Clinton Camp says She's Been Forced to the Left Enough Already
Clinton ally tells The Hill, "I don't know what's left to extract."
Fresh after Bernie Sanders' call for "a fifty-state strategy... to plant the flag of progressive politics" nationwide, new reporting on Friday suggests that Hillary Clinton's campaign won't budge further to the left.
After Clinton claimed more victories in Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, and Pennsylvania this week, Sanders said, "We are in this race until the last vote is cast," adding that his campaign would head "to the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia with as many delegates as possible to fight for a progressive party platform."
Observers say that steps forward on issues that would constitute such a platform can already be seen in the race. As Max Ehrenfreund writes at Washington Post's Wonkblog Friday,
In the course of fending off Sanders's challenge, Clinton appears to have conceded to him on a couple of major economic policy issues. The former U.S. senator and secretary of state has abandoned the centrist positions she previously held on trade and Social Security and taken stances closer to Sanders's views.
Ehrenfreund writes that that's not all that surprising, given the factors that are different from Sanders. He points to data from the Pew Research Center showing Americans' attitudes on various issues, including race, poverty, regulation, and foreign policy, are becoming more progressive. He notes the influence of politicians like Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) in areas like Social Security.
However, Amie Parnes writes at The Hill, "Clinton supporters argue the former Secretary of State has already been forced to the left by Sanders, and can't risk moving further ahead of a general election."
While political talk show host Bill Press told The Hill that Clinton should not "move back to the center," Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-Mo.) told the political website that her campaign couldn't make any more leftward concessions, saying, "I don't know what's left to extract."
Cleaver added that "[Sanders has] already impacted this election probably more than anyone else, including Donald Trump," and then suggested it was time for Sanders to help gather support for his rival.
Parnes also cites an anonymous Clinton ally who said, "We can't do it," regarding meeting some of Sanders' policy demands.
As Sanders sees it, the Democratic Party as a whole is in crisis, saying Thursday that it "has not been clear about which side they are on on the major issues facing this country."
Speaking to thousands at a rally in Eugene, Ore., Sanders said, "The Democratic Party has to reach a fundamental conclusion: Are we on the side of working people or big money interests? Do we stand with the elderly, the children, and the sick and the poor, or do we stand with Wall Street speculators and the drug companies and the insurance companies?"
Sanders added, "Now our job is not just to revitalize the Democratic Party—not only to open the doors to young people and working people—our job is to revitalize American democracy."
Ehrenfreund concludes in his piece that despite securing the Democratic presidential nomination, Sanders' successful pushes on key issues mean "he might be on the winning side in the contest over the party's future."
Bloomberg's delegate tracker shows Clinton leading Sanders with 1,645 pledged delegates compared to his 1,318.
The next Democratic primary is in Indiana, with 92 delegates, on May 3.
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Fresh after Bernie Sanders' call for "a fifty-state strategy... to plant the flag of progressive politics" nationwide, new reporting on Friday suggests that Hillary Clinton's campaign won't budge further to the left.
After Clinton claimed more victories in Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, and Pennsylvania this week, Sanders said, "We are in this race until the last vote is cast," adding that his campaign would head "to the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia with as many delegates as possible to fight for a progressive party platform."
Observers say that steps forward on issues that would constitute such a platform can already be seen in the race. As Max Ehrenfreund writes at Washington Post's Wonkblog Friday,
In the course of fending off Sanders's challenge, Clinton appears to have conceded to him on a couple of major economic policy issues. The former U.S. senator and secretary of state has abandoned the centrist positions she previously held on trade and Social Security and taken stances closer to Sanders's views.
Ehrenfreund writes that that's not all that surprising, given the factors that are different from Sanders. He points to data from the Pew Research Center showing Americans' attitudes on various issues, including race, poverty, regulation, and foreign policy, are becoming more progressive. He notes the influence of politicians like Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) in areas like Social Security.
However, Amie Parnes writes at The Hill, "Clinton supporters argue the former Secretary of State has already been forced to the left by Sanders, and can't risk moving further ahead of a general election."
While political talk show host Bill Press told The Hill that Clinton should not "move back to the center," Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-Mo.) told the political website that her campaign couldn't make any more leftward concessions, saying, "I don't know what's left to extract."
Cleaver added that "[Sanders has] already impacted this election probably more than anyone else, including Donald Trump," and then suggested it was time for Sanders to help gather support for his rival.
Parnes also cites an anonymous Clinton ally who said, "We can't do it," regarding meeting some of Sanders' policy demands.
As Sanders sees it, the Democratic Party as a whole is in crisis, saying Thursday that it "has not been clear about which side they are on on the major issues facing this country."
Speaking to thousands at a rally in Eugene, Ore., Sanders said, "The Democratic Party has to reach a fundamental conclusion: Are we on the side of working people or big money interests? Do we stand with the elderly, the children, and the sick and the poor, or do we stand with Wall Street speculators and the drug companies and the insurance companies?"
Sanders added, "Now our job is not just to revitalize the Democratic Party—not only to open the doors to young people and working people—our job is to revitalize American democracy."
Ehrenfreund concludes in his piece that despite securing the Democratic presidential nomination, Sanders' successful pushes on key issues mean "he might be on the winning side in the contest over the party's future."
Bloomberg's delegate tracker shows Clinton leading Sanders with 1,645 pledged delegates compared to his 1,318.
The next Democratic primary is in Indiana, with 92 delegates, on May 3.
Fresh after Bernie Sanders' call for "a fifty-state strategy... to plant the flag of progressive politics" nationwide, new reporting on Friday suggests that Hillary Clinton's campaign won't budge further to the left.
After Clinton claimed more victories in Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, and Pennsylvania this week, Sanders said, "We are in this race until the last vote is cast," adding that his campaign would head "to the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia with as many delegates as possible to fight for a progressive party platform."
Observers say that steps forward on issues that would constitute such a platform can already be seen in the race. As Max Ehrenfreund writes at Washington Post's Wonkblog Friday,
In the course of fending off Sanders's challenge, Clinton appears to have conceded to him on a couple of major economic policy issues. The former U.S. senator and secretary of state has abandoned the centrist positions she previously held on trade and Social Security and taken stances closer to Sanders's views.
Ehrenfreund writes that that's not all that surprising, given the factors that are different from Sanders. He points to data from the Pew Research Center showing Americans' attitudes on various issues, including race, poverty, regulation, and foreign policy, are becoming more progressive. He notes the influence of politicians like Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) in areas like Social Security.
However, Amie Parnes writes at The Hill, "Clinton supporters argue the former Secretary of State has already been forced to the left by Sanders, and can't risk moving further ahead of a general election."
While political talk show host Bill Press told The Hill that Clinton should not "move back to the center," Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-Mo.) told the political website that her campaign couldn't make any more leftward concessions, saying, "I don't know what's left to extract."
Cleaver added that "[Sanders has] already impacted this election probably more than anyone else, including Donald Trump," and then suggested it was time for Sanders to help gather support for his rival.
Parnes also cites an anonymous Clinton ally who said, "We can't do it," regarding meeting some of Sanders' policy demands.
As Sanders sees it, the Democratic Party as a whole is in crisis, saying Thursday that it "has not been clear about which side they are on on the major issues facing this country."
Speaking to thousands at a rally in Eugene, Ore., Sanders said, "The Democratic Party has to reach a fundamental conclusion: Are we on the side of working people or big money interests? Do we stand with the elderly, the children, and the sick and the poor, or do we stand with Wall Street speculators and the drug companies and the insurance companies?"
Sanders added, "Now our job is not just to revitalize the Democratic Party—not only to open the doors to young people and working people—our job is to revitalize American democracy."
Ehrenfreund concludes in his piece that despite securing the Democratic presidential nomination, Sanders' successful pushes on key issues mean "he might be on the winning side in the contest over the party's future."
Bloomberg's delegate tracker shows Clinton leading Sanders with 1,645 pledged delegates compared to his 1,318.
The next Democratic primary is in Indiana, with 92 delegates, on May 3.