Sep 17, 2015
The U.S. Census Bureau released data this week showing little to no improvement in poverty and family incomes in 2014, despite a falling unemployment rate.
This frustrating state of affairs is directly related to high levels of inequality and stagnant wages, which have kept poverty rates much higher than they should be given that we've had more than five straight years of economic growth. The problem is that despite workers' increased productivity and higher levels of education, the economic gains have concentrated at the top of the income ladder, leaving workers with flat or declining wages and chronic economic insecurity.
It's clear that we need more aggressive action on inequality and poverty. But, at the same time, the Census data also confirm the dramatic role that our social insurance and assistance programs play in protecting families from hardship and boosting economic security for low- and middle-income families.
For example, the Supplemental Poverty Measure, which takes into account a more comprehensive set of family resources and expenses, shows that last year Social Security lifted 25.9 million people out of poverty and the Earned Income and Child Tax credits kept 9.8 million people out of poverty. Similarly, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and affordable housing protected 4.7 million and 2.5 million people, respectively. Moreover, recent research shows that without our nation's social safety net, the poverty rate would be nearly twice as high--with nearly 30 percent of Americans living in poverty!
The safety net assists working-age people across all levels of education. The combination of these programs--ranging from Social Security and Unemployment Insurance to nutrition assistance and tax credits for working-class families--boosted the average income of the most vulnerable workers by 22 percent. For working-age people with a post-secondary education, average incomes increased by between 6 and 12 percent.
These policies don't just lift families above our meager poverty line. They boost long-term employment, educational, and health outcomes for children, and increase family economic security in an economy that is increasingly only working for the wealthy few.
In order to build on the successes of these programs we need to act now and implement policies that we know work: boost wages and labor standards for low-wage workers and promote full employment; invest in nutrition, education, affordable housing, healthcare, and tax credits like the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) and the Child Tax Credit (CTC); and remove barriers that keep people trapped in poverty such as our broken criminal justice system and predatory loans.
Thankfully, we're seeing progress on many of these fronts. We learned from the new data that last year the Affordable Care Act resulted in the largest drop in the uninsured rate since the Census Bureau began tracking it-- there were 8.8 million fewer people without health insurance than in the preceding year. There is now bipartisan momentum to reform the criminal justice system. Workers are organizing for a higher minimum wage in states across the country. Finally, a new overtime rule from the Obama administration would boost pay for millions of workers.
The bad news is that vital programs are at risk of cuts. Conservatives have already indicated that they will not make a routine fix to Social Security's funding formula without extracting a pound of flesh through cuts to critical programs for people with disabilities. Key provisions in the EITC and CTC are set to expire in 2017; if Congress fails to act, it would push 16 million Americans into poverty or deeper into poverty. The House and Senate Republican Budgets deeply slash SNAP and Medicaid. And the tight caps and cuts to annual funding levels caused by sequestration and the Budget Control Act of 2010 have left critical investments such as those in affordable housing and education vulnerable to even deeper cuts.
Basic economic security would be weakened by conservative budget proposals this year, despite the fact that no policymaker's district is immune from poverty. The tables below shows the poverty and child poverty rates in the districts represented by Members of the Senate Finance and House Ways and Means committees, which have jurisdiction over key antipoverty programs like Social Security, and the Earned Income and Child Tax credits.
The new Census data underscore that we still have a lot of work to do when it comes to reducing poverty and inequality. We know the good policies that we need right now. It's time to turn up the heat and call on all of our representatives to make good policy a reality.
House Committee on Ways and Means
Name | Party | District | Overall Poverty Rate | Child Poverty Rate |
Paul Ryan | R | WI-1 | 11.75% | 17.47% |
Sam Johnson | R | TX-3 | 7.14% | 8.96% |
Kevin Brady | R | TX-8 | 12.57% | 17.02% |
Devin Nunes | R | CA-22 | 21.46% | 28.46% |
Pat Tiberi | R | OH-12 | 10.25% | 11.58% |
Dave G. Reichart | R | WA-8 | 10.35% | 13.15% |
Charles W. Boustany Jr. | R | LA-3 | 17.61% | 23.20% |
Peter Roskam | R | IL-6 | 5.72% | 7.73% |
Tom Price | R | GA-6 | 9.63% | 14.13% |
Vern Buchanan | R | FL-16 | 11.99% | 19.19% |
Adrian Smith | R | NE-3 | 12.98% | 16.77% |
Lynn Jenkins | R | KS-2 | 15.30% | 23.23% |
Erick Paulsen | R | MN-3 | 6.43% | 8.96% |
Kenny Marchant | R | TX-24 | 10.61% | 16.48% |
Diane Black | R | TN-6 | 14.81% | 20.04% |
Tom Reed | R | NY-23 | 17.17% | 22.97% |
Todd Young | R | IN-9 | 14.42% | 17.63% |
Mike Kelly | R | PA-3 | 13.26% | 19.22% |
Jim Renacci | R | OH-16 | 7.63% | 10.03% |
Patrick Meehan | R | PA-7 | 6.63% | 8.16% |
Kristi Noem | R | SD-At Large | 14.17% | 17.67% |
George Holding | R | NC-13 | 10.60% | 14.77% |
Jason Smith | R | MO-8 | 20.56% | 28.08% |
Bob Dold | R | IL-10 | 9.79% | 12.87% |
Sander M. Levin | D | MI-9 | 14.89% | 23.31% |
Charles B. Rangel | D | NY-23 | 29.77% | 38.90% |
Jim McDermott | D | WA-7 | 12.31% | 12.68% |
John Lewis | D | GA-5 | 23.95% | 38.13% |
Richard E. Neal | D | MA-1 | 15.46% | 23.03% |
Xavier Becerra | D | CA-37 | 23.24% | 32.47% |
Lloyd Doggett | D | TX-35 | 25.34% | 35.91% |
Mike Thompson | D | CA-5 | 11.83% | 14.40% |
John B. Larson | D | CT-1 | 11.74% | 16.62% |
Earl Blumenauer | D | OR-3 | 18.19% | 23.00% |
Ron Kind | D | WI-3 | 13.82% | 15.82% |
Bill Pascrell Jr. | D | NJ-9 | 17.25% | 24.03% |
Joseph Crowley | D | NY-14 | 17.57% | 24.60% |
Danny Davis | D | IL-7 | 25.00% | 37.13% |
Linda Sanchez | D | CA-38 | 11.53% | 14.47% |
Senate Committee on Finance
Name | Party | State | Overall Poverty Rate | Child Poverty Rate |
Orrin G. Hatch | R | UT | 11.73% | 13.00% |
Chuch Grassley | R | IA | 12.24% | 14.92% |
Mike Crapo | R | ID | 14.85% | 18.53% |
Pat Roberts | R | KS | 13.56% | 17.37% |
Michael B. Enzi | R | WY | 11.19% | 12.10% |
John Cornyn | R | TX | 17.17% | 24.31% |
John Thune | R | SD | 14.17% | 17.67% |
Richard Burr | R | NC | 17.22% | 23.96% |
Johnny Isakson | R | GA | 18.30% | 26.09% |
Rob Portman | R | OH | 15.84% | 22.54% |
Patrick J. Toomey | R | PA | 13.60% | 18.99% |
Dan Coats | R | IN | 15.24% | 21.18% |
Dean Heller | R | NV | 15.24% | 21.74% |
Tim Scott | R | SC | 17.99% | 26.73% |
Ron Wyden | D | OR | 16.55% | 21.10% |
Charles E. Schumer | D | NY | 15.93% | 22.24% |
Debbie Stabenow | D | MI | 16.20% | 22.19% |
Maria Cantwell | D | WA | 13.19% | 17.01% |
Bill Nelson | D | FL | 16.50% | 23.50% |
Robert Menendez | D | NJ | 11.10% | 15.67% |
Thomas R. Carper | D | DE | 12.48% | 17.51% |
Benjamin L. Cardin | D | MD | 10.11% | 12.70% |
Sherrod Brown | D | OH | 15.84% | 22.54% |
Michael F. Bennett | D | CO | 12.04% | 15.12% |
Robert P. Casey, Jr. | D | PA | 13.60% | 18.99% |
Mark R. Warner | D | VA | 11.80% | 15.47% |
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
© 2023 TalkPoverty.org
Melissa Boteach
Melissa Boteach is the Vice President of the Poverty to Prosperity Program and Half in Ten Education Fund at the Center for American Progress. You can follow her on Twitter @mboteach.
The U.S. Census Bureau released data this week showing little to no improvement in poverty and family incomes in 2014, despite a falling unemployment rate.
This frustrating state of affairs is directly related to high levels of inequality and stagnant wages, which have kept poverty rates much higher than they should be given that we've had more than five straight years of economic growth. The problem is that despite workers' increased productivity and higher levels of education, the economic gains have concentrated at the top of the income ladder, leaving workers with flat or declining wages and chronic economic insecurity.
It's clear that we need more aggressive action on inequality and poverty. But, at the same time, the Census data also confirm the dramatic role that our social insurance and assistance programs play in protecting families from hardship and boosting economic security for low- and middle-income families.
For example, the Supplemental Poverty Measure, which takes into account a more comprehensive set of family resources and expenses, shows that last year Social Security lifted 25.9 million people out of poverty and the Earned Income and Child Tax credits kept 9.8 million people out of poverty. Similarly, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and affordable housing protected 4.7 million and 2.5 million people, respectively. Moreover, recent research shows that without our nation's social safety net, the poverty rate would be nearly twice as high--with nearly 30 percent of Americans living in poverty!
The safety net assists working-age people across all levels of education. The combination of these programs--ranging from Social Security and Unemployment Insurance to nutrition assistance and tax credits for working-class families--boosted the average income of the most vulnerable workers by 22 percent. For working-age people with a post-secondary education, average incomes increased by between 6 and 12 percent.
These policies don't just lift families above our meager poverty line. They boost long-term employment, educational, and health outcomes for children, and increase family economic security in an economy that is increasingly only working for the wealthy few.
In order to build on the successes of these programs we need to act now and implement policies that we know work: boost wages and labor standards for low-wage workers and promote full employment; invest in nutrition, education, affordable housing, healthcare, and tax credits like the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) and the Child Tax Credit (CTC); and remove barriers that keep people trapped in poverty such as our broken criminal justice system and predatory loans.
Thankfully, we're seeing progress on many of these fronts. We learned from the new data that last year the Affordable Care Act resulted in the largest drop in the uninsured rate since the Census Bureau began tracking it-- there were 8.8 million fewer people without health insurance than in the preceding year. There is now bipartisan momentum to reform the criminal justice system. Workers are organizing for a higher minimum wage in states across the country. Finally, a new overtime rule from the Obama administration would boost pay for millions of workers.
The bad news is that vital programs are at risk of cuts. Conservatives have already indicated that they will not make a routine fix to Social Security's funding formula without extracting a pound of flesh through cuts to critical programs for people with disabilities. Key provisions in the EITC and CTC are set to expire in 2017; if Congress fails to act, it would push 16 million Americans into poverty or deeper into poverty. The House and Senate Republican Budgets deeply slash SNAP and Medicaid. And the tight caps and cuts to annual funding levels caused by sequestration and the Budget Control Act of 2010 have left critical investments such as those in affordable housing and education vulnerable to even deeper cuts.
Basic economic security would be weakened by conservative budget proposals this year, despite the fact that no policymaker's district is immune from poverty. The tables below shows the poverty and child poverty rates in the districts represented by Members of the Senate Finance and House Ways and Means committees, which have jurisdiction over key antipoverty programs like Social Security, and the Earned Income and Child Tax credits.
The new Census data underscore that we still have a lot of work to do when it comes to reducing poverty and inequality. We know the good policies that we need right now. It's time to turn up the heat and call on all of our representatives to make good policy a reality.
House Committee on Ways and Means
Name | Party | District | Overall Poverty Rate | Child Poverty Rate |
Paul Ryan | R | WI-1 | 11.75% | 17.47% |
Sam Johnson | R | TX-3 | 7.14% | 8.96% |
Kevin Brady | R | TX-8 | 12.57% | 17.02% |
Devin Nunes | R | CA-22 | 21.46% | 28.46% |
Pat Tiberi | R | OH-12 | 10.25% | 11.58% |
Dave G. Reichart | R | WA-8 | 10.35% | 13.15% |
Charles W. Boustany Jr. | R | LA-3 | 17.61% | 23.20% |
Peter Roskam | R | IL-6 | 5.72% | 7.73% |
Tom Price | R | GA-6 | 9.63% | 14.13% |
Vern Buchanan | R | FL-16 | 11.99% | 19.19% |
Adrian Smith | R | NE-3 | 12.98% | 16.77% |
Lynn Jenkins | R | KS-2 | 15.30% | 23.23% |
Erick Paulsen | R | MN-3 | 6.43% | 8.96% |
Kenny Marchant | R | TX-24 | 10.61% | 16.48% |
Diane Black | R | TN-6 | 14.81% | 20.04% |
Tom Reed | R | NY-23 | 17.17% | 22.97% |
Todd Young | R | IN-9 | 14.42% | 17.63% |
Mike Kelly | R | PA-3 | 13.26% | 19.22% |
Jim Renacci | R | OH-16 | 7.63% | 10.03% |
Patrick Meehan | R | PA-7 | 6.63% | 8.16% |
Kristi Noem | R | SD-At Large | 14.17% | 17.67% |
George Holding | R | NC-13 | 10.60% | 14.77% |
Jason Smith | R | MO-8 | 20.56% | 28.08% |
Bob Dold | R | IL-10 | 9.79% | 12.87% |
Sander M. Levin | D | MI-9 | 14.89% | 23.31% |
Charles B. Rangel | D | NY-23 | 29.77% | 38.90% |
Jim McDermott | D | WA-7 | 12.31% | 12.68% |
John Lewis | D | GA-5 | 23.95% | 38.13% |
Richard E. Neal | D | MA-1 | 15.46% | 23.03% |
Xavier Becerra | D | CA-37 | 23.24% | 32.47% |
Lloyd Doggett | D | TX-35 | 25.34% | 35.91% |
Mike Thompson | D | CA-5 | 11.83% | 14.40% |
John B. Larson | D | CT-1 | 11.74% | 16.62% |
Earl Blumenauer | D | OR-3 | 18.19% | 23.00% |
Ron Kind | D | WI-3 | 13.82% | 15.82% |
Bill Pascrell Jr. | D | NJ-9 | 17.25% | 24.03% |
Joseph Crowley | D | NY-14 | 17.57% | 24.60% |
Danny Davis | D | IL-7 | 25.00% | 37.13% |
Linda Sanchez | D | CA-38 | 11.53% | 14.47% |
Senate Committee on Finance
Name | Party | State | Overall Poverty Rate | Child Poverty Rate |
Orrin G. Hatch | R | UT | 11.73% | 13.00% |
Chuch Grassley | R | IA | 12.24% | 14.92% |
Mike Crapo | R | ID | 14.85% | 18.53% |
Pat Roberts | R | KS | 13.56% | 17.37% |
Michael B. Enzi | R | WY | 11.19% | 12.10% |
John Cornyn | R | TX | 17.17% | 24.31% |
John Thune | R | SD | 14.17% | 17.67% |
Richard Burr | R | NC | 17.22% | 23.96% |
Johnny Isakson | R | GA | 18.30% | 26.09% |
Rob Portman | R | OH | 15.84% | 22.54% |
Patrick J. Toomey | R | PA | 13.60% | 18.99% |
Dan Coats | R | IN | 15.24% | 21.18% |
Dean Heller | R | NV | 15.24% | 21.74% |
Tim Scott | R | SC | 17.99% | 26.73% |
Ron Wyden | D | OR | 16.55% | 21.10% |
Charles E. Schumer | D | NY | 15.93% | 22.24% |
Debbie Stabenow | D | MI | 16.20% | 22.19% |
Maria Cantwell | D | WA | 13.19% | 17.01% |
Bill Nelson | D | FL | 16.50% | 23.50% |
Robert Menendez | D | NJ | 11.10% | 15.67% |
Thomas R. Carper | D | DE | 12.48% | 17.51% |
Benjamin L. Cardin | D | MD | 10.11% | 12.70% |
Sherrod Brown | D | OH | 15.84% | 22.54% |
Michael F. Bennett | D | CO | 12.04% | 15.12% |
Robert P. Casey, Jr. | D | PA | 13.60% | 18.99% |
Mark R. Warner | D | VA | 11.80% | 15.47% |
Melissa Boteach
Melissa Boteach is the Vice President of the Poverty to Prosperity Program and Half in Ten Education Fund at the Center for American Progress. You can follow her on Twitter @mboteach.
The U.S. Census Bureau released data this week showing little to no improvement in poverty and family incomes in 2014, despite a falling unemployment rate.
This frustrating state of affairs is directly related to high levels of inequality and stagnant wages, which have kept poverty rates much higher than they should be given that we've had more than five straight years of economic growth. The problem is that despite workers' increased productivity and higher levels of education, the economic gains have concentrated at the top of the income ladder, leaving workers with flat or declining wages and chronic economic insecurity.
It's clear that we need more aggressive action on inequality and poverty. But, at the same time, the Census data also confirm the dramatic role that our social insurance and assistance programs play in protecting families from hardship and boosting economic security for low- and middle-income families.
For example, the Supplemental Poverty Measure, which takes into account a more comprehensive set of family resources and expenses, shows that last year Social Security lifted 25.9 million people out of poverty and the Earned Income and Child Tax credits kept 9.8 million people out of poverty. Similarly, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and affordable housing protected 4.7 million and 2.5 million people, respectively. Moreover, recent research shows that without our nation's social safety net, the poverty rate would be nearly twice as high--with nearly 30 percent of Americans living in poverty!
The safety net assists working-age people across all levels of education. The combination of these programs--ranging from Social Security and Unemployment Insurance to nutrition assistance and tax credits for working-class families--boosted the average income of the most vulnerable workers by 22 percent. For working-age people with a post-secondary education, average incomes increased by between 6 and 12 percent.
These policies don't just lift families above our meager poverty line. They boost long-term employment, educational, and health outcomes for children, and increase family economic security in an economy that is increasingly only working for the wealthy few.
In order to build on the successes of these programs we need to act now and implement policies that we know work: boost wages and labor standards for low-wage workers and promote full employment; invest in nutrition, education, affordable housing, healthcare, and tax credits like the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) and the Child Tax Credit (CTC); and remove barriers that keep people trapped in poverty such as our broken criminal justice system and predatory loans.
Thankfully, we're seeing progress on many of these fronts. We learned from the new data that last year the Affordable Care Act resulted in the largest drop in the uninsured rate since the Census Bureau began tracking it-- there were 8.8 million fewer people without health insurance than in the preceding year. There is now bipartisan momentum to reform the criminal justice system. Workers are organizing for a higher minimum wage in states across the country. Finally, a new overtime rule from the Obama administration would boost pay for millions of workers.
The bad news is that vital programs are at risk of cuts. Conservatives have already indicated that they will not make a routine fix to Social Security's funding formula without extracting a pound of flesh through cuts to critical programs for people with disabilities. Key provisions in the EITC and CTC are set to expire in 2017; if Congress fails to act, it would push 16 million Americans into poverty or deeper into poverty. The House and Senate Republican Budgets deeply slash SNAP and Medicaid. And the tight caps and cuts to annual funding levels caused by sequestration and the Budget Control Act of 2010 have left critical investments such as those in affordable housing and education vulnerable to even deeper cuts.
Basic economic security would be weakened by conservative budget proposals this year, despite the fact that no policymaker's district is immune from poverty. The tables below shows the poverty and child poverty rates in the districts represented by Members of the Senate Finance and House Ways and Means committees, which have jurisdiction over key antipoverty programs like Social Security, and the Earned Income and Child Tax credits.
The new Census data underscore that we still have a lot of work to do when it comes to reducing poverty and inequality. We know the good policies that we need right now. It's time to turn up the heat and call on all of our representatives to make good policy a reality.
House Committee on Ways and Means
Name | Party | District | Overall Poverty Rate | Child Poverty Rate |
Paul Ryan | R | WI-1 | 11.75% | 17.47% |
Sam Johnson | R | TX-3 | 7.14% | 8.96% |
Kevin Brady | R | TX-8 | 12.57% | 17.02% |
Devin Nunes | R | CA-22 | 21.46% | 28.46% |
Pat Tiberi | R | OH-12 | 10.25% | 11.58% |
Dave G. Reichart | R | WA-8 | 10.35% | 13.15% |
Charles W. Boustany Jr. | R | LA-3 | 17.61% | 23.20% |
Peter Roskam | R | IL-6 | 5.72% | 7.73% |
Tom Price | R | GA-6 | 9.63% | 14.13% |
Vern Buchanan | R | FL-16 | 11.99% | 19.19% |
Adrian Smith | R | NE-3 | 12.98% | 16.77% |
Lynn Jenkins | R | KS-2 | 15.30% | 23.23% |
Erick Paulsen | R | MN-3 | 6.43% | 8.96% |
Kenny Marchant | R | TX-24 | 10.61% | 16.48% |
Diane Black | R | TN-6 | 14.81% | 20.04% |
Tom Reed | R | NY-23 | 17.17% | 22.97% |
Todd Young | R | IN-9 | 14.42% | 17.63% |
Mike Kelly | R | PA-3 | 13.26% | 19.22% |
Jim Renacci | R | OH-16 | 7.63% | 10.03% |
Patrick Meehan | R | PA-7 | 6.63% | 8.16% |
Kristi Noem | R | SD-At Large | 14.17% | 17.67% |
George Holding | R | NC-13 | 10.60% | 14.77% |
Jason Smith | R | MO-8 | 20.56% | 28.08% |
Bob Dold | R | IL-10 | 9.79% | 12.87% |
Sander M. Levin | D | MI-9 | 14.89% | 23.31% |
Charles B. Rangel | D | NY-23 | 29.77% | 38.90% |
Jim McDermott | D | WA-7 | 12.31% | 12.68% |
John Lewis | D | GA-5 | 23.95% | 38.13% |
Richard E. Neal | D | MA-1 | 15.46% | 23.03% |
Xavier Becerra | D | CA-37 | 23.24% | 32.47% |
Lloyd Doggett | D | TX-35 | 25.34% | 35.91% |
Mike Thompson | D | CA-5 | 11.83% | 14.40% |
John B. Larson | D | CT-1 | 11.74% | 16.62% |
Earl Blumenauer | D | OR-3 | 18.19% | 23.00% |
Ron Kind | D | WI-3 | 13.82% | 15.82% |
Bill Pascrell Jr. | D | NJ-9 | 17.25% | 24.03% |
Joseph Crowley | D | NY-14 | 17.57% | 24.60% |
Danny Davis | D | IL-7 | 25.00% | 37.13% |
Linda Sanchez | D | CA-38 | 11.53% | 14.47% |
Senate Committee on Finance
Name | Party | State | Overall Poverty Rate | Child Poverty Rate |
Orrin G. Hatch | R | UT | 11.73% | 13.00% |
Chuch Grassley | R | IA | 12.24% | 14.92% |
Mike Crapo | R | ID | 14.85% | 18.53% |
Pat Roberts | R | KS | 13.56% | 17.37% |
Michael B. Enzi | R | WY | 11.19% | 12.10% |
John Cornyn | R | TX | 17.17% | 24.31% |
John Thune | R | SD | 14.17% | 17.67% |
Richard Burr | R | NC | 17.22% | 23.96% |
Johnny Isakson | R | GA | 18.30% | 26.09% |
Rob Portman | R | OH | 15.84% | 22.54% |
Patrick J. Toomey | R | PA | 13.60% | 18.99% |
Dan Coats | R | IN | 15.24% | 21.18% |
Dean Heller | R | NV | 15.24% | 21.74% |
Tim Scott | R | SC | 17.99% | 26.73% |
Ron Wyden | D | OR | 16.55% | 21.10% |
Charles E. Schumer | D | NY | 15.93% | 22.24% |
Debbie Stabenow | D | MI | 16.20% | 22.19% |
Maria Cantwell | D | WA | 13.19% | 17.01% |
Bill Nelson | D | FL | 16.50% | 23.50% |
Robert Menendez | D | NJ | 11.10% | 15.67% |
Thomas R. Carper | D | DE | 12.48% | 17.51% |
Benjamin L. Cardin | D | MD | 10.11% | 12.70% |
Sherrod Brown | D | OH | 15.84% | 22.54% |
Michael F. Bennett | D | CO | 12.04% | 15.12% |
Robert P. Casey, Jr. | D | PA | 13.60% | 18.99% |
Mark R. Warner | D | VA | 11.80% | 15.47% |
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.