'Exxons of Agriculture' Wielding Power to Block Real Climate Solutions: Report
The industry 'fuels a model of agriculture that is destroying the planet,' report states.
Fertilizer companies are the "Exxons of agriculture" and are blocking beneficial climate climate policies with their massive lobbying power, a new report charges.
The publication by GRAIN, an international nonprofit organization that advocates for locally-controlled, biodiversity-based food systems, describes how the fertilizer industry, whose products the group says are responsible for up to 10% of global greenhouse gas emissions, has joined forces with major corporations like Walmart in order to cast itself as a purveyor of "climate smart" policies while protecting its interests.
Yet these so-called "climate smart" polices that rely on the industry's products are anything but, GRAIN states. Take nitrogen fertilizers--they take a lot of energy to produce, and they are increasingly relying on fracked wells for that production. The damage continues once they're applied to fields, the report continues:
The International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) estimates that for every 100 kg of nitrogen fertilizer applied to the soil, one kg ends up in the atmosphere as nitrous oxide (N2O), a gas that is 300 times more potent than CO2 as a greenhouse gas and is the world's most significant ozone-depleting substance. In 2014, this was equivalent to the average annual emissions of 72 million cars driven in the US--about a third of the US fleet of cars and trucks.
"Fertilizer companies, like Yara of Norway, are the Exxons of agriculture," Henk Hobbelink, the Coordinator of GRAIN, said in a media statement. "They fuel a model of agriculture that is destroying the planet and they are doing everything in their power to block action on climate change that would injure their profits."
Case in point of the industry's power to block such action is the Global Alliance for Climate Smart Agriculture. Launched last year at the UN Summit on Climate Change in New York, GACSA's stated goal is "is to improve people's food security and nutrition in the face of climate change."
The report describes it as
the culmination of several years of efforts by the fertilizer lobby to block meaningful action on agriculture and climate change. Of the Alliance's 29 non-governmental founding members, there are three fertilizer industry lobby groups, two of the world's largest fertilizer companies (Yara of Norway and Mosaic of the US), and a handful of organizations working directly with fertilizer companies on climate change programs. Today, 60% of the private sector members of the Alliance still come from the fertilizer industry.
This group deserves no voice at COP21, the upcoming UN climate summit, GRAIN says, as "The elimination of chemical fertilizers is one of the easiest and most effective places to start" to bring about climate change action.
The industry's claims that we can't stop using their products are proven false by various studies showing that agroecological practices can produce the shame yields as industrial agriculture, the report sates.
"We now can say that the use of chemical fertilizers this year will generate more GHG emissions than the total GHG emissions from all of the cars and trucks driven in the US," added Devlin Kuyek, a researcher with GRAIN, in a statement. "The good news is that there is a quick fix for this problem: a worldwide switch to agroecological practices that can achieve the same yields without chemicals."
"Kicking the fertilizer habit is really a matter of politics," the report concludes. "No meaningful action can occur until the fertilizer industry's grip on policy makers is loosened. Let's start making this happen by shutting down the Global Alliance for Climate Smart Agriculture and booting the fertilizer companies out of the COP21 in Paris," it states.
GRAIN was among hundreds of signatories to a statement issued this month calling on governments and decision-makers "to reject the dangerous rhetoric of Climate-Smart Agriculture" and not to endorse such policies as a solution to climate change.
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just three days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Fertilizer companies are the "Exxons of agriculture" and are blocking beneficial climate climate policies with their massive lobbying power, a new report charges.
The publication by GRAIN, an international nonprofit organization that advocates for locally-controlled, biodiversity-based food systems, describes how the fertilizer industry, whose products the group says are responsible for up to 10% of global greenhouse gas emissions, has joined forces with major corporations like Walmart in order to cast itself as a purveyor of "climate smart" policies while protecting its interests.
Yet these so-called "climate smart" polices that rely on the industry's products are anything but, GRAIN states. Take nitrogen fertilizers--they take a lot of energy to produce, and they are increasingly relying on fracked wells for that production. The damage continues once they're applied to fields, the report continues:
The International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) estimates that for every 100 kg of nitrogen fertilizer applied to the soil, one kg ends up in the atmosphere as nitrous oxide (N2O), a gas that is 300 times more potent than CO2 as a greenhouse gas and is the world's most significant ozone-depleting substance. In 2014, this was equivalent to the average annual emissions of 72 million cars driven in the US--about a third of the US fleet of cars and trucks.
"Fertilizer companies, like Yara of Norway, are the Exxons of agriculture," Henk Hobbelink, the Coordinator of GRAIN, said in a media statement. "They fuel a model of agriculture that is destroying the planet and they are doing everything in their power to block action on climate change that would injure their profits."
Case in point of the industry's power to block such action is the Global Alliance for Climate Smart Agriculture. Launched last year at the UN Summit on Climate Change in New York, GACSA's stated goal is "is to improve people's food security and nutrition in the face of climate change."
The report describes it as
the culmination of several years of efforts by the fertilizer lobby to block meaningful action on agriculture and climate change. Of the Alliance's 29 non-governmental founding members, there are three fertilizer industry lobby groups, two of the world's largest fertilizer companies (Yara of Norway and Mosaic of the US), and a handful of organizations working directly with fertilizer companies on climate change programs. Today, 60% of the private sector members of the Alliance still come from the fertilizer industry.
This group deserves no voice at COP21, the upcoming UN climate summit, GRAIN says, as "The elimination of chemical fertilizers is one of the easiest and most effective places to start" to bring about climate change action.
The industry's claims that we can't stop using their products are proven false by various studies showing that agroecological practices can produce the shame yields as industrial agriculture, the report sates.
"We now can say that the use of chemical fertilizers this year will generate more GHG emissions than the total GHG emissions from all of the cars and trucks driven in the US," added Devlin Kuyek, a researcher with GRAIN, in a statement. "The good news is that there is a quick fix for this problem: a worldwide switch to agroecological practices that can achieve the same yields without chemicals."
"Kicking the fertilizer habit is really a matter of politics," the report concludes. "No meaningful action can occur until the fertilizer industry's grip on policy makers is loosened. Let's start making this happen by shutting down the Global Alliance for Climate Smart Agriculture and booting the fertilizer companies out of the COP21 in Paris," it states.
GRAIN was among hundreds of signatories to a statement issued this month calling on governments and decision-makers "to reject the dangerous rhetoric of Climate-Smart Agriculture" and not to endorse such policies as a solution to climate change.
Fertilizer companies are the "Exxons of agriculture" and are blocking beneficial climate climate policies with their massive lobbying power, a new report charges.
The publication by GRAIN, an international nonprofit organization that advocates for locally-controlled, biodiversity-based food systems, describes how the fertilizer industry, whose products the group says are responsible for up to 10% of global greenhouse gas emissions, has joined forces with major corporations like Walmart in order to cast itself as a purveyor of "climate smart" policies while protecting its interests.
Yet these so-called "climate smart" polices that rely on the industry's products are anything but, GRAIN states. Take nitrogen fertilizers--they take a lot of energy to produce, and they are increasingly relying on fracked wells for that production. The damage continues once they're applied to fields, the report continues:
The International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) estimates that for every 100 kg of nitrogen fertilizer applied to the soil, one kg ends up in the atmosphere as nitrous oxide (N2O), a gas that is 300 times more potent than CO2 as a greenhouse gas and is the world's most significant ozone-depleting substance. In 2014, this was equivalent to the average annual emissions of 72 million cars driven in the US--about a third of the US fleet of cars and trucks.
"Fertilizer companies, like Yara of Norway, are the Exxons of agriculture," Henk Hobbelink, the Coordinator of GRAIN, said in a media statement. "They fuel a model of agriculture that is destroying the planet and they are doing everything in their power to block action on climate change that would injure their profits."
Case in point of the industry's power to block such action is the Global Alliance for Climate Smart Agriculture. Launched last year at the UN Summit on Climate Change in New York, GACSA's stated goal is "is to improve people's food security and nutrition in the face of climate change."
The report describes it as
the culmination of several years of efforts by the fertilizer lobby to block meaningful action on agriculture and climate change. Of the Alliance's 29 non-governmental founding members, there are three fertilizer industry lobby groups, two of the world's largest fertilizer companies (Yara of Norway and Mosaic of the US), and a handful of organizations working directly with fertilizer companies on climate change programs. Today, 60% of the private sector members of the Alliance still come from the fertilizer industry.
This group deserves no voice at COP21, the upcoming UN climate summit, GRAIN says, as "The elimination of chemical fertilizers is one of the easiest and most effective places to start" to bring about climate change action.
The industry's claims that we can't stop using their products are proven false by various studies showing that agroecological practices can produce the shame yields as industrial agriculture, the report sates.
"We now can say that the use of chemical fertilizers this year will generate more GHG emissions than the total GHG emissions from all of the cars and trucks driven in the US," added Devlin Kuyek, a researcher with GRAIN, in a statement. "The good news is that there is a quick fix for this problem: a worldwide switch to agroecological practices that can achieve the same yields without chemicals."
"Kicking the fertilizer habit is really a matter of politics," the report concludes. "No meaningful action can occur until the fertilizer industry's grip on policy makers is loosened. Let's start making this happen by shutting down the Global Alliance for Climate Smart Agriculture and booting the fertilizer companies out of the COP21 in Paris," it states.
GRAIN was among hundreds of signatories to a statement issued this month calling on governments and decision-makers "to reject the dangerous rhetoric of Climate-Smart Agriculture" and not to endorse such policies as a solution to climate change.