SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Trump does not actually have the power to "withdraw federal protection for transgender students" unilaterally. (Screenshot)
Trump Didn't 'Revoke' Protections for Trans Students-Because He Can't
If you're concerned that someone has authoritarian tendencies, the worst thing you can do is treat them like they have the power to rewrite the law. Yet that's what many media outlets did in reporting on Donald Trump's withdrawal of the Obama administration's guidance to schools on the rights of transgender students.
Feb 23, 2017
If you're concerned that someone has authoritarian tendencies, the worst thing you can do is treat them like they have the power to rewrite the law. Yet that's what many media outlets did in reporting on Donald Trump's withdrawal of the Obama administration's guidance to schools on the rights of transgender students.
In various headlines (mostly gathered by the New Civil Rights Movement website--2/22/17), the Trump administration was said to "roll back" (Washington Post, 2/22/17), "rescind" (Huffington Post, 2/22/17), "withdraw" (CNN, 2/23/17; The Hill, 2/22/17), or "revoke" (Slate, 2/22/17) protection for transgender students.
The problem with this framing is that Trump does not have the power to unilaterally change what rights transgender students have. These rights derive from Title IX, a federal law passed in 1972, that bars discrimination based on gender in publicly funded schools. It was a series of federal court rulings, not the Obama administration's say-so, that found that protection against gender discrimination extends to trans people.
The Obama guidance to school administrators was about, among other things, how they should allow trans students to use restrooms that correspond with their gender identity. Its withdrawal, New Civil Rights Movement's David Badash says, is "a wink and a nod," a telegraphing that the Justice Department under Trump will not vigorously enforce Title IX, at least when it comes to transgender children.
As Lambda Legal, a leading defender of LGBTQ rights, said in a blog post (2/22/17), "Trump's actions do not change the law itself--transgender students remain protected by Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972--but abandoning the guidance intentionally creates confusion about what federal law requires."
Journalists should not contribute to that confusion.In an era where the White House is bent on taking away rights from vulnerable groups, journalists need to be very clear in explaining what rights we still have.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
© 2023 Fairness and Accuracy In Reporting (FAIR)
Jim Naureckas
Jim Naureckas is editor of FAIR (Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting). He is the co-author of "Way Things Aren't: Rush Limbaugh's Reign of Error." He was an investigative reporter for In These Times and managing editor of the Washington Report on the Hemisphere.
If you're concerned that someone has authoritarian tendencies, the worst thing you can do is treat them like they have the power to rewrite the law. Yet that's what many media outlets did in reporting on Donald Trump's withdrawal of the Obama administration's guidance to schools on the rights of transgender students.
In various headlines (mostly gathered by the New Civil Rights Movement website--2/22/17), the Trump administration was said to "roll back" (Washington Post, 2/22/17), "rescind" (Huffington Post, 2/22/17), "withdraw" (CNN, 2/23/17; The Hill, 2/22/17), or "revoke" (Slate, 2/22/17) protection for transgender students.
The problem with this framing is that Trump does not have the power to unilaterally change what rights transgender students have. These rights derive from Title IX, a federal law passed in 1972, that bars discrimination based on gender in publicly funded schools. It was a series of federal court rulings, not the Obama administration's say-so, that found that protection against gender discrimination extends to trans people.
The Obama guidance to school administrators was about, among other things, how they should allow trans students to use restrooms that correspond with their gender identity. Its withdrawal, New Civil Rights Movement's David Badash says, is "a wink and a nod," a telegraphing that the Justice Department under Trump will not vigorously enforce Title IX, at least when it comes to transgender children.
As Lambda Legal, a leading defender of LGBTQ rights, said in a blog post (2/22/17), "Trump's actions do not change the law itself--transgender students remain protected by Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972--but abandoning the guidance intentionally creates confusion about what federal law requires."
Journalists should not contribute to that confusion.In an era where the White House is bent on taking away rights from vulnerable groups, journalists need to be very clear in explaining what rights we still have.
Jim Naureckas
Jim Naureckas is editor of FAIR (Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting). He is the co-author of "Way Things Aren't: Rush Limbaugh's Reign of Error." He was an investigative reporter for In These Times and managing editor of the Washington Report on the Hemisphere.
If you're concerned that someone has authoritarian tendencies, the worst thing you can do is treat them like they have the power to rewrite the law. Yet that's what many media outlets did in reporting on Donald Trump's withdrawal of the Obama administration's guidance to schools on the rights of transgender students.
In various headlines (mostly gathered by the New Civil Rights Movement website--2/22/17), the Trump administration was said to "roll back" (Washington Post, 2/22/17), "rescind" (Huffington Post, 2/22/17), "withdraw" (CNN, 2/23/17; The Hill, 2/22/17), or "revoke" (Slate, 2/22/17) protection for transgender students.
The problem with this framing is that Trump does not have the power to unilaterally change what rights transgender students have. These rights derive from Title IX, a federal law passed in 1972, that bars discrimination based on gender in publicly funded schools. It was a series of federal court rulings, not the Obama administration's say-so, that found that protection against gender discrimination extends to trans people.
The Obama guidance to school administrators was about, among other things, how they should allow trans students to use restrooms that correspond with their gender identity. Its withdrawal, New Civil Rights Movement's David Badash says, is "a wink and a nod," a telegraphing that the Justice Department under Trump will not vigorously enforce Title IX, at least when it comes to transgender children.
As Lambda Legal, a leading defender of LGBTQ rights, said in a blog post (2/22/17), "Trump's actions do not change the law itself--transgender students remain protected by Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972--but abandoning the guidance intentionally creates confusion about what federal law requires."
Journalists should not contribute to that confusion.In an era where the White House is bent on taking away rights from vulnerable groups, journalists need to be very clear in explaining what rights we still have.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.