

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Despite calls from environmental leaders, major insurance companies, global investors, and climate groups, the G20 has failed to put a deadline on phasing out fossil fuel subsidies, yet again.
German press agency DPA reported Monday that a late draft of the G20 Leaders' Communique "did not mention plans to fulfill a promise the G20 made seven years ago to put an end to controversial fossil fuel subsidies."
That recalcitrance runs counter to wide swaths of public opinion.
An open letter (pdf) in June from more than 200 civil society organizations called for a 2020 cut-off date, warning that the estimated $444 billion in G20 subsidies to the fossil fuels industry "are locking in long-lived, high-emitting infrastructure and unlocking new fossil fuel reserves." Bloomberg, in an editorial last week, called fossil fuel subsidies "an egregious policy failure that has been allowed to persist for far too long."
On the heels of the U.S. and China formally doing so on Saturday, the entire G20 did pledge to join the Paris climate agreement, with the communique saying leaders "expect a rapid implementation of the agreement in all its dimensions."
But that deal--already limited in its ability to curtail global warming--is just lip service without action on subsides, said Oil Change International senior campaigner Alex Doukas on Monday.
"On China's watch, G20 leaders have again failed to set a deadline to end fossil fuel subsidies, despite first agreeing to do so in 2009," Doukas said. "Time is running out. Every dollar wasted on fossil fuel subsidies pushes us closer to climate disaster and makes the transition to clean energy more difficult. As more governments take the important step of ratifying the Paris Agreement on climate change, they must stop giving handouts to big polluters, which undermine the spirit and the letter of the Paris deal."
Li Shuo, Greenpeace East Asia's senior climate policy adviser, echoed that charge, declaring: "Handing out money to the fossil fuel industry is simply not compatible with the Paris Agreement."
What's more, Doukas told Climate Home, the communique included new language promising to "promote methods of extraction, transportation and processing of natural gas that minimise environmental impacts"--which would appear to directly contradict the goal of ending subsidies.
Both Greenpeace and Oil Change International called on Germany to push for strong climate action as new G20 host.
"If German Chancellor Angela Merkel wants to maintain her reputation as a climate champion through next year's G20 presidency, she must lead the way in securing a strong commitment from world leaders to end all fossil fuel subsidies by 2020," Doukas said. "The whole world is telling G20 leaders it's time to stop funding fossils."
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. If you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Despite calls from environmental leaders, major insurance companies, global investors, and climate groups, the G20 has failed to put a deadline on phasing out fossil fuel subsidies, yet again.
German press agency DPA reported Monday that a late draft of the G20 Leaders' Communique "did not mention plans to fulfill a promise the G20 made seven years ago to put an end to controversial fossil fuel subsidies."
That recalcitrance runs counter to wide swaths of public opinion.
An open letter (pdf) in June from more than 200 civil society organizations called for a 2020 cut-off date, warning that the estimated $444 billion in G20 subsidies to the fossil fuels industry "are locking in long-lived, high-emitting infrastructure and unlocking new fossil fuel reserves." Bloomberg, in an editorial last week, called fossil fuel subsidies "an egregious policy failure that has been allowed to persist for far too long."
On the heels of the U.S. and China formally doing so on Saturday, the entire G20 did pledge to join the Paris climate agreement, with the communique saying leaders "expect a rapid implementation of the agreement in all its dimensions."
But that deal--already limited in its ability to curtail global warming--is just lip service without action on subsides, said Oil Change International senior campaigner Alex Doukas on Monday.
"On China's watch, G20 leaders have again failed to set a deadline to end fossil fuel subsidies, despite first agreeing to do so in 2009," Doukas said. "Time is running out. Every dollar wasted on fossil fuel subsidies pushes us closer to climate disaster and makes the transition to clean energy more difficult. As more governments take the important step of ratifying the Paris Agreement on climate change, they must stop giving handouts to big polluters, which undermine the spirit and the letter of the Paris deal."
Li Shuo, Greenpeace East Asia's senior climate policy adviser, echoed that charge, declaring: "Handing out money to the fossil fuel industry is simply not compatible with the Paris Agreement."
What's more, Doukas told Climate Home, the communique included new language promising to "promote methods of extraction, transportation and processing of natural gas that minimise environmental impacts"--which would appear to directly contradict the goal of ending subsidies.
Both Greenpeace and Oil Change International called on Germany to push for strong climate action as new G20 host.
"If German Chancellor Angela Merkel wants to maintain her reputation as a climate champion through next year's G20 presidency, she must lead the way in securing a strong commitment from world leaders to end all fossil fuel subsidies by 2020," Doukas said. "The whole world is telling G20 leaders it's time to stop funding fossils."
Despite calls from environmental leaders, major insurance companies, global investors, and climate groups, the G20 has failed to put a deadline on phasing out fossil fuel subsidies, yet again.
German press agency DPA reported Monday that a late draft of the G20 Leaders' Communique "did not mention plans to fulfill a promise the G20 made seven years ago to put an end to controversial fossil fuel subsidies."
That recalcitrance runs counter to wide swaths of public opinion.
An open letter (pdf) in June from more than 200 civil society organizations called for a 2020 cut-off date, warning that the estimated $444 billion in G20 subsidies to the fossil fuels industry "are locking in long-lived, high-emitting infrastructure and unlocking new fossil fuel reserves." Bloomberg, in an editorial last week, called fossil fuel subsidies "an egregious policy failure that has been allowed to persist for far too long."
On the heels of the U.S. and China formally doing so on Saturday, the entire G20 did pledge to join the Paris climate agreement, with the communique saying leaders "expect a rapid implementation of the agreement in all its dimensions."
But that deal--already limited in its ability to curtail global warming--is just lip service without action on subsides, said Oil Change International senior campaigner Alex Doukas on Monday.
"On China's watch, G20 leaders have again failed to set a deadline to end fossil fuel subsidies, despite first agreeing to do so in 2009," Doukas said. "Time is running out. Every dollar wasted on fossil fuel subsidies pushes us closer to climate disaster and makes the transition to clean energy more difficult. As more governments take the important step of ratifying the Paris Agreement on climate change, they must stop giving handouts to big polluters, which undermine the spirit and the letter of the Paris deal."
Li Shuo, Greenpeace East Asia's senior climate policy adviser, echoed that charge, declaring: "Handing out money to the fossil fuel industry is simply not compatible with the Paris Agreement."
What's more, Doukas told Climate Home, the communique included new language promising to "promote methods of extraction, transportation and processing of natural gas that minimise environmental impacts"--which would appear to directly contradict the goal of ending subsidies.
Both Greenpeace and Oil Change International called on Germany to push for strong climate action as new G20 host.
"If German Chancellor Angela Merkel wants to maintain her reputation as a climate champion through next year's G20 presidency, she must lead the way in securing a strong commitment from world leaders to end all fossil fuel subsidies by 2020," Doukas said. "The whole world is telling G20 leaders it's time to stop funding fossils."