NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden is just one in a long line of whistleblowers who risked life and liberty to tell the American people--and the world--about the corrupt and illegal practices of the U.S. government. (Photo: Laura Poitras)
Trump's Ukraine Scandal Shows Why Whistleblowers Are So Vital to Democracy
Both Republican and Democratic lawmakers have consistently demonized people who share information with the press and public.
Donald Trump is now closer than ever to being impeached by the House. Speaker Nancy Pelosi has finally opened the door to bringing charges after Trump was caught pressuring a foreign country to help him win the 2020 election and trying to stifle a whistleblower complaint.
And if impeachment indeed happens, we'll have not only that whistleblower to thank, but also leaks to the press.
As everyone now knows -- and has been confirmed by a rough transcript released by the White House itself -- Trump tried to push Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskiy to investigate Democratic presidential hopeful Joe Biden's son, Hunter. Trump even offered up the Justice Department's services to Zelenskiy in any potential criminal investigation he wished to conduct into the younger Biden.
Up until a week ago, though, the public and Congress weren't aware of any of these facts. We knew only that an unnamed intelligence official had filed a Trump-related complaint with the Director of National Intelligence (DNI), and the DNI had refused to hand over the whistleblower report to Congress, despite being required to by law.
While that initial controversy did get some media coverage, it wouldn't have been anything close to the scandal it is today if not for some dogged reporting by several news outlets. Newspapers like the Washington Post and the New York Times soon started publishing bits of information allegedly contained within the whistleblower complaint.
First we learned that the complaint involved President Trump. Then we learned that it centered on a call with a foreign leader. Finally, we learned that it involved a call with the Ukrainian president and Trump's alleged attempts to pressure Ukraine to help investigate Hunter Biden.
All of this information (which has since been made public by Trump himself) was almost certainly classified. The person or people who leaked it to the Washington Post and other newspapers were breaking the law.
Leaks to the press -- which the Justice Department considers highly illegal -- have always been vital to democracy. The Pentagon Papers leak in the 1970s sparked the Watergate scandal and, eventually, Nixon's resignation. George W. Bush's illegal warrantless wiretapping program and torture regime were exposed only because of those willing to break the law to tell journalists. We wouldn't know anything about drone strikes or unprecedented cyberattacks under the Obama administration without leaks. And long before this scandal, classified leaks stopped some of Trump's worst impulses.
"Lawmakers should commend not only the initial whistleblower's bravery, but also those who had the guts to do the right thing and go to the press when the official process was being stifled."
Yet members of the national security establishment constantly condemn leaks as "damaging" to national security without considering the massive public benefit they have on accountability. Intelligence agencies have always claimed whistleblowers should only go through the internal whistleblower channels, which have always been badly broken and have left many whistleblowers retaliated against, fired, or worse. Many have now laid claim that this Trump case shows that the "proper channels" work. In fact, the opposite is true.
While the whistleblower did not leak anything themselves, a primary reason this is the biggest story in the country right now is because of the person (or people) who continued to give classified details about the whistleblower complaint to the press. The leaks pushed the story forward, rocketed it to the front pages of every major newspaper in the country, and led Democrats of all stripes to make the most forceful calls for impeachment yet -- all of this before anyone even saw the rough phone transcript Trump released on Wednesday.
While the DNI was purposefully withholding the complaint from Congress, now, thanks to all the pressure, the office officially submitted it on Wednesday.
Thanks to massive public pressure, the whistleblower will likely be heard by Congress. And when that person does go before the intelligence committee, the lawmakers assembled should commend not only the initial whistleblower's bravery, but also those who had the guts to do the right thing and go to the press when the official process was being stifled.
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just hours left in our Spring Campaign, we're still falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Donald Trump is now closer than ever to being impeached by the House. Speaker Nancy Pelosi has finally opened the door to bringing charges after Trump was caught pressuring a foreign country to help him win the 2020 election and trying to stifle a whistleblower complaint.
And if impeachment indeed happens, we'll have not only that whistleblower to thank, but also leaks to the press.
As everyone now knows -- and has been confirmed by a rough transcript released by the White House itself -- Trump tried to push Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskiy to investigate Democratic presidential hopeful Joe Biden's son, Hunter. Trump even offered up the Justice Department's services to Zelenskiy in any potential criminal investigation he wished to conduct into the younger Biden.
Up until a week ago, though, the public and Congress weren't aware of any of these facts. We knew only that an unnamed intelligence official had filed a Trump-related complaint with the Director of National Intelligence (DNI), and the DNI had refused to hand over the whistleblower report to Congress, despite being required to by law.
While that initial controversy did get some media coverage, it wouldn't have been anything close to the scandal it is today if not for some dogged reporting by several news outlets. Newspapers like the Washington Post and the New York Times soon started publishing bits of information allegedly contained within the whistleblower complaint.
First we learned that the complaint involved President Trump. Then we learned that it centered on a call with a foreign leader. Finally, we learned that it involved a call with the Ukrainian president and Trump's alleged attempts to pressure Ukraine to help investigate Hunter Biden.
All of this information (which has since been made public by Trump himself) was almost certainly classified. The person or people who leaked it to the Washington Post and other newspapers were breaking the law.
Leaks to the press -- which the Justice Department considers highly illegal -- have always been vital to democracy. The Pentagon Papers leak in the 1970s sparked the Watergate scandal and, eventually, Nixon's resignation. George W. Bush's illegal warrantless wiretapping program and torture regime were exposed only because of those willing to break the law to tell journalists. We wouldn't know anything about drone strikes or unprecedented cyberattacks under the Obama administration without leaks. And long before this scandal, classified leaks stopped some of Trump's worst impulses.
"Lawmakers should commend not only the initial whistleblower's bravery, but also those who had the guts to do the right thing and go to the press when the official process was being stifled."
Yet members of the national security establishment constantly condemn leaks as "damaging" to national security without considering the massive public benefit they have on accountability. Intelligence agencies have always claimed whistleblowers should only go through the internal whistleblower channels, which have always been badly broken and have left many whistleblowers retaliated against, fired, or worse. Many have now laid claim that this Trump case shows that the "proper channels" work. In fact, the opposite is true.
While the whistleblower did not leak anything themselves, a primary reason this is the biggest story in the country right now is because of the person (or people) who continued to give classified details about the whistleblower complaint to the press. The leaks pushed the story forward, rocketed it to the front pages of every major newspaper in the country, and led Democrats of all stripes to make the most forceful calls for impeachment yet -- all of this before anyone even saw the rough phone transcript Trump released on Wednesday.
While the DNI was purposefully withholding the complaint from Congress, now, thanks to all the pressure, the office officially submitted it on Wednesday.
Thanks to massive public pressure, the whistleblower will likely be heard by Congress. And when that person does go before the intelligence committee, the lawmakers assembled should commend not only the initial whistleblower's bravery, but also those who had the guts to do the right thing and go to the press when the official process was being stifled.
Donald Trump is now closer than ever to being impeached by the House. Speaker Nancy Pelosi has finally opened the door to bringing charges after Trump was caught pressuring a foreign country to help him win the 2020 election and trying to stifle a whistleblower complaint.
And if impeachment indeed happens, we'll have not only that whistleblower to thank, but also leaks to the press.
As everyone now knows -- and has been confirmed by a rough transcript released by the White House itself -- Trump tried to push Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskiy to investigate Democratic presidential hopeful Joe Biden's son, Hunter. Trump even offered up the Justice Department's services to Zelenskiy in any potential criminal investigation he wished to conduct into the younger Biden.
Up until a week ago, though, the public and Congress weren't aware of any of these facts. We knew only that an unnamed intelligence official had filed a Trump-related complaint with the Director of National Intelligence (DNI), and the DNI had refused to hand over the whistleblower report to Congress, despite being required to by law.
While that initial controversy did get some media coverage, it wouldn't have been anything close to the scandal it is today if not for some dogged reporting by several news outlets. Newspapers like the Washington Post and the New York Times soon started publishing bits of information allegedly contained within the whistleblower complaint.
First we learned that the complaint involved President Trump. Then we learned that it centered on a call with a foreign leader. Finally, we learned that it involved a call with the Ukrainian president and Trump's alleged attempts to pressure Ukraine to help investigate Hunter Biden.
All of this information (which has since been made public by Trump himself) was almost certainly classified. The person or people who leaked it to the Washington Post and other newspapers were breaking the law.
Leaks to the press -- which the Justice Department considers highly illegal -- have always been vital to democracy. The Pentagon Papers leak in the 1970s sparked the Watergate scandal and, eventually, Nixon's resignation. George W. Bush's illegal warrantless wiretapping program and torture regime were exposed only because of those willing to break the law to tell journalists. We wouldn't know anything about drone strikes or unprecedented cyberattacks under the Obama administration without leaks. And long before this scandal, classified leaks stopped some of Trump's worst impulses.
"Lawmakers should commend not only the initial whistleblower's bravery, but also those who had the guts to do the right thing and go to the press when the official process was being stifled."
Yet members of the national security establishment constantly condemn leaks as "damaging" to national security without considering the massive public benefit they have on accountability. Intelligence agencies have always claimed whistleblowers should only go through the internal whistleblower channels, which have always been badly broken and have left many whistleblowers retaliated against, fired, or worse. Many have now laid claim that this Trump case shows that the "proper channels" work. In fact, the opposite is true.
While the whistleblower did not leak anything themselves, a primary reason this is the biggest story in the country right now is because of the person (or people) who continued to give classified details about the whistleblower complaint to the press. The leaks pushed the story forward, rocketed it to the front pages of every major newspaper in the country, and led Democrats of all stripes to make the most forceful calls for impeachment yet -- all of this before anyone even saw the rough phone transcript Trump released on Wednesday.
While the DNI was purposefully withholding the complaint from Congress, now, thanks to all the pressure, the office officially submitted it on Wednesday.
Thanks to massive public pressure, the whistleblower will likely be heard by Congress. And when that person does go before the intelligence committee, the lawmakers assembled should commend not only the initial whistleblower's bravery, but also those who had the guts to do the right thing and go to the press when the official process was being stifled.