SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
'Business-As-Usual' Climate Scenario Will Cost World Economy $12 Trillion: UN
UN report warns of the costs of unabated climate change after election of U.S. president who plans to allow just that
Nov 17, 2016
Unabated fossil fuel emissions will cost the global economy a staggering $12 trillion by 2050, according to a new report from the United Nations.
The report predicts a temperature rise of 2.5oC by 2050 if climate change continues on its current course, compared to the 1.5oC temperature rise that was the goal of the emissions reduction plans laid out in the Paris climate accord. The world's gross domestic product will fall by $33 trillion in the "business-as-usual" scenario, the report found, and by $21 trillion under the 1.5oC scenario--a difference of $12 trillion.
The report, Pursuing the 1.5oC Limit, was published by the United Nations Development Programme along with "a group of 43 developing countries which are highly vulnerable to climate change," the Independent wrote Wednesday.
Its predictions fly in the face of President-elect Donald Trump's assertions during the presidential campaign that combating climate change would cost billions. And the report's findings appear all the more dire given Trump's climate change denial and vow to pull the U.S. out of the Paris agreement.
In addition to the financial cost, the ecological difference between the 1.5oC and 2.5oC scenarios is significant, the report found.
The Independent summarized its findings:
[Limiting temperature rise to 1.5oC] would also "substantially" reduce the risk of the flooding of large parts of the world's lowest lying land, "with theGreenland ice sheet facing irreversible decline most likely around 1.6C of warming."
All the ice on Greenland would take some time to melt but would raise sea levels by seven meters once completely gone.
Keeping global warming to 1.5 per cent would mean at least 10 per cent of the coral reefs on the planet would survive; any higher and the "virtual disappearance" of this key marine ecosystem would begin.
When it comes to averting doomsday scenarios, the world is swiftly running out of time. A separate report released Wednesday from the International Energy Agency (IEA) found that the world must cut fossil fuel emissions to zero by 2040 to limit warming to 1.5oC. This follows other research that showed temperatures rising over 7degC by 2100, if emissions continue as normal.
"The unavoidable conclusion is that there is an urgent need for immediate radical reductions in energy sector CO2 (carbon dioxide) emissions if there is to be any chance of achieving the 1.5 degree Celsius goal," the IEA said, according to Reuters.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Unabated fossil fuel emissions will cost the global economy a staggering $12 trillion by 2050, according to a new report from the United Nations.
The report predicts a temperature rise of 2.5oC by 2050 if climate change continues on its current course, compared to the 1.5oC temperature rise that was the goal of the emissions reduction plans laid out in the Paris climate accord. The world's gross domestic product will fall by $33 trillion in the "business-as-usual" scenario, the report found, and by $21 trillion under the 1.5oC scenario--a difference of $12 trillion.
The report, Pursuing the 1.5oC Limit, was published by the United Nations Development Programme along with "a group of 43 developing countries which are highly vulnerable to climate change," the Independent wrote Wednesday.
Its predictions fly in the face of President-elect Donald Trump's assertions during the presidential campaign that combating climate change would cost billions. And the report's findings appear all the more dire given Trump's climate change denial and vow to pull the U.S. out of the Paris agreement.
In addition to the financial cost, the ecological difference between the 1.5oC and 2.5oC scenarios is significant, the report found.
The Independent summarized its findings:
[Limiting temperature rise to 1.5oC] would also "substantially" reduce the risk of the flooding of large parts of the world's lowest lying land, "with theGreenland ice sheet facing irreversible decline most likely around 1.6C of warming."
All the ice on Greenland would take some time to melt but would raise sea levels by seven meters once completely gone.
Keeping global warming to 1.5 per cent would mean at least 10 per cent of the coral reefs on the planet would survive; any higher and the "virtual disappearance" of this key marine ecosystem would begin.
When it comes to averting doomsday scenarios, the world is swiftly running out of time. A separate report released Wednesday from the International Energy Agency (IEA) found that the world must cut fossil fuel emissions to zero by 2040 to limit warming to 1.5oC. This follows other research that showed temperatures rising over 7degC by 2100, if emissions continue as normal.
"The unavoidable conclusion is that there is an urgent need for immediate radical reductions in energy sector CO2 (carbon dioxide) emissions if there is to be any chance of achieving the 1.5 degree Celsius goal," the IEA said, according to Reuters.
Unabated fossil fuel emissions will cost the global economy a staggering $12 trillion by 2050, according to a new report from the United Nations.
The report predicts a temperature rise of 2.5oC by 2050 if climate change continues on its current course, compared to the 1.5oC temperature rise that was the goal of the emissions reduction plans laid out in the Paris climate accord. The world's gross domestic product will fall by $33 trillion in the "business-as-usual" scenario, the report found, and by $21 trillion under the 1.5oC scenario--a difference of $12 trillion.
The report, Pursuing the 1.5oC Limit, was published by the United Nations Development Programme along with "a group of 43 developing countries which are highly vulnerable to climate change," the Independent wrote Wednesday.
Its predictions fly in the face of President-elect Donald Trump's assertions during the presidential campaign that combating climate change would cost billions. And the report's findings appear all the more dire given Trump's climate change denial and vow to pull the U.S. out of the Paris agreement.
In addition to the financial cost, the ecological difference between the 1.5oC and 2.5oC scenarios is significant, the report found.
The Independent summarized its findings:
[Limiting temperature rise to 1.5oC] would also "substantially" reduce the risk of the flooding of large parts of the world's lowest lying land, "with theGreenland ice sheet facing irreversible decline most likely around 1.6C of warming."
All the ice on Greenland would take some time to melt but would raise sea levels by seven meters once completely gone.
Keeping global warming to 1.5 per cent would mean at least 10 per cent of the coral reefs on the planet would survive; any higher and the "virtual disappearance" of this key marine ecosystem would begin.
When it comes to averting doomsday scenarios, the world is swiftly running out of time. A separate report released Wednesday from the International Energy Agency (IEA) found that the world must cut fossil fuel emissions to zero by 2040 to limit warming to 1.5oC. This follows other research that showed temperatures rising over 7degC by 2100, if emissions continue as normal.
"The unavoidable conclusion is that there is an urgent need for immediate radical reductions in energy sector CO2 (carbon dioxide) emissions if there is to be any chance of achieving the 1.5 degree Celsius goal," the IEA said, according to Reuters.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.