

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Testing the endurance of the proverbial 'camel's back' on Tuesday, many mainstream Republicans claimed to have reached their threshold of blatantly discriminatory remarks made by the anointed party nominee, Donald Trump.
Throughout his campaign, the New York billionaire has insulted entire sectors of people, from Mexicans and Muslims to women and people with disabilities. Despite this, the party has widely gotten behind his candidacy.
But the conservative world appears to be in free-fall after Trump defiantly stood by his assertion that the U.S. district court judge presiding over the Trump University case would not give a fair hearing because of his Mexican heritage.
As evidenced by the mid-Tuesday press conference by House Speaker Paul Ryan, many in the party appeared conflicted. While Ryan acknowledged that the remarks were indeed "the textbook definition of racist comments," he said that he will continue to support Trump for president.
"I believe that we have more common ground on the policy issues of the day," Ryan said, "and we have more likelihood of getting our policies enacted, with him than with [Hillary Clinton]."
In other words, as MSNBC host Chris Hayes put it: "He's a racist, sure, but we want to win!"
Meanwhile, New Jersey Governor and avowed Trump loyalist Chris Christie dismissed the outrage as a mere "kerfuffle."
Others within the Republican establishment were either less forgiving or more hopeful that this latest controversy would provide the long-awaited "off-ramp" from the Trump superhighway.
"You have to start calling him out and saying you're going to retract your endorsement of him today," declared MSNBC morning host Joe Scarborough, a one-time Trump ally and former Republican congressman from Florida, adding that GOP leaders can't allow Trump to "run roughshod over what remaining national reputation we have as a national party."
"Republicans," Scarborough urged, "call him out, back away from those endorsements, make him back down on the Muslim ban, make him back down on this racist comment that he's made about a man born in Indiana, saying he's incapable of being a fair judge because of where his parents were born."
Sen. Lindsey Graham, former 2016 presidential hopeful, similarly urged his colleagues to rescind their endorsements, telling the New York Times, "This is the most un-American thing from a politician since Joe McCarthy...If anybody was looking for an off-ramp, this is probably it."
"There'll come a time when the love of country will trump hatred of Hillary," he added, insinuating that many Republican defectors would likely turn to the Democratic frontrunner.
Making a constitutional case for her outrage, Sen. Susan Collins of Maine declared that Trump's statement "does not represent our American values."
"Mr. Trump's comments demonstrate both a lack of respect for the judicial system and the principle of separation of powers," Collins said Monday.
Son of the late and oft-lauded conservative President Ronald Reagan took to social media to declare that he would not be voting for Trump in the California primary, adding:
And Nebraskan Sen. Ben Grasse also took to Twitter to voice his disapproval, writing facetiously: "Public Service Announcement: Saying someone can't do a specific job because of his or her race is the literal definition of 'racism.'"
In a bizarre turn of events, Trump and his surrogates are now lobbing accusations of racism right back at critics.
In a conference call on Monday, the GOP nominee told supporters to "attack journalists who ask questions about the lawsuit and his comments about the judge," Bloomberg reported. "The people asking the questions--those are the racists," Trump said. "I would go at 'em."
Following suit, CNN political commentator and Trump supporter Jeffrey Lord on Tuesday lambasted Ryan for his muted criticism, saying: "Speaker Ryan has apparently switched positions and is now supporting identity politics. Which is racist."
As Huffington Post reported, Lord appeared to be employing "the old 'I'm rubber, you're glue' strategy."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |

Testing the endurance of the proverbial 'camel's back' on Tuesday, many mainstream Republicans claimed to have reached their threshold of blatantly discriminatory remarks made by the anointed party nominee, Donald Trump.
Throughout his campaign, the New York billionaire has insulted entire sectors of people, from Mexicans and Muslims to women and people with disabilities. Despite this, the party has widely gotten behind his candidacy.
But the conservative world appears to be in free-fall after Trump defiantly stood by his assertion that the U.S. district court judge presiding over the Trump University case would not give a fair hearing because of his Mexican heritage.
As evidenced by the mid-Tuesday press conference by House Speaker Paul Ryan, many in the party appeared conflicted. While Ryan acknowledged that the remarks were indeed "the textbook definition of racist comments," he said that he will continue to support Trump for president.
"I believe that we have more common ground on the policy issues of the day," Ryan said, "and we have more likelihood of getting our policies enacted, with him than with [Hillary Clinton]."
In other words, as MSNBC host Chris Hayes put it: "He's a racist, sure, but we want to win!"
Meanwhile, New Jersey Governor and avowed Trump loyalist Chris Christie dismissed the outrage as a mere "kerfuffle."
Others within the Republican establishment were either less forgiving or more hopeful that this latest controversy would provide the long-awaited "off-ramp" from the Trump superhighway.
"You have to start calling him out and saying you're going to retract your endorsement of him today," declared MSNBC morning host Joe Scarborough, a one-time Trump ally and former Republican congressman from Florida, adding that GOP leaders can't allow Trump to "run roughshod over what remaining national reputation we have as a national party."
"Republicans," Scarborough urged, "call him out, back away from those endorsements, make him back down on the Muslim ban, make him back down on this racist comment that he's made about a man born in Indiana, saying he's incapable of being a fair judge because of where his parents were born."
Sen. Lindsey Graham, former 2016 presidential hopeful, similarly urged his colleagues to rescind their endorsements, telling the New York Times, "This is the most un-American thing from a politician since Joe McCarthy...If anybody was looking for an off-ramp, this is probably it."
"There'll come a time when the love of country will trump hatred of Hillary," he added, insinuating that many Republican defectors would likely turn to the Democratic frontrunner.
Making a constitutional case for her outrage, Sen. Susan Collins of Maine declared that Trump's statement "does not represent our American values."
"Mr. Trump's comments demonstrate both a lack of respect for the judicial system and the principle of separation of powers," Collins said Monday.
Son of the late and oft-lauded conservative President Ronald Reagan took to social media to declare that he would not be voting for Trump in the California primary, adding:
And Nebraskan Sen. Ben Grasse also took to Twitter to voice his disapproval, writing facetiously: "Public Service Announcement: Saying someone can't do a specific job because of his or her race is the literal definition of 'racism.'"
In a bizarre turn of events, Trump and his surrogates are now lobbing accusations of racism right back at critics.
In a conference call on Monday, the GOP nominee told supporters to "attack journalists who ask questions about the lawsuit and his comments about the judge," Bloomberg reported. "The people asking the questions--those are the racists," Trump said. "I would go at 'em."
Following suit, CNN political commentator and Trump supporter Jeffrey Lord on Tuesday lambasted Ryan for his muted criticism, saying: "Speaker Ryan has apparently switched positions and is now supporting identity politics. Which is racist."
As Huffington Post reported, Lord appeared to be employing "the old 'I'm rubber, you're glue' strategy."

Testing the endurance of the proverbial 'camel's back' on Tuesday, many mainstream Republicans claimed to have reached their threshold of blatantly discriminatory remarks made by the anointed party nominee, Donald Trump.
Throughout his campaign, the New York billionaire has insulted entire sectors of people, from Mexicans and Muslims to women and people with disabilities. Despite this, the party has widely gotten behind his candidacy.
But the conservative world appears to be in free-fall after Trump defiantly stood by his assertion that the U.S. district court judge presiding over the Trump University case would not give a fair hearing because of his Mexican heritage.
As evidenced by the mid-Tuesday press conference by House Speaker Paul Ryan, many in the party appeared conflicted. While Ryan acknowledged that the remarks were indeed "the textbook definition of racist comments," he said that he will continue to support Trump for president.
"I believe that we have more common ground on the policy issues of the day," Ryan said, "and we have more likelihood of getting our policies enacted, with him than with [Hillary Clinton]."
In other words, as MSNBC host Chris Hayes put it: "He's a racist, sure, but we want to win!"
Meanwhile, New Jersey Governor and avowed Trump loyalist Chris Christie dismissed the outrage as a mere "kerfuffle."
Others within the Republican establishment were either less forgiving or more hopeful that this latest controversy would provide the long-awaited "off-ramp" from the Trump superhighway.
"You have to start calling him out and saying you're going to retract your endorsement of him today," declared MSNBC morning host Joe Scarborough, a one-time Trump ally and former Republican congressman from Florida, adding that GOP leaders can't allow Trump to "run roughshod over what remaining national reputation we have as a national party."
"Republicans," Scarborough urged, "call him out, back away from those endorsements, make him back down on the Muslim ban, make him back down on this racist comment that he's made about a man born in Indiana, saying he's incapable of being a fair judge because of where his parents were born."
Sen. Lindsey Graham, former 2016 presidential hopeful, similarly urged his colleagues to rescind their endorsements, telling the New York Times, "This is the most un-American thing from a politician since Joe McCarthy...If anybody was looking for an off-ramp, this is probably it."
"There'll come a time when the love of country will trump hatred of Hillary," he added, insinuating that many Republican defectors would likely turn to the Democratic frontrunner.
Making a constitutional case for her outrage, Sen. Susan Collins of Maine declared that Trump's statement "does not represent our American values."
"Mr. Trump's comments demonstrate both a lack of respect for the judicial system and the principle of separation of powers," Collins said Monday.
Son of the late and oft-lauded conservative President Ronald Reagan took to social media to declare that he would not be voting for Trump in the California primary, adding:
And Nebraskan Sen. Ben Grasse also took to Twitter to voice his disapproval, writing facetiously: "Public Service Announcement: Saying someone can't do a specific job because of his or her race is the literal definition of 'racism.'"
In a bizarre turn of events, Trump and his surrogates are now lobbing accusations of racism right back at critics.
In a conference call on Monday, the GOP nominee told supporters to "attack journalists who ask questions about the lawsuit and his comments about the judge," Bloomberg reported. "The people asking the questions--those are the racists," Trump said. "I would go at 'em."
Following suit, CNN political commentator and Trump supporter Jeffrey Lord on Tuesday lambasted Ryan for his muted criticism, saying: "Speaker Ryan has apparently switched positions and is now supporting identity politics. Which is racist."
As Huffington Post reported, Lord appeared to be employing "the old 'I'm rubber, you're glue' strategy."