

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Amid fights over trade deals, climate policy, and the minimum wage, the battle to save U.S. public education from the forces of corporatization and privatization has gotten minimal attention during the Democratic presidential primary.
Diane Ravitch wants to change that.
The education historian, professor, and blogger has requested a face-to-face meeting with presumptive Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton, to discuss--among other things--"the depth of antagonism towards charter schools among teachers."
Ravitch has the backing of more than 2,000 supporters, who have signed a petition requesting that Clinton respond to Ravitch's request "and meet with her so you may gain a better understanding of the educational issues in America."
As Yevonne Brannon, chairwoman of Public Schools First NC, told education activist Anthony Cody this week:
We must push for the right person to lead the Department of Education, someone who can forge a path to reconcile our split public schools system. We do need a way to bring the traditional and charter schools back into perspective and under local school boards to operate as they should with oversight by elected officials, accountable, transparency and they must be open to all children. We do need to dismantle high stake testing and vouchers to private schools. We need a way to ensure our teachers have the professional development they need and that they have a career path that pays them appropriately and rewards them fairly. Hillary - we need you to listen to Diane Ravitch and other national scholars who have the research to prove these points and to parents, students and teachers who have the knowledge to verify it on the ground.
Clinton's longstanding support for charter schools--for which she caught flak at Tuesday's National Education Association (NEA) annual meeting--is but one cause for concern among progressive educators.
The draft Democratic Party platform, for example, "contains a lot of reformer lingo," Ravitch wrote over the weekend.
She continued:
The rhetoric about "high academic standards" brings echoes of No Child Left Behind and Race to the Top. Wouldn't it have been refreshing to see a statement about meeting the needs of all children? Or ensuring that all schools have the staff and resources they need for the children they enroll?
And then there's the section on charters. The party is against for-profit charters: so far, so good, but how about saying that a Clinton administration will stop federal funding of for-profit schools and colleges, because they are low-quality and predatory, with profit as their top priority?
[...] How about a clear statement that the Clinton administration will no longer permit school closings as academic punishment? How about a clear signal that the Clinton administration intends to protect and strengthen our nation's essential traditional public schools, which serve all children. How about signaling a new direction for federal education policy, one that promises to support schools and educators, not to punish them.
Meanwhile, Ravitch and fellow public education advocates are gearing up for a "Save our Schools" march on Friday in the nation's capital, followed by two days of workshops. The coalition's demands include:
"If you are fed up with the privatization of public schools and the high-stakes testing that has harmed real education, please join us," Ravitch wrote in a call-to-action.
Clinton is scheduled to address the American Federation of Teachers (which, like the NEA, has endorsed her) later this month in Minneapolis.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Amid fights over trade deals, climate policy, and the minimum wage, the battle to save U.S. public education from the forces of corporatization and privatization has gotten minimal attention during the Democratic presidential primary.
Diane Ravitch wants to change that.
The education historian, professor, and blogger has requested a face-to-face meeting with presumptive Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton, to discuss--among other things--"the depth of antagonism towards charter schools among teachers."
Ravitch has the backing of more than 2,000 supporters, who have signed a petition requesting that Clinton respond to Ravitch's request "and meet with her so you may gain a better understanding of the educational issues in America."
As Yevonne Brannon, chairwoman of Public Schools First NC, told education activist Anthony Cody this week:
We must push for the right person to lead the Department of Education, someone who can forge a path to reconcile our split public schools system. We do need a way to bring the traditional and charter schools back into perspective and under local school boards to operate as they should with oversight by elected officials, accountable, transparency and they must be open to all children. We do need to dismantle high stake testing and vouchers to private schools. We need a way to ensure our teachers have the professional development they need and that they have a career path that pays them appropriately and rewards them fairly. Hillary - we need you to listen to Diane Ravitch and other national scholars who have the research to prove these points and to parents, students and teachers who have the knowledge to verify it on the ground.
Clinton's longstanding support for charter schools--for which she caught flak at Tuesday's National Education Association (NEA) annual meeting--is but one cause for concern among progressive educators.
The draft Democratic Party platform, for example, "contains a lot of reformer lingo," Ravitch wrote over the weekend.
She continued:
The rhetoric about "high academic standards" brings echoes of No Child Left Behind and Race to the Top. Wouldn't it have been refreshing to see a statement about meeting the needs of all children? Or ensuring that all schools have the staff and resources they need for the children they enroll?
And then there's the section on charters. The party is against for-profit charters: so far, so good, but how about saying that a Clinton administration will stop federal funding of for-profit schools and colleges, because they are low-quality and predatory, with profit as their top priority?
[...] How about a clear statement that the Clinton administration will no longer permit school closings as academic punishment? How about a clear signal that the Clinton administration intends to protect and strengthen our nation's essential traditional public schools, which serve all children. How about signaling a new direction for federal education policy, one that promises to support schools and educators, not to punish them.
Meanwhile, Ravitch and fellow public education advocates are gearing up for a "Save our Schools" march on Friday in the nation's capital, followed by two days of workshops. The coalition's demands include:
"If you are fed up with the privatization of public schools and the high-stakes testing that has harmed real education, please join us," Ravitch wrote in a call-to-action.
Clinton is scheduled to address the American Federation of Teachers (which, like the NEA, has endorsed her) later this month in Minneapolis.
Amid fights over trade deals, climate policy, and the minimum wage, the battle to save U.S. public education from the forces of corporatization and privatization has gotten minimal attention during the Democratic presidential primary.
Diane Ravitch wants to change that.
The education historian, professor, and blogger has requested a face-to-face meeting with presumptive Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton, to discuss--among other things--"the depth of antagonism towards charter schools among teachers."
Ravitch has the backing of more than 2,000 supporters, who have signed a petition requesting that Clinton respond to Ravitch's request "and meet with her so you may gain a better understanding of the educational issues in America."
As Yevonne Brannon, chairwoman of Public Schools First NC, told education activist Anthony Cody this week:
We must push for the right person to lead the Department of Education, someone who can forge a path to reconcile our split public schools system. We do need a way to bring the traditional and charter schools back into perspective and under local school boards to operate as they should with oversight by elected officials, accountable, transparency and they must be open to all children. We do need to dismantle high stake testing and vouchers to private schools. We need a way to ensure our teachers have the professional development they need and that they have a career path that pays them appropriately and rewards them fairly. Hillary - we need you to listen to Diane Ravitch and other national scholars who have the research to prove these points and to parents, students and teachers who have the knowledge to verify it on the ground.
Clinton's longstanding support for charter schools--for which she caught flak at Tuesday's National Education Association (NEA) annual meeting--is but one cause for concern among progressive educators.
The draft Democratic Party platform, for example, "contains a lot of reformer lingo," Ravitch wrote over the weekend.
She continued:
The rhetoric about "high academic standards" brings echoes of No Child Left Behind and Race to the Top. Wouldn't it have been refreshing to see a statement about meeting the needs of all children? Or ensuring that all schools have the staff and resources they need for the children they enroll?
And then there's the section on charters. The party is against for-profit charters: so far, so good, but how about saying that a Clinton administration will stop federal funding of for-profit schools and colleges, because they are low-quality and predatory, with profit as their top priority?
[...] How about a clear statement that the Clinton administration will no longer permit school closings as academic punishment? How about a clear signal that the Clinton administration intends to protect and strengthen our nation's essential traditional public schools, which serve all children. How about signaling a new direction for federal education policy, one that promises to support schools and educators, not to punish them.
Meanwhile, Ravitch and fellow public education advocates are gearing up for a "Save our Schools" march on Friday in the nation's capital, followed by two days of workshops. The coalition's demands include:
"If you are fed up with the privatization of public schools and the high-stakes testing that has harmed real education, please join us," Ravitch wrote in a call-to-action.
Clinton is scheduled to address the American Federation of Teachers (which, like the NEA, has endorsed her) later this month in Minneapolis.