable kids and young adults. Still, there is more the president and Congress can do to provide for the best interests of the children who are seeking safety and an opportunity for a better life in the United States.
The administration's plan provides youth with an alternative to the treacherous conditions of traveling to the U.S. border. By trekking from Central America through Mexico, they face the threats of gang violence or recruitment, rape or sexual assault, or human trafficking and exploitation (pdf). By having the option to apply to become refugees in-country, these children can seek the U.S. government's assistance by showing how they are endangered by the crime and violence in their respective countries.
But allowing children to apply for refugee status may not stave the flow of minors willing to make the dangerous journey to flee the violence and severe poverty of their home countries. Children are desperately trying to escape from Honduras, which has the world's highest homicide rate, El Salvador, which is rife with gang violence, and Guatemala, which has been plagued with poverty. With the specifics for in-country processing still to be worked out, these young people who are facing extreme violence every day may not have the luxury of waiting for their applications for refugee status to be approved.
Moreover, although the number of unaccompanied minors dropped in August, the 4,000 slots allocated for refugees from Latin America and the Caribbean for fiscal year 2015 is grossly insufficient.
In June alone, more than 10,000 unaccompanied minors crossed the U.S. border and in the ten months since October 2013, nearly 63,000 children have been identified at the border. The administration needs to increase the number of slots allocated for refugees from Latin America or complement this plan with other humanitarian relief to make an impact.
All of this doesn't include the children that U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has already picked up at the border who need to be carefully screened for protection claims. During their arduous journey, many of the children have been hurt or victimized in a crime, including human trafficking. A quarter of the clients served by the Freedom Network (USA), a national alliance of experienced advocates working with survivors of all forms of human trafficking, are from Central America and Mexico. Under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act, these children are entitled to a court hearing to determine whether they need valuable services and qualify for assistance as victims of this serious crime. But the aim should be to prevent the abuse and trafficking from taking place at all.
The administration and Congress can do more to help these vulnerable children. They should prioritize funding for immigration courts so they can evaluate the needs of tens of thousands of children that have fled to the United States. They should also increase funding for HHS to provide shelter and services for these minors. Finally, the Department of Homeland Security should provide them with an explanation of their rights and a list of free, local service providers so they can have adequate legal assistance.
The president's plan should be only the first step in assisting these vulnerable children.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.