If Top General Gets His Way, America's 'Longest War' Will Become Even Longer
General John Campbell says he wants to keep U.S. troops in Afghanistan for as long as possible—and is considering asking for even more
If the highest-ranking U.S. and NATO military commander in Afghanistan gets his way, America's longest official war could become even more protracted.
Army General John Campbell said in a USA Today article published on Tuesday that he wants to keep the 9,800 American troops currently in Afghanistan there for as long as possible--and is considering asking for even more boots on the ground.
"My intent would be to keep as much as I could for as long as I could," Campbell told the paper from Kabul.
"Every time I've gone to the president and said, 'I need X,' I've been very, very fortunate that he's provided that."
--Army General John Campbell
The general's comments follow President Obama's October announcement that he plans to reverse his pledge to remove all but 1,000 U.S. troops from the country by the conclusion of 2016. Instead, Obama proclaimed that the 9,800 troops would be maintained through most of 2016 and cut to 5,500 by the beginning of 2017.
Even then, Obama's statement came despite the official declaration a year ago that the war was "over."
But now Campbell plans to ask the president to put off troop withdrawals even further by delaying the reduction to 5,500 troops.
"If I don't believe that we can accomplish the train, advise and assist... the (counter-terrorism) missions, then I owe it to the senior leadership to come back and say, 'Here's what I need,'" Campbell said. "If that's more people, it's more people."
The general expressed confidence that he would get his way. "My job as commander on the ground is to make assessments continually," Campbell said. "Every time I've gone to the president and said, 'I need X,' I've been very fortunate that he's provided that. So he's been very flexible."
Campbell's comments come as the U.S.-led war in Afghanistan stretches well into its 15th year--and appears certain to extend into the next presidency. While many argue that the Afghanistan intervention is not, in reality, the longest war in U.S. history, it is widely recognized as the most protracted, according to the official record.
What's more, the Bilateral Security Agreement signed in 2014 by the U.S. and Afghanistan locks in another decade of heavy American involvement in the country, including the training, funding, and arming of the Afghan military. The pact also secures immunity for U.S. service members under Afghan law--a highly controversial measure in a country that has suffered civilian massacres by U.S. troops.
The U.S. is planning a military role long into Afghanistan's future despite indications that its long-term intervention and occupation so far has worsened conflict and violence, with the Taliban now showing signs of increased strength.
Meanwhile, Afghan civilians continue to pay the greatest price. In the first half of 2015 alone, United Nations agencies documented 4,921 civilian casualties (1,592 deaths and 3,329 injured).
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
If the highest-ranking U.S. and NATO military commander in Afghanistan gets his way, America's longest official war could become even more protracted.
Army General John Campbell said in a USA Today article published on Tuesday that he wants to keep the 9,800 American troops currently in Afghanistan there for as long as possible--and is considering asking for even more boots on the ground.
"My intent would be to keep as much as I could for as long as I could," Campbell told the paper from Kabul.
"Every time I've gone to the president and said, 'I need X,' I've been very, very fortunate that he's provided that."
--Army General John Campbell
The general's comments follow President Obama's October announcement that he plans to reverse his pledge to remove all but 1,000 U.S. troops from the country by the conclusion of 2016. Instead, Obama proclaimed that the 9,800 troops would be maintained through most of 2016 and cut to 5,500 by the beginning of 2017.
Even then, Obama's statement came despite the official declaration a year ago that the war was "over."
But now Campbell plans to ask the president to put off troop withdrawals even further by delaying the reduction to 5,500 troops.
"If I don't believe that we can accomplish the train, advise and assist... the (counter-terrorism) missions, then I owe it to the senior leadership to come back and say, 'Here's what I need,'" Campbell said. "If that's more people, it's more people."
The general expressed confidence that he would get his way. "My job as commander on the ground is to make assessments continually," Campbell said. "Every time I've gone to the president and said, 'I need X,' I've been very fortunate that he's provided that. So he's been very flexible."
Campbell's comments come as the U.S.-led war in Afghanistan stretches well into its 15th year--and appears certain to extend into the next presidency. While many argue that the Afghanistan intervention is not, in reality, the longest war in U.S. history, it is widely recognized as the most protracted, according to the official record.
What's more, the Bilateral Security Agreement signed in 2014 by the U.S. and Afghanistan locks in another decade of heavy American involvement in the country, including the training, funding, and arming of the Afghan military. The pact also secures immunity for U.S. service members under Afghan law--a highly controversial measure in a country that has suffered civilian massacres by U.S. troops.
The U.S. is planning a military role long into Afghanistan's future despite indications that its long-term intervention and occupation so far has worsened conflict and violence, with the Taliban now showing signs of increased strength.
Meanwhile, Afghan civilians continue to pay the greatest price. In the first half of 2015 alone, United Nations agencies documented 4,921 civilian casualties (1,592 deaths and 3,329 injured).
If the highest-ranking U.S. and NATO military commander in Afghanistan gets his way, America's longest official war could become even more protracted.
Army General John Campbell said in a USA Today article published on Tuesday that he wants to keep the 9,800 American troops currently in Afghanistan there for as long as possible--and is considering asking for even more boots on the ground.
"My intent would be to keep as much as I could for as long as I could," Campbell told the paper from Kabul.
"Every time I've gone to the president and said, 'I need X,' I've been very, very fortunate that he's provided that."
--Army General John Campbell
The general's comments follow President Obama's October announcement that he plans to reverse his pledge to remove all but 1,000 U.S. troops from the country by the conclusion of 2016. Instead, Obama proclaimed that the 9,800 troops would be maintained through most of 2016 and cut to 5,500 by the beginning of 2017.
Even then, Obama's statement came despite the official declaration a year ago that the war was "over."
But now Campbell plans to ask the president to put off troop withdrawals even further by delaying the reduction to 5,500 troops.
"If I don't believe that we can accomplish the train, advise and assist... the (counter-terrorism) missions, then I owe it to the senior leadership to come back and say, 'Here's what I need,'" Campbell said. "If that's more people, it's more people."
The general expressed confidence that he would get his way. "My job as commander on the ground is to make assessments continually," Campbell said. "Every time I've gone to the president and said, 'I need X,' I've been very fortunate that he's provided that. So he's been very flexible."
Campbell's comments come as the U.S.-led war in Afghanistan stretches well into its 15th year--and appears certain to extend into the next presidency. While many argue that the Afghanistan intervention is not, in reality, the longest war in U.S. history, it is widely recognized as the most protracted, according to the official record.
What's more, the Bilateral Security Agreement signed in 2014 by the U.S. and Afghanistan locks in another decade of heavy American involvement in the country, including the training, funding, and arming of the Afghan military. The pact also secures immunity for U.S. service members under Afghan law--a highly controversial measure in a country that has suffered civilian massacres by U.S. troops.
The U.S. is planning a military role long into Afghanistan's future despite indications that its long-term intervention and occupation so far has worsened conflict and violence, with the Taliban now showing signs of increased strength.
Meanwhile, Afghan civilians continue to pay the greatest price. In the first half of 2015 alone, United Nations agencies documented 4,921 civilian casualties (1,592 deaths and 3,329 injured).