Monsanto Wants to Keep You in The DARK
In the absence of a federal requirement to label GMOs, food activists have taken matters into their own hands, passing labeling laws in Vermont, Maine and Connecticut and putting the issue on the ballot in California, Washington, Colorado and Oregon. Big Food and its friends in the biotechnology industry haven't liked this one bit, and have spent over $80 million over the past several years to defeat GMO labeling ballot initiatives.
If you've been following the debate recently, you also know that companies like Monsanto have launched an aggressive PR campaign to sell the public on this questionable technology. Even beloved scientist Bill Nye has joined the fray, flipping his previously critical position on GMOs after a recent visit to Monsanto's headquarters.
As we've said before, the debate over GMOs isn't just about their possible environmental and public health effects. It's also about who controls the food system.
Today, Big Food's play for control became ever more clear when Representative Mike Pompeo (R-KS) introduced the Safe and Accurate Food Labeling Act, which might as well be called the "Denying Americans the Right to Know" Act (DARK Act), or Monsanto's Dream Bill. This is not Pompeo's first ride in the GMO rodeo. He first introduced this bill in the last Congress. Apparently the wave of state-level progress towards labeling GMOs rankled the giant companies that sell GMOs or make processed food out of them, so their trade association, the Grocery Manufacturers Association, decided to cut them off from the get-go by orchestrating federal legislation to block the states from getting in the labeling game.
In addition to preempting state-level GMO labeling efforts, the bill would also make it harder for FDA to set up a federal labeling requirement and would basically uphold our current, flawed system for GMO approvals. And what about those voluntary non-GMO labels you see on some foods now? Under the DARK Act, USDA would oversee those labels, and they'd most likely be weakened. Of course, this is all window dressing for the bill's primary intent--to prevent activists from passing GMO labeling bills on the state level.
We should be able to make informed choices about what we eat and feed our families. After all, we have nutrition labels that list ingredients, calories, vitamins and other important food facts. Why should GMOs be any different? Over 90 percent of Americans support the labeling of GMOs. This is an impressive consensus, one that we don't see on many issues in the U.S. Let's not let Monsanto, Dow, Coca-Cola and Kraft take away our right to know with bills like this that keep us in the dark.
It's time to shine a light on GMOs and ensure that they're properly labeled. Tell your member of Congress to protect our right to know by opposing the Dark Act.
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
In the absence of a federal requirement to label GMOs, food activists have taken matters into their own hands, passing labeling laws in Vermont, Maine and Connecticut and putting the issue on the ballot in California, Washington, Colorado and Oregon. Big Food and its friends in the biotechnology industry haven't liked this one bit, and have spent over $80 million over the past several years to defeat GMO labeling ballot initiatives.
If you've been following the debate recently, you also know that companies like Monsanto have launched an aggressive PR campaign to sell the public on this questionable technology. Even beloved scientist Bill Nye has joined the fray, flipping his previously critical position on GMOs after a recent visit to Monsanto's headquarters.
As we've said before, the debate over GMOs isn't just about their possible environmental and public health effects. It's also about who controls the food system.
Today, Big Food's play for control became ever more clear when Representative Mike Pompeo (R-KS) introduced the Safe and Accurate Food Labeling Act, which might as well be called the "Denying Americans the Right to Know" Act (DARK Act), or Monsanto's Dream Bill. This is not Pompeo's first ride in the GMO rodeo. He first introduced this bill in the last Congress. Apparently the wave of state-level progress towards labeling GMOs rankled the giant companies that sell GMOs or make processed food out of them, so their trade association, the Grocery Manufacturers Association, decided to cut them off from the get-go by orchestrating federal legislation to block the states from getting in the labeling game.
In addition to preempting state-level GMO labeling efforts, the bill would also make it harder for FDA to set up a federal labeling requirement and would basically uphold our current, flawed system for GMO approvals. And what about those voluntary non-GMO labels you see on some foods now? Under the DARK Act, USDA would oversee those labels, and they'd most likely be weakened. Of course, this is all window dressing for the bill's primary intent--to prevent activists from passing GMO labeling bills on the state level.
We should be able to make informed choices about what we eat and feed our families. After all, we have nutrition labels that list ingredients, calories, vitamins and other important food facts. Why should GMOs be any different? Over 90 percent of Americans support the labeling of GMOs. This is an impressive consensus, one that we don't see on many issues in the U.S. Let's not let Monsanto, Dow, Coca-Cola and Kraft take away our right to know with bills like this that keep us in the dark.
It's time to shine a light on GMOs and ensure that they're properly labeled. Tell your member of Congress to protect our right to know by opposing the Dark Act.
In the absence of a federal requirement to label GMOs, food activists have taken matters into their own hands, passing labeling laws in Vermont, Maine and Connecticut and putting the issue on the ballot in California, Washington, Colorado and Oregon. Big Food and its friends in the biotechnology industry haven't liked this one bit, and have spent over $80 million over the past several years to defeat GMO labeling ballot initiatives.
If you've been following the debate recently, you also know that companies like Monsanto have launched an aggressive PR campaign to sell the public on this questionable technology. Even beloved scientist Bill Nye has joined the fray, flipping his previously critical position on GMOs after a recent visit to Monsanto's headquarters.
As we've said before, the debate over GMOs isn't just about their possible environmental and public health effects. It's also about who controls the food system.
Today, Big Food's play for control became ever more clear when Representative Mike Pompeo (R-KS) introduced the Safe and Accurate Food Labeling Act, which might as well be called the "Denying Americans the Right to Know" Act (DARK Act), or Monsanto's Dream Bill. This is not Pompeo's first ride in the GMO rodeo. He first introduced this bill in the last Congress. Apparently the wave of state-level progress towards labeling GMOs rankled the giant companies that sell GMOs or make processed food out of them, so their trade association, the Grocery Manufacturers Association, decided to cut them off from the get-go by orchestrating federal legislation to block the states from getting in the labeling game.
In addition to preempting state-level GMO labeling efforts, the bill would also make it harder for FDA to set up a federal labeling requirement and would basically uphold our current, flawed system for GMO approvals. And what about those voluntary non-GMO labels you see on some foods now? Under the DARK Act, USDA would oversee those labels, and they'd most likely be weakened. Of course, this is all window dressing for the bill's primary intent--to prevent activists from passing GMO labeling bills on the state level.
We should be able to make informed choices about what we eat and feed our families. After all, we have nutrition labels that list ingredients, calories, vitamins and other important food facts. Why should GMOs be any different? Over 90 percent of Americans support the labeling of GMOs. This is an impressive consensus, one that we don't see on many issues in the U.S. Let's not let Monsanto, Dow, Coca-Cola and Kraft take away our right to know with bills like this that keep us in the dark.
It's time to shine a light on GMOs and ensure that they're properly labeled. Tell your member of Congress to protect our right to know by opposing the Dark Act.