SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
In California and Beyond, Sanders Democrats and Independents Needed to Stop Trump
Only unconventional thinking will vanquish the unconventional, anti-establishment GOP candidate
Jun 07, 2016
Despite the acrimony and deep ideological debate raging within the Democratic Party, the vast majority of both Clinton and Sanders supporters know America must defeat Donald Trump. They just vehemently disagree about how to best ensure his loss.
Californi a primary voters can force Democrats to engage productively across the divide if they mak e the unconventional political move to register the big picture, not simply the dynamics within the Democratic National Committee confines.
First, it's important to understand the Gordian impasse. Clinton supporters and DNC leadership believe Sanders is a spoiler who must concede--yesterday .
As a result of Monday's premature announcement by the Associated Press that Clinton has the delegates to claim the nomination, they believe Clinton can rely on time to bring Sanders supporters into her fold. Conventional wisdom suggests Clinton needn't worry about earning their votes and must now pivot right. As the first woman presidential nominee, they believe her message of being "qualified" and "ready to lead on Day 1" combined with amassing opposition research and offering a steady stream of attacks on Donald Trump will deliver her to the Oval Office.
"The country deserves outside-the-DNC-box thinking at this moment of national existential crisis, because what seems lost on Clinton and the DNC--and the television news media--is that preventing this nomination process from running its full course will only increase acrimony and alienation. Time alone, in tumultous and uncharted 2016, will not heal the divide for much of the Sanders bloc. "
This opinion ignores the volatile and anti-establishment climate of 2016 and applies an old playbook, which led the DNC to watch their preferred candidate's vast inevitability disintegrate into a neck-and-neck nail-biter when challenged by a 74-year-old Democratic Socialist with no establishment or corporate backing. It also ignores the fact that all conventional attacks and critical media reports have thus far only ricocheted off Trump and even emboldened his reality-TV candidacy.
Sanders supporters believe an arcane and biased nomination process will hand Clinton the nomination and leave the party with a candidate whose private email-server activities are still under FBI investigation and who was publicly rebuked by the State Department for breaking rules and putting her personal privacy above national security. They cite months of general election match-up polls showing Sanders as the stronger candidate against Trump, and worry that Clinton's unfavorables are the highest of any Democratic nominee in the last ten presidential cycles.
Whether the DNC is propping up a weakened politician against an insurgent celebrity who seduced enough voters to implode the GOP establishment is up for debate, but the question is legitimate for voters other than Sanders partisans with America facing a potential Trump presidendcy.
It is wise to consider the fact that Clinton is the grande dame of Democratic establishment politics at a moment when "establishment" is a pejorative to many millions of Americans on the left and right. B y contrast, the Sanders campaign presented a mix of policy ideas and messaging that gained momentum over time and resonate deeply with half the Democratic party, a generation of young voters , and more independents on the left and right.
The country deserves outside-the-DNC-box thinking at this moment of national existential crisis, because what seems lost on Clinton and the DNC--and the television news media--is that preventing this nomination process from running its full course will only increase acrimony and alienation. Time alone, in tumultous and uncharted 2016, will not heal the divide for much of the Sanders bloc.
Clinton could earn their votes by being inclusive of their concerns and ideas through compromise and commitments, and when these voters feel represented, the party and nation will benefit from the unconventional thinking, creativity and dynamism the Sanders movement can offer.
Instead, Clinton and her advisors stick to the "never given an inch" strategy, despite thought leaders from the Sanders wing imploring her to change tactics. Growing progressive resistance convinced the DNC to allow Sanders to make picks for the platform committee, but to bring about the true unity that will get all Democrats rooting and working for the nominee, Clinton must be politically motivated to address the concerns of half her party and to get help in successfully reaching out to other Sanders voters--particularly the new generation of young voters and activists she and her surrogates have repeatedly attacked as being "conned" and "uninformed."
This is where California Democrats and independents can make the difference today.
Delivering a decisive primary win for Sanders is the safest way to politically ensure a reluctant Clinton excercises leadership and calls on the best ideas and strategies. With a unified and collaborative party behind her, Clinton will improve her sagging numbers against Trump. Without it? Do California voters want to risk relying on a playbook that tore the Democratic Party in two, and leave Trump an opening to prey on those who feel disenfranchised?
If neither candidate secures the 2,383 pledged delegates necessary to claim the nomination by June 14, DNC rules stipulate both candidates can take their case to the convention and superdelegates. Whether yesterday's oddly-timed announcement aimed at suppressing voter turnout here in delegate-rich California is unknown, but this media subversion of democracy only further exacerbated Democratic Party divisions.
California has the power to counter these divisive moves today by awarding Sanders the political clout to , if not win the nomination, move Clinton and party leadership at an open convention to incorporate more of the creative and bold policy and messaging ideas that, in these anti-establishment times, have proven most effective in resonating beyond the party-loyalist base.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Jennifer Nix
Jennifer Nix is a writer and political activist based in San Francisco. Over the years she's been a fellow at both CREDO Action and the DC-based think-tank NDN/New Policy Institute, a co-founder of the international school building non-profit BuildOn, and publisher of Pulitzer Prize-winner Glenn Greenwald's first book, the New York Times best-seller, How Would a Patriot Act? Nix was also editor-at-large for Chelsea Green Publishing, a producer for National Public Radio's "On the Media" and a staff writer for Variety. Her freelance work has appeared in New York, The New York Observer, The Nation, the National Law Journal, the Village Voice, the San Francisco Chronicle and Wired as well as on Salon, Huffington Post, Poetry Foundation, The Rumpus, Alternet and many political blogs. She is currently at work on a memoir about her family's journey with kidney disease (drawn from "I Love My Socialist Kidney"), is a producer for the documentary, "Robert Bly :A Thousand Years of Joy" and her essay, "Pressing On" is featured in the new anthology, Here She Comes Now: Women in Music Who Have Changed Our Lives.
Despite the acrimony and deep ideological debate raging within the Democratic Party, the vast majority of both Clinton and Sanders supporters know America must defeat Donald Trump. They just vehemently disagree about how to best ensure his loss.
Californi a primary voters can force Democrats to engage productively across the divide if they mak e the unconventional political move to register the big picture, not simply the dynamics within the Democratic National Committee confines.
First, it's important to understand the Gordian impasse. Clinton supporters and DNC leadership believe Sanders is a spoiler who must concede--yesterday .
As a result of Monday's premature announcement by the Associated Press that Clinton has the delegates to claim the nomination, they believe Clinton can rely on time to bring Sanders supporters into her fold. Conventional wisdom suggests Clinton needn't worry about earning their votes and must now pivot right. As the first woman presidential nominee, they believe her message of being "qualified" and "ready to lead on Day 1" combined with amassing opposition research and offering a steady stream of attacks on Donald Trump will deliver her to the Oval Office.
"The country deserves outside-the-DNC-box thinking at this moment of national existential crisis, because what seems lost on Clinton and the DNC--and the television news media--is that preventing this nomination process from running its full course will only increase acrimony and alienation. Time alone, in tumultous and uncharted 2016, will not heal the divide for much of the Sanders bloc. "
This opinion ignores the volatile and anti-establishment climate of 2016 and applies an old playbook, which led the DNC to watch their preferred candidate's vast inevitability disintegrate into a neck-and-neck nail-biter when challenged by a 74-year-old Democratic Socialist with no establishment or corporate backing. It also ignores the fact that all conventional attacks and critical media reports have thus far only ricocheted off Trump and even emboldened his reality-TV candidacy.
Sanders supporters believe an arcane and biased nomination process will hand Clinton the nomination and leave the party with a candidate whose private email-server activities are still under FBI investigation and who was publicly rebuked by the State Department for breaking rules and putting her personal privacy above national security. They cite months of general election match-up polls showing Sanders as the stronger candidate against Trump, and worry that Clinton's unfavorables are the highest of any Democratic nominee in the last ten presidential cycles.
Whether the DNC is propping up a weakened politician against an insurgent celebrity who seduced enough voters to implode the GOP establishment is up for debate, but the question is legitimate for voters other than Sanders partisans with America facing a potential Trump presidendcy.
It is wise to consider the fact that Clinton is the grande dame of Democratic establishment politics at a moment when "establishment" is a pejorative to many millions of Americans on the left and right. B y contrast, the Sanders campaign presented a mix of policy ideas and messaging that gained momentum over time and resonate deeply with half the Democratic party, a generation of young voters , and more independents on the left and right.
The country deserves outside-the-DNC-box thinking at this moment of national existential crisis, because what seems lost on Clinton and the DNC--and the television news media--is that preventing this nomination process from running its full course will only increase acrimony and alienation. Time alone, in tumultous and uncharted 2016, will not heal the divide for much of the Sanders bloc.
Clinton could earn their votes by being inclusive of their concerns and ideas through compromise and commitments, and when these voters feel represented, the party and nation will benefit from the unconventional thinking, creativity and dynamism the Sanders movement can offer.
Instead, Clinton and her advisors stick to the "never given an inch" strategy, despite thought leaders from the Sanders wing imploring her to change tactics. Growing progressive resistance convinced the DNC to allow Sanders to make picks for the platform committee, but to bring about the true unity that will get all Democrats rooting and working for the nominee, Clinton must be politically motivated to address the concerns of half her party and to get help in successfully reaching out to other Sanders voters--particularly the new generation of young voters and activists she and her surrogates have repeatedly attacked as being "conned" and "uninformed."
This is where California Democrats and independents can make the difference today.
Delivering a decisive primary win for Sanders is the safest way to politically ensure a reluctant Clinton excercises leadership and calls on the best ideas and strategies. With a unified and collaborative party behind her, Clinton will improve her sagging numbers against Trump. Without it? Do California voters want to risk relying on a playbook that tore the Democratic Party in two, and leave Trump an opening to prey on those who feel disenfranchised?
If neither candidate secures the 2,383 pledged delegates necessary to claim the nomination by June 14, DNC rules stipulate both candidates can take their case to the convention and superdelegates. Whether yesterday's oddly-timed announcement aimed at suppressing voter turnout here in delegate-rich California is unknown, but this media subversion of democracy only further exacerbated Democratic Party divisions.
California has the power to counter these divisive moves today by awarding Sanders the political clout to , if not win the nomination, move Clinton and party leadership at an open convention to incorporate more of the creative and bold policy and messaging ideas that, in these anti-establishment times, have proven most effective in resonating beyond the party-loyalist base.
Jennifer Nix
Jennifer Nix is a writer and political activist based in San Francisco. Over the years she's been a fellow at both CREDO Action and the DC-based think-tank NDN/New Policy Institute, a co-founder of the international school building non-profit BuildOn, and publisher of Pulitzer Prize-winner Glenn Greenwald's first book, the New York Times best-seller, How Would a Patriot Act? Nix was also editor-at-large for Chelsea Green Publishing, a producer for National Public Radio's "On the Media" and a staff writer for Variety. Her freelance work has appeared in New York, The New York Observer, The Nation, the National Law Journal, the Village Voice, the San Francisco Chronicle and Wired as well as on Salon, Huffington Post, Poetry Foundation, The Rumpus, Alternet and many political blogs. She is currently at work on a memoir about her family's journey with kidney disease (drawn from "I Love My Socialist Kidney"), is a producer for the documentary, "Robert Bly :A Thousand Years of Joy" and her essay, "Pressing On" is featured in the new anthology, Here She Comes Now: Women in Music Who Have Changed Our Lives.
Despite the acrimony and deep ideological debate raging within the Democratic Party, the vast majority of both Clinton and Sanders supporters know America must defeat Donald Trump. They just vehemently disagree about how to best ensure his loss.
Californi a primary voters can force Democrats to engage productively across the divide if they mak e the unconventional political move to register the big picture, not simply the dynamics within the Democratic National Committee confines.
First, it's important to understand the Gordian impasse. Clinton supporters and DNC leadership believe Sanders is a spoiler who must concede--yesterday .
As a result of Monday's premature announcement by the Associated Press that Clinton has the delegates to claim the nomination, they believe Clinton can rely on time to bring Sanders supporters into her fold. Conventional wisdom suggests Clinton needn't worry about earning their votes and must now pivot right. As the first woman presidential nominee, they believe her message of being "qualified" and "ready to lead on Day 1" combined with amassing opposition research and offering a steady stream of attacks on Donald Trump will deliver her to the Oval Office.
"The country deserves outside-the-DNC-box thinking at this moment of national existential crisis, because what seems lost on Clinton and the DNC--and the television news media--is that preventing this nomination process from running its full course will only increase acrimony and alienation. Time alone, in tumultous and uncharted 2016, will not heal the divide for much of the Sanders bloc. "
This opinion ignores the volatile and anti-establishment climate of 2016 and applies an old playbook, which led the DNC to watch their preferred candidate's vast inevitability disintegrate into a neck-and-neck nail-biter when challenged by a 74-year-old Democratic Socialist with no establishment or corporate backing. It also ignores the fact that all conventional attacks and critical media reports have thus far only ricocheted off Trump and even emboldened his reality-TV candidacy.
Sanders supporters believe an arcane and biased nomination process will hand Clinton the nomination and leave the party with a candidate whose private email-server activities are still under FBI investigation and who was publicly rebuked by the State Department for breaking rules and putting her personal privacy above national security. They cite months of general election match-up polls showing Sanders as the stronger candidate against Trump, and worry that Clinton's unfavorables are the highest of any Democratic nominee in the last ten presidential cycles.
Whether the DNC is propping up a weakened politician against an insurgent celebrity who seduced enough voters to implode the GOP establishment is up for debate, but the question is legitimate for voters other than Sanders partisans with America facing a potential Trump presidendcy.
It is wise to consider the fact that Clinton is the grande dame of Democratic establishment politics at a moment when "establishment" is a pejorative to many millions of Americans on the left and right. B y contrast, the Sanders campaign presented a mix of policy ideas and messaging that gained momentum over time and resonate deeply with half the Democratic party, a generation of young voters , and more independents on the left and right.
The country deserves outside-the-DNC-box thinking at this moment of national existential crisis, because what seems lost on Clinton and the DNC--and the television news media--is that preventing this nomination process from running its full course will only increase acrimony and alienation. Time alone, in tumultous and uncharted 2016, will not heal the divide for much of the Sanders bloc.
Clinton could earn their votes by being inclusive of their concerns and ideas through compromise and commitments, and when these voters feel represented, the party and nation will benefit from the unconventional thinking, creativity and dynamism the Sanders movement can offer.
Instead, Clinton and her advisors stick to the "never given an inch" strategy, despite thought leaders from the Sanders wing imploring her to change tactics. Growing progressive resistance convinced the DNC to allow Sanders to make picks for the platform committee, but to bring about the true unity that will get all Democrats rooting and working for the nominee, Clinton must be politically motivated to address the concerns of half her party and to get help in successfully reaching out to other Sanders voters--particularly the new generation of young voters and activists she and her surrogates have repeatedly attacked as being "conned" and "uninformed."
This is where California Democrats and independents can make the difference today.
Delivering a decisive primary win for Sanders is the safest way to politically ensure a reluctant Clinton excercises leadership and calls on the best ideas and strategies. With a unified and collaborative party behind her, Clinton will improve her sagging numbers against Trump. Without it? Do California voters want to risk relying on a playbook that tore the Democratic Party in two, and leave Trump an opening to prey on those who feel disenfranchised?
If neither candidate secures the 2,383 pledged delegates necessary to claim the nomination by June 14, DNC rules stipulate both candidates can take their case to the convention and superdelegates. Whether yesterday's oddly-timed announcement aimed at suppressing voter turnout here in delegate-rich California is unknown, but this media subversion of democracy only further exacerbated Democratic Party divisions.
California has the power to counter these divisive moves today by awarding Sanders the political clout to , if not win the nomination, move Clinton and party leadership at an open convention to incorporate more of the creative and bold policy and messaging ideas that, in these anti-establishment times, have proven most effective in resonating beyond the party-loyalist base.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.