Fighting for Next Generation, Kids File Climate Suit Against US Government
Climate scientist James Hansen backs 21 young plaintiffs seeking to 'retain a fighting chance to preserve a habitable climate system'
Claiming that the continued development and burning of fossil fuels violates their constitutional rights, 21 young plaintiffs--ranging in age from 8 to 19--filed a landmark climate change lawsuit against the federal government on Wednesday.
"The federal government has known for decades that CO2 pollution from burning fossil fuels was causing global warming and dangerous climate change," said one of the teenage plaintiffs and youth director of Earth Guardians, 15-year-old Xiuhtezcatl Tonatiuh Martinez of Colorado. "It also knew that continuing to burn fossil fuels would destabilize our climate system, significantly harming my generation and generations to come."
Despite that knowledge, the government "continued to authorize and promote fossil fuel extraction, production, consumption, and all their associated emissions--to the grave detriment of future generations," added attorney Philip Gregory of the California firm Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, a counsel to the plaintiffs.
Lawyers working on the case say a win for the kids would be no less important, from a strictly legal basis, than Brown v. Board of Education, which established the right to equal educational opportunity, or Obergefell v. Hodges, which much more recently established the freedom to marry.
As MSNBC reports, the lawsuit "debuts a new legal framework to fight climate change, one that portrays federal support for the development and use of fossil fuels as a violation of the Fifth and Ninth Amendments, as well as the public trust doctrine."
The public trust doctrine ensures "the rights of present and future generations to those essential natural resources that are of public concern to the citizens of our nation," reads the complaint. "These vital natural resources include at least the air (atmosphere), water, seas, the shores of the sea, and wildlife. The overarching public trust resource is our country's life-sustaining climate system, encompassing our atmosphere, waters, oceans, and biosphere. Defendants must take affirmative steps to protect those trust resources."
The youth's legal complaint (pdf) was accompanied by an "expert declaration" (pdf) from former NASA scientist James Hansen, who first raised the alarm on climate change in 1988. Hansen's granddaughter, 17-year-old Sophie Kivlehan of Pennsylvania, is among the plaintiffs.
"In my opinion, this lawsuit is made necessary by the at-best schizophrenic, if not suicidal, nature of U.S. climate and energy policy," Hansen wrote.
"It is now clear, as the relevant scientific community has established for some time, that continued high CO2 emissions from fossil fuel burning will further disrupt Earth's climate system, and that, in turn, will impose profound and mounting risks of ecological, economic and social collapse," he continued. "In my view, our government's actions and inactions that cause or contribute to those emissions violate the fundamental rights of Sophie, other Youth, and future generations. Those violated rights include the right to life, the right to liberty, the right to property, the right to equal protection under the law, the right to government protection of public trust resources, and the right to retain a fighting chance to preserve a habitable climate system."
"In my opinion, this lawsuit is made necessary by the at-best schizophrenic, if not suicidal, nature of U.S. climate and energy policy."
--James Hansen, climate scientist
The complaint includes each plaintiff's individual story and how climate change harms them now and will harm them in the future if the court does not, as the lawsuit asks, order the federal government to decrease atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide to a safe level.
For example, 15-year-old Nathaniel Baring, of Alaska, is described as an "avid Nordic skier" who has been "harmed by the reduced snowfall in recent years."
Journey Zephier, a 15-year-old who lives with his family in Hawaii, has been adversely impacted by rising sea levels, beach erosion, and ocean acidification.
Eleven-year-old Sahara Valentine, an Oregon resident who has asthma, says her condition has been exacerbated by severe climate change.
And Victoria Barrett, a 16-year-old from New York, "has become emotionally distressed by the increase in superstorms in the Northeast," the complaint reads.
The case is part of a global legal campaign led by Our Children's Trust, a nonprofit organization coordinating federal, state, local, and global efforts to secure the legal right to a healthy atmosphere and stable climate.
There are signs that the strategy could be successful.
In June, an organization partnered with Our Children's Trust won a similar case in the Netherlands. A Dutch court ruled that the government has a legal duty to reduce carbon emissions by 25 percent by 2020.
"The state must do more to avert the imminent danger caused by climate change, also because of its duty of care to protect and improve the living environment," read a statement from the Hague District Court at the time.
In June, a judge in Washington state handed a landmark win to a group of eight young petitioners backed by Our Children's Trust and Hansen. The judge ordered the Department of Ecology (ECY) to consider statewide reductions in carbon dioxide emissions based on the best available science.
"The court's decision brings a feeling of triumph," said 14-year-old petitioner Aji Piper in June. "But I know there is still much work to be done. We may have won a battle, but we're still fighting a bigger war."
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Claiming that the continued development and burning of fossil fuels violates their constitutional rights, 21 young plaintiffs--ranging in age from 8 to 19--filed a landmark climate change lawsuit against the federal government on Wednesday.
"The federal government has known for decades that CO2 pollution from burning fossil fuels was causing global warming and dangerous climate change," said one of the teenage plaintiffs and youth director of Earth Guardians, 15-year-old Xiuhtezcatl Tonatiuh Martinez of Colorado. "It also knew that continuing to burn fossil fuels would destabilize our climate system, significantly harming my generation and generations to come."
Despite that knowledge, the government "continued to authorize and promote fossil fuel extraction, production, consumption, and all their associated emissions--to the grave detriment of future generations," added attorney Philip Gregory of the California firm Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, a counsel to the plaintiffs.
Lawyers working on the case say a win for the kids would be no less important, from a strictly legal basis, than Brown v. Board of Education, which established the right to equal educational opportunity, or Obergefell v. Hodges, which much more recently established the freedom to marry.
As MSNBC reports, the lawsuit "debuts a new legal framework to fight climate change, one that portrays federal support for the development and use of fossil fuels as a violation of the Fifth and Ninth Amendments, as well as the public trust doctrine."
The public trust doctrine ensures "the rights of present and future generations to those essential natural resources that are of public concern to the citizens of our nation," reads the complaint. "These vital natural resources include at least the air (atmosphere), water, seas, the shores of the sea, and wildlife. The overarching public trust resource is our country's life-sustaining climate system, encompassing our atmosphere, waters, oceans, and biosphere. Defendants must take affirmative steps to protect those trust resources."
The youth's legal complaint (pdf) was accompanied by an "expert declaration" (pdf) from former NASA scientist James Hansen, who first raised the alarm on climate change in 1988. Hansen's granddaughter, 17-year-old Sophie Kivlehan of Pennsylvania, is among the plaintiffs.
"In my opinion, this lawsuit is made necessary by the at-best schizophrenic, if not suicidal, nature of U.S. climate and energy policy," Hansen wrote.
"It is now clear, as the relevant scientific community has established for some time, that continued high CO2 emissions from fossil fuel burning will further disrupt Earth's climate system, and that, in turn, will impose profound and mounting risks of ecological, economic and social collapse," he continued. "In my view, our government's actions and inactions that cause or contribute to those emissions violate the fundamental rights of Sophie, other Youth, and future generations. Those violated rights include the right to life, the right to liberty, the right to property, the right to equal protection under the law, the right to government protection of public trust resources, and the right to retain a fighting chance to preserve a habitable climate system."
"In my opinion, this lawsuit is made necessary by the at-best schizophrenic, if not suicidal, nature of U.S. climate and energy policy."
--James Hansen, climate scientist
The complaint includes each plaintiff's individual story and how climate change harms them now and will harm them in the future if the court does not, as the lawsuit asks, order the federal government to decrease atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide to a safe level.
For example, 15-year-old Nathaniel Baring, of Alaska, is described as an "avid Nordic skier" who has been "harmed by the reduced snowfall in recent years."
Journey Zephier, a 15-year-old who lives with his family in Hawaii, has been adversely impacted by rising sea levels, beach erosion, and ocean acidification.
Eleven-year-old Sahara Valentine, an Oregon resident who has asthma, says her condition has been exacerbated by severe climate change.
And Victoria Barrett, a 16-year-old from New York, "has become emotionally distressed by the increase in superstorms in the Northeast," the complaint reads.
The case is part of a global legal campaign led by Our Children's Trust, a nonprofit organization coordinating federal, state, local, and global efforts to secure the legal right to a healthy atmosphere and stable climate.
There are signs that the strategy could be successful.
In June, an organization partnered with Our Children's Trust won a similar case in the Netherlands. A Dutch court ruled that the government has a legal duty to reduce carbon emissions by 25 percent by 2020.
"The state must do more to avert the imminent danger caused by climate change, also because of its duty of care to protect and improve the living environment," read a statement from the Hague District Court at the time.
In June, a judge in Washington state handed a landmark win to a group of eight young petitioners backed by Our Children's Trust and Hansen. The judge ordered the Department of Ecology (ECY) to consider statewide reductions in carbon dioxide emissions based on the best available science.
"The court's decision brings a feeling of triumph," said 14-year-old petitioner Aji Piper in June. "But I know there is still much work to be done. We may have won a battle, but we're still fighting a bigger war."
Claiming that the continued development and burning of fossil fuels violates their constitutional rights, 21 young plaintiffs--ranging in age from 8 to 19--filed a landmark climate change lawsuit against the federal government on Wednesday.
"The federal government has known for decades that CO2 pollution from burning fossil fuels was causing global warming and dangerous climate change," said one of the teenage plaintiffs and youth director of Earth Guardians, 15-year-old Xiuhtezcatl Tonatiuh Martinez of Colorado. "It also knew that continuing to burn fossil fuels would destabilize our climate system, significantly harming my generation and generations to come."
Despite that knowledge, the government "continued to authorize and promote fossil fuel extraction, production, consumption, and all their associated emissions--to the grave detriment of future generations," added attorney Philip Gregory of the California firm Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, a counsel to the plaintiffs.
Lawyers working on the case say a win for the kids would be no less important, from a strictly legal basis, than Brown v. Board of Education, which established the right to equal educational opportunity, or Obergefell v. Hodges, which much more recently established the freedom to marry.
As MSNBC reports, the lawsuit "debuts a new legal framework to fight climate change, one that portrays federal support for the development and use of fossil fuels as a violation of the Fifth and Ninth Amendments, as well as the public trust doctrine."
The public trust doctrine ensures "the rights of present and future generations to those essential natural resources that are of public concern to the citizens of our nation," reads the complaint. "These vital natural resources include at least the air (atmosphere), water, seas, the shores of the sea, and wildlife. The overarching public trust resource is our country's life-sustaining climate system, encompassing our atmosphere, waters, oceans, and biosphere. Defendants must take affirmative steps to protect those trust resources."
The youth's legal complaint (pdf) was accompanied by an "expert declaration" (pdf) from former NASA scientist James Hansen, who first raised the alarm on climate change in 1988. Hansen's granddaughter, 17-year-old Sophie Kivlehan of Pennsylvania, is among the plaintiffs.
"In my opinion, this lawsuit is made necessary by the at-best schizophrenic, if not suicidal, nature of U.S. climate and energy policy," Hansen wrote.
"It is now clear, as the relevant scientific community has established for some time, that continued high CO2 emissions from fossil fuel burning will further disrupt Earth's climate system, and that, in turn, will impose profound and mounting risks of ecological, economic and social collapse," he continued. "In my view, our government's actions and inactions that cause or contribute to those emissions violate the fundamental rights of Sophie, other Youth, and future generations. Those violated rights include the right to life, the right to liberty, the right to property, the right to equal protection under the law, the right to government protection of public trust resources, and the right to retain a fighting chance to preserve a habitable climate system."
"In my opinion, this lawsuit is made necessary by the at-best schizophrenic, if not suicidal, nature of U.S. climate and energy policy."
--James Hansen, climate scientist
The complaint includes each plaintiff's individual story and how climate change harms them now and will harm them in the future if the court does not, as the lawsuit asks, order the federal government to decrease atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide to a safe level.
For example, 15-year-old Nathaniel Baring, of Alaska, is described as an "avid Nordic skier" who has been "harmed by the reduced snowfall in recent years."
Journey Zephier, a 15-year-old who lives with his family in Hawaii, has been adversely impacted by rising sea levels, beach erosion, and ocean acidification.
Eleven-year-old Sahara Valentine, an Oregon resident who has asthma, says her condition has been exacerbated by severe climate change.
And Victoria Barrett, a 16-year-old from New York, "has become emotionally distressed by the increase in superstorms in the Northeast," the complaint reads.
The case is part of a global legal campaign led by Our Children's Trust, a nonprofit organization coordinating federal, state, local, and global efforts to secure the legal right to a healthy atmosphere and stable climate.
There are signs that the strategy could be successful.
In June, an organization partnered with Our Children's Trust won a similar case in the Netherlands. A Dutch court ruled that the government has a legal duty to reduce carbon emissions by 25 percent by 2020.
"The state must do more to avert the imminent danger caused by climate change, also because of its duty of care to protect and improve the living environment," read a statement from the Hague District Court at the time.
In June, a judge in Washington state handed a landmark win to a group of eight young petitioners backed by Our Children's Trust and Hansen. The judge ordered the Department of Ecology (ECY) to consider statewide reductions in carbon dioxide emissions based on the best available science.
"The court's decision brings a feeling of triumph," said 14-year-old petitioner Aji Piper in June. "But I know there is still much work to be done. We may have won a battle, but we're still fighting a bigger war."