Connect the World or Capture It? Critics Raise Alarm Over Facebook's Spurious Internet.org
Facebook service promises free web access for the developing world, while threatening the privacy and rights of hundreds of millions worldwide
Privacy rights and open internet advocates are sounding the alarm after Facebook on Monday announced changes to its "free" Internet for the developing world, dubbed Internet.org, which critics say threatens to make the social networking company the de facto Internet "gatekeeper" for hundreds of millions worldwide.
Branded as an initiative to "connect the two thirds of the world that doesn't have internet access," Internet.org will reportedly work with local telecom providers to provide free Internet access to a handful of pre-selected websites--including Facebook--as well as others related to "health, education, communication, finance, jobs and local information." The application has already launched in a number of African and Southeast Asian countries, as well as Colombia in South America.
Internet.org has previously come under fire for violating the principle of net neutrality because it only offers access to certain websites. In India, a number of major publications including the Times of India media group have withdrawn from the site in protest.
In response to that critique, in a video address on Monday, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerburg announced a new platform model, under which Facebook will offer "an open program for developers" to create "very simple and data efficient" sites to be among those offered to Internet.org users.
"Giving people more choice over the services they use is incredibly important," Facebook said.
"However they may want to present Internet.org, Facebook are not in the business of philanthropy, they're in the business of making money,"
--Paul Bernal, University of East Anglia
However, this new platform is even worse, argues Josh Levy, advocacy director for the digital rights group Access.
The change, Levy writes at Wired on Tuesday, "sets Facebook up to serve as a quasi-internet service provider--except that unlike a local or national telco, all web traffic will be routed through Facebook's servers. In other words, for people using Internet.org to connect to the internet, Facebook will be the de facto gatekeeper of the world's information."
Considering the market that Internet.org hopes to reach, that amounts to hundreds of millions of people worldwide. On April 17, Zuckerburg said that more than 800 million people in nine countries, including Kenya, Zambia, Tanzania, India, Indonesia, and the Philippines, already have access to the site.
In addition, Levy warns that by excluding commonly used security protocols, such as SSL and TLS, in their criteria for potential developers, Internet.org threatens to "undermine the security" of their users.
Further, Facebook's new platform "lacks transparency," as it has failed to disclose important policy details regarding the storage of and government requests for user data.
As Vice journalist Jordan Pearson points out, because Internet.org user access will be routed through Facebook's servers, the company will "get a huge amount of insight into users' online activity." What's more, Internet.org users will be subject to Facebook's data policy, which leaves open the possibility for their information to be shared with advertisers as well as the Facebook's partner organizations.
"However they may want to present Internet.org, Facebook are not in the business of philanthropy, they're in the business of making money," Paul Bernal, professor of technology law at the UK-based University of East Anglia, told Pearson. "With Internet.org that means two things: capturing a market, then using that market. They want people to be hooked in, and then their data is, effectively, controlled by Facebook. In the current era, if you can control someone's data, you have a huge amount of control over them."
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Privacy rights and open internet advocates are sounding the alarm after Facebook on Monday announced changes to its "free" Internet for the developing world, dubbed Internet.org, which critics say threatens to make the social networking company the de facto Internet "gatekeeper" for hundreds of millions worldwide.
Branded as an initiative to "connect the two thirds of the world that doesn't have internet access," Internet.org will reportedly work with local telecom providers to provide free Internet access to a handful of pre-selected websites--including Facebook--as well as others related to "health, education, communication, finance, jobs and local information." The application has already launched in a number of African and Southeast Asian countries, as well as Colombia in South America.
Internet.org has previously come under fire for violating the principle of net neutrality because it only offers access to certain websites. In India, a number of major publications including the Times of India media group have withdrawn from the site in protest.
In response to that critique, in a video address on Monday, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerburg announced a new platform model, under which Facebook will offer "an open program for developers" to create "very simple and data efficient" sites to be among those offered to Internet.org users.
"Giving people more choice over the services they use is incredibly important," Facebook said.
"However they may want to present Internet.org, Facebook are not in the business of philanthropy, they're in the business of making money,"
--Paul Bernal, University of East Anglia
However, this new platform is even worse, argues Josh Levy, advocacy director for the digital rights group Access.
The change, Levy writes at Wired on Tuesday, "sets Facebook up to serve as a quasi-internet service provider--except that unlike a local or national telco, all web traffic will be routed through Facebook's servers. In other words, for people using Internet.org to connect to the internet, Facebook will be the de facto gatekeeper of the world's information."
Considering the market that Internet.org hopes to reach, that amounts to hundreds of millions of people worldwide. On April 17, Zuckerburg said that more than 800 million people in nine countries, including Kenya, Zambia, Tanzania, India, Indonesia, and the Philippines, already have access to the site.
In addition, Levy warns that by excluding commonly used security protocols, such as SSL and TLS, in their criteria for potential developers, Internet.org threatens to "undermine the security" of their users.
Further, Facebook's new platform "lacks transparency," as it has failed to disclose important policy details regarding the storage of and government requests for user data.
As Vice journalist Jordan Pearson points out, because Internet.org user access will be routed through Facebook's servers, the company will "get a huge amount of insight into users' online activity." What's more, Internet.org users will be subject to Facebook's data policy, which leaves open the possibility for their information to be shared with advertisers as well as the Facebook's partner organizations.
"However they may want to present Internet.org, Facebook are not in the business of philanthropy, they're in the business of making money," Paul Bernal, professor of technology law at the UK-based University of East Anglia, told Pearson. "With Internet.org that means two things: capturing a market, then using that market. They want people to be hooked in, and then their data is, effectively, controlled by Facebook. In the current era, if you can control someone's data, you have a huge amount of control over them."
Privacy rights and open internet advocates are sounding the alarm after Facebook on Monday announced changes to its "free" Internet for the developing world, dubbed Internet.org, which critics say threatens to make the social networking company the de facto Internet "gatekeeper" for hundreds of millions worldwide.
Branded as an initiative to "connect the two thirds of the world that doesn't have internet access," Internet.org will reportedly work with local telecom providers to provide free Internet access to a handful of pre-selected websites--including Facebook--as well as others related to "health, education, communication, finance, jobs and local information." The application has already launched in a number of African and Southeast Asian countries, as well as Colombia in South America.
Internet.org has previously come under fire for violating the principle of net neutrality because it only offers access to certain websites. In India, a number of major publications including the Times of India media group have withdrawn from the site in protest.
In response to that critique, in a video address on Monday, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerburg announced a new platform model, under which Facebook will offer "an open program for developers" to create "very simple and data efficient" sites to be among those offered to Internet.org users.
"Giving people more choice over the services they use is incredibly important," Facebook said.
"However they may want to present Internet.org, Facebook are not in the business of philanthropy, they're in the business of making money,"
--Paul Bernal, University of East Anglia
However, this new platform is even worse, argues Josh Levy, advocacy director for the digital rights group Access.
The change, Levy writes at Wired on Tuesday, "sets Facebook up to serve as a quasi-internet service provider--except that unlike a local or national telco, all web traffic will be routed through Facebook's servers. In other words, for people using Internet.org to connect to the internet, Facebook will be the de facto gatekeeper of the world's information."
Considering the market that Internet.org hopes to reach, that amounts to hundreds of millions of people worldwide. On April 17, Zuckerburg said that more than 800 million people in nine countries, including Kenya, Zambia, Tanzania, India, Indonesia, and the Philippines, already have access to the site.
In addition, Levy warns that by excluding commonly used security protocols, such as SSL and TLS, in their criteria for potential developers, Internet.org threatens to "undermine the security" of their users.
Further, Facebook's new platform "lacks transparency," as it has failed to disclose important policy details regarding the storage of and government requests for user data.
As Vice journalist Jordan Pearson points out, because Internet.org user access will be routed through Facebook's servers, the company will "get a huge amount of insight into users' online activity." What's more, Internet.org users will be subject to Facebook's data policy, which leaves open the possibility for their information to be shared with advertisers as well as the Facebook's partner organizations.
"However they may want to present Internet.org, Facebook are not in the business of philanthropy, they're in the business of making money," Paul Bernal, professor of technology law at the UK-based University of East Anglia, told Pearson. "With Internet.org that means two things: capturing a market, then using that market. They want people to be hooked in, and then their data is, effectively, controlled by Facebook. In the current era, if you can control someone's data, you have a huge amount of control over them."